Charles L Bowden1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA. bowdenc@uthscsa.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical effectiveness of drugs with anticonvulsant properties for interventions in persons with bipolar disorder and to place these findings in the context of clinicians' practices and their implications for future research to more effectively manage bipolar disorders. METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched up to February 2009 for clinical trial data, both original studies and reviews, on drugs with anticonvulsant properties studied for bipolar disorders. RESULTS: Valproate, principally as divalproex, has strong evidence for effectiveness in mania, moderately strong evidence for benefits in prophylaxis of recovered states, and recent proof-of-concept evidence for benefits in bipolar depression. Lamotrigine has strong evidence for evidence for effectiveness in maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder, principally for benefits in depressive states. Lamotrigine has been established as ineffective in mania and has lacked efficacy in acute bipolar depression in most randomized trials. Carbamazepine has strong evidence for effectiveness in mania, but lacks adequate studies in other aspects of bipolar disorder treatment. Its adverse effect profile and pharmacokinetic interference with a wide range of drugs, including many employed in bipolar disorder, warrants limitation of use to patients who have responded inadequately to other regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Three drugs, valproate, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine, have strong evidence-based support for use in clinical states of bipolar disorder. Other anticonvulsant drugs investigated in bipolar disorder either have evidence of lack of benefits in bipolar disorder or have been inadequately studied to determine possible effectiveness.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical effectiveness of drugs with anticonvulsant properties for interventions in persons with bipolar disorder and to place these findings in the context of clinicians' practices and their implications for future research to more effectively manage bipolar disorders. METHODS: Major electronic databases were searched up to February 2009 for clinical trial data, both original studies and reviews, on drugs with anticonvulsant properties studied for bipolar disorders. RESULTS:Valproate, principally as divalproex, has strong evidence for effectiveness in mania, moderately strong evidence for benefits in prophylaxis of recovered states, and recent proof-of-concept evidence for benefits in bipolar depression. Lamotrigine has strong evidence for evidence for effectiveness in maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder, principally for benefits in depressive states. Lamotrigine has been established as ineffective in mania and has lacked efficacy in acute bipolar depression in most randomized trials. Carbamazepine has strong evidence for effectiveness in mania, but lacks adequate studies in other aspects of bipolar disorder treatment. Its adverse effect profile and pharmacokinetic interference with a wide range of drugs, including many employed in bipolar disorder, warrants limitation of use to patients who have responded inadequately to other regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Three drugs, valproate, lamotrigine, and carbamazepine, have strong evidence-based support for use in clinical states of bipolar disorder. Other anticonvulsant drugs investigated in bipolar disorder either have evidence of lack of benefits in bipolar disorder or have been inadequately studied to determine possible effectiveness.
Authors: Epolia Ramadan; Mireille Basselin; Ameer Y Taha; Yewon Cheon; Lisa Chang; Mei Chen; Stanley I Rapoport Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Jakob A Shimshoni; Mireille Basselin; Lei O Li; Rosalind A Coleman; Stanley I Rapoport; Hiren R Modi Journal: Biochim Biophys Acta Date: 2010-12-22
Authors: Rose Mary Carvalho Pinheiro; Maria Noêmia Martins de Lima; Gabriel Rodrigo Fries; Vanessa Athaíde Garcia; Juliana Presti-Torres; Luis Henrique Hallmenschlager; Luisa Azambuja Alcalde; Rafael Roesler; Monica Levy Andersen; João Quevedo; Flávio Kapczinski; Nadja Schröder Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2012-01-05 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Joseph W Ditre; Jason A Oliver; Hugh Myrick; Scott Henderson; Michael E Saladin; David J Drobes Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Christian Riebeling; Ralph Pirow; Klaus Becker; Roland Buesen; Daniel Eikel; Johanna Kaltenhäuser; Frauke Meyer; Heinz Nau; Birgitta Slawik; Anke Visan; Jutta Volland; Horst Spielmann; Andreas Luch; Andrea Seiler Journal: Toxicol Sci Date: 2011-01-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Rodolfo N Campos; Luis F Costa; Danielle S Bio; Márcio G Soeiro de Souza; Carla R L Garcia; Frederico N Demétrio; Doris H Moreno; Ricardo A Moreno Journal: Trials Date: 2010-06-23 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Andrew A Nierenberg; Louisa G Sylvia; Andrew C Leon; Noreen A Reilly-Harrington; Leah W Shesler; Susan L McElroy; Edward S Friedman; Michael E Thase; Richard C Shelton; Charles L Bowden; Mauricio Tohen; Vivek Singh; Thilo Deckersbach; Terence A Ketter; James H Kocsis; Melvin G McInnis; David Schoenfeld; William V Bobo; Joseph R Calabrese Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 2.486