Literature DB >> 19537872

Reliability of the adhesive remnant index score system with different magnifications.

Mona A Montasser1, James L Drummond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores show no differences when examined under different magnifications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 80 upper human premolars. Stainless steel brackets were bonded to the specimens with Transbond XT light cure adhesive and Transbond Plus Self Etch Primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif, USA). The brackets were debonded 24 hours after bonding with a universal testing machine (LLOYD Instruments, Segensworth, Fareham, England) at a cross head speed of 2.00 mm/min. The adhesive remnant was evaluated after debonding with the naked eye and under 10x and 20x magnification (Mag) using the 4-point scale described by Artun and Bergland.
RESULTS: ARI scores were significantly different at different magnifications (P = .018). Scores were not significantly different when evaluated with the naked eye and under 10x Mag (P = .102). Scores were significantly different under 20x Mag and with the naked eye (P = .014); under 20x Mag, score 0 decreased from 12 to 6 and score 2 increased from 14 to 20 and also under 20x Mag and under 10x Mag (P = .046); the under 20x Mag score 1 decreased from 40 to 38 and score 3 increased from 14 to 16.
CONCLUSION: ARI scores were significantly different under 20x Mag, where score 0 decreased and score 2 increased compared with the naked eye, while score 1 decreased and score 3 increased compared with 10x Mag.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19537872     DOI: 10.2319/080108-398.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of the Debonding Characteristics of Conventional and New Debonding Instrument used for Ceramic, Composite and Metallic Brackets - An Invitro Study.

Authors:  Garima Choudhary; Vikas Gill; Y N N Reddy; Sudhanshu Sanadhya; Pankaj Aapaliya; Nidhi Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-07-20

2.  Evaluating the Type of Light Transmittance in Mono Crystalline, Poly Crystalline and Sapphire Brackets- An Invitro Spectrofluorometer Study.

Authors:  Jauhar P Mohamed; Pradeep Babu Kommi; M Senthil Kumar; Arani Nanda Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-08-01

3.  Different modes of diode laser irradiation: effects on enamel surface and intrapulpal temperature at debonding.

Authors:  Soghra Yassaei; Hosseinagha Aghili; Zahra Ebrahimi-Nik
Journal:  Laser Ther       Date:  2018-09-30

4.  Effects of Ozone and Prophylactic Antimicrobial Applications on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets.

Authors:  Özer Alkan; Burcu Oktay Çöven; Betül Özçopur; Fatih Kazancı; Yeşim Kaya; Cihan Aydoğan; Gürcan Eskitaşçıoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-12-01

5.  Effect of enamel protective agents on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Mona A Montasser; Mahasen Taha
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.750

6.  Toothpaste prevents debonded brackets on erosive enamel.

Authors:  Érico Luiz Damasceno Barros; Shelon Cristina Souza Pinto; Alvaro Henrique Borges; Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto; Roger Phillip Ellwood; Ian Pretty; Matheus Coelho Bandéca
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2015-03-23

7.  Orthodontics: Bracket Materials, Adhesives Systems, and Their Bond Strength.

Authors:  Andrea Scribante; Rosalia Contreras-Bulnes; Mona A Montasser; Pekka K Vallittu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to enamel pretreated with Er,Cr:YSGG LASER and CPP-ACP.

Authors:  Yomna A Nabawy; Tarek N Yousry; Nadia M El-Harouni
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation with different scaler-tip angulations on the shear bond strength and bond failure mode of metallic orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Giulio Alessandri Bonetti; Serena Incerti Parenti; Daniela Rit Ippolito; Maria Rosari Gatto; Checchi Luigi
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Efficiency of different protocols for enamel clean-up after bracket debonding: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Lara Carvalho Freitas Sigilião; Mariana Marquezan; Carlos Nelson Elias; Antônio Carlos Ruellas; Eduardo Franzotti Sant'Anna
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.