Literature DB >> 19538577

Travelers' preferences for the treatment and prevention of acute diarrhea.

Charles D Ericsson1, Nicolas A Melgarejo, Tomas Jelinek, Anne McCarthy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A survey was designed to assess travelers' willingness to take antibiotic chemoprophylaxis against travelers' diarrhea (TD) or to intervene with antibiotic or symptomatic treatments.
METHODS: A brief written questionnaire was administered to clients in North American (United States and Canadian) and European (UK and German) travel clinic waiting rooms to assess length, purpose, and destination of their upcoming trips; their perceived risk of developing TD at their destination; and their preferences for hypothetical treatment or chemoprophylaxis options, which included descriptions, but no mention of brand names, of a systemically absorbed antibiotic based on a fluoroquinolone, a nonabsorbed antibiotic based on rifaximin, and an over-the-counter antidiarrheal similar to loperamide.
RESULTS: The 209 UK and German travelers planned significantly longer travel than the 277 US and Canadian travelers (25 vs 15 d, p < 0.001) and correctly recognized high risk of TD more often than the North Americans (81% vs 61%, p < 0.001). More of the North Americans preferred any therapy options compared with the Europeans; only 14% of the North Americans preferred no treatment compared with 29% of the Europeans (p < 0.001). More of the North Americans and the Europeans preferred the nonabsorbed antibiotic than the systemically absorbed antibiotic, regardless of if combined with the antidiarrheal agent. Significantly more of the Europeans preferred not to take antibiotic chemoprophylaxis than North Americans (66% vs 37%, p < 0.001). Among the North Americans, significantly more travelers preferred chemoprophylaxis with the nonabsorbed than the systemic antibiotic (45% vs 33%, p= 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Among the relatively small groups of travelers studied, the UK and German travelers were more cognizant of TD risk than US and Canadian travelers. The Europeans were less inclined to take chemoprophylaxis or treatment. Both groups preferred treatment or prophylaxis with the nonabsorbed antibiotic over the systemically absorbed antibiotic or the antidiarrheal agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19538577     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8305.2009.00317.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Travel Med        ISSN: 1195-1982            Impact factor:   8.490


  3 in total

1.  Strategies to Prevent Acute Diarrhea and Upper Respiratory Tract Infection among Disaster Relief Workers.

Authors:  I-Lin Hsu; Chia-Chang Chuang; Chih-Hsien Chi; Chih-Hao Lin; Ming-Chie Tsai
Journal:  J Acute Med       Date:  2017-09-01

2.  Inconvenience due to travelers' diarrhea: a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  Darius Soonawala; Jessica A Vlot; Leo G Visser
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-20       Impact factor: 3.090

3.  Summary of the Committee to Advise on Tropical Medicine and Travel (CATMAT) Statement on Travellers' Diarrhea.

Authors:  M Libman
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  2015-11-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.