Literature DB >> 19539086

Effect of biventricular pacing during a ventricular sensed event.

Mehmet Kemal Aktas1, Vinodh Jeevanantham, Saadia Sherazi, Dennis Flynn, Burr Hall, David T Huang, Spencer Rosero, James P Daubert, Abrar H Shah.   

Abstract

Loss of biventricular (BiV) pacing occurs during ventricular sensed events such as frequent ventricular ectopy, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and intrinsic atrioventricular nodal conduction, such as in atrial fibrillation. Ventricular sense response (VSR) pacing, a novel cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing strategy, maintains BiV pacing during these sensed ventricular events. Patients who underwent echocardiographic optimization after BiV pacemaker implantation were enrolled, and aortic velocity-time integrals (VTIs) were recorded and compared during intrinsic conduction without pacing, optimized BiV pacing, and intrinsic conduction with VSR pacing alone. Thirty-two patients were enrolled (mean age 68 +/- 11 years, 78% men), with a mean baseline QRS duration of 164 +/- 24 ms and a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of 23 +/- 10%. The mean aortic VTI during intrinsic conduction with VSR pacing was 16.5 +/- 3.6 cm, compared with 15.3 +/- 3.4 cm during intrinsic conduction without pacing (p <0.001). The mean aortic VTI with optimized BiV pacing was 17.3 +/- 3.6 cm, significantly better (p <0.001) compared with intrinsic conduction without pacing. Improvements in aortic VTI were higher with optimized BiV pacing compared with VSR pacing alone (p = 0.02). In the subgroup of patients with left bundle branch block-type activation, the hemodynamic improvements realized with VSR pacing were similar to optimized BiV pacing. Mean aortic VTI improvements with VSR were similar in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. In conclusion, a cardiac resynchronization therapy algorithm that maintains BiV pacing during a ventricular sensed event appears to have an aortic VTI response that is significantly better compared with intrinsic conduction without pacing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19539086     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  5 in total

1.  Left ventricular performance during triggered left ventricular pacing in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and left bundle branch block.

Authors:  Christoffer Tobias Witt; Mads Brix Kronborg; Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  The Burden and Morphology of Premature Ventricular Contractions and their Impact on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Biventricular Pacing in the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (MADIT-CRT).

Authors:  Mehmet K Aktas; Suneet Mittal; Valentina Kutyifa; Scott McNitt; Bronislava Polonsky; Jonathan Steinberg; Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 3.  [Management of premature ventricular ectopy in cardiac resynchronization therapy : Treatment strategies for an optimized cardiac resynchronization].

Authors:  Benjamin Rath; Julia Köbe; Florian Reinke; Lars Eckardt
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2021-01-29

4.  Resynchronization Therapy During Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia.

Authors:  Sergio F Cossú
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2017-01-15

5.  Atrial fibrillation in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mark K Elliott; Vishal S Mehta; Dejana Martic; Baldeep S Sidhu; Steven Niederer; Christopher A Rinaldi
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-12-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.