Literature DB >> 19538976

Executive functioning and imitation: Increasing working memory load facilitates behavioural imitation.

Matthijs L van Leeuwen1, Rick B van Baaren, Douglas Martin, Ap Dijksterhuis, Harold Bekkering.   

Abstract

If perceptual and bodily states are closely linked and if perceiving action automatically leads to corresponding activations in one's own motor system, then why do not we imitate all the time? There is evidence suggesting that executive functioning (EF) may play a moderating role in inhibiting overt imitation [e.g. Luria, A. R. (1966). Higher cortical functions in man. New York: Basic Books]. In an experiment we tested this idea. 48 participants received either a high or low working memory (WM) load and were instructed to respond to either a finger cue or spatial cue with a finger movement. Results indicate that occupying WM facilitates reaction times to finger cues while responses to simple spatial cues are unchanged. The findings suggest that imitation is indeed a dominant response and EF is needed to inhibit the spontaneous tendency to imitate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19538976     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  13 in total

1.  Alcohol and Emotional Contagion: An Examination of the Spreading of Smiles in Male and Female Drinking Groups.

Authors:  Catharine E Fairbairn; Michael A Sayette; Odd O Aalen; Arnoldo Frigessi
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-09-26

2.  Activity of human motor system during action observation is modulated by object presence.

Authors:  Michael Villiger; Sanjay Chandrasekharan; Timothy N Welsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of intentional movement preparation on response times to symbolic and imitative cues.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Amentha Rajagobal; Carl Michael Galang; Luisa Sartori; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures.

Authors:  Harry Farmer; Raqeeb Mahmood; Samantha E A Gregory; Polina Tishina; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2020-12-10

5.  The clinical and anatomical heterogeneity of environmental dependency phenomena.

Authors:  Julien Lagarde; Romain Valabrègue; Jean-Christophe Corvol; Isabelle Le Ber; Olivier Colliot; Marie Vidailhet; Richard Levy
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Where is the love? The social aspects of mimicry.

Authors:  Rick van Baaren; Loes Janssen; Tanya L Chartrand; Ap Dijksterhuis
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Attentional demands of movement observation as tested by a dual task approach.

Authors:  Cinthia M Saucedo Marquez; Tanja Ceux; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Face of the Chameleon: The Experience of Facial Mimicry for the Mimicker and the Mimickee.

Authors:  Wojciech Marek Kulesza; Aleksandra Cisłak; Robin R Vallacher; Andrzej Nowak; Martyna Czekiel; Sylwia Bedynska
Journal:  J Soc Psychol       Date:  2015-03-26

9.  Mimicry and automatic imitation are not correlated.

Authors:  Oliver Genschow; Sofie van Den Bossche; Emiel Cracco; Lara Bardi; Davide Rigoni; Marcel Brass
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Functionality of Spontaneous Mimicry and Its Influences on Affiliation: An Implicit Socialization Account.

Authors:  Liam C Kavanagh; Piotr Winkielman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.