Literature DB >> 19537543

Top-down effects on antagonistic inducible defense and offense.

Osamu Kishida1, Geoffrey C Trussell, Kinya Nishimura.   

Abstract

Antagonistic phenotypic plasticity may strongly influence trait evolution in tightly interacting predator-prey pairs as well as the role that trait plasticity plays in community dynamics. Most work on trait plasticity has focused on single predator-prey pairs, but prey must often contend with multiple predators in natural environments. Hence, a better understanding of the evolutionary and ecological significance of phenotypic plasticity requires experiments that examine how multiple predators shape prey trait plasticity. Here, using a simple food chain consisting of a top predator (dragonfly larvae, Aeshna nigroflava), an intermediate predator (salamander larvae, Hynobius retardatus), and frog (Rana pirica) tadpoles as prey, we show that the presence of dragonfly risk cues substantially modifies the intensity of antagonistic morphological plasticity in both amphibians. In the absence of dragonflies, tadpoles produced bulgier bodies in response to salamanders, and salamanders responded to this defense by enlarging their gape size. However, in the presence of dragonfly risk cues, the expression of both antagonistic traits was significantly reduced because tadpoles and salamanders produced phenotypes that are more effective against dragonfly predators. Thus, the reduced antagonism likely emerged, in part, because the benefits of antagonistic trait expression were outweighed by the potential cost of increased vulnerability to dragonfly predation. In addition, our results suggest that when all three species were present, salamander activity levels, which influence the amount of signals required to induce antagonistic traits, were more strongly affected by dragonfly risk cues than were tadpole activity levels. This species-specific difference in activity levels was likely responsible for the reduced tadpole mortality caused by salamanders in the presence vs. absence of dragonfly risk cues. Hence, dragonflies had a positive trait-mediated indirect effect on tadpoles by modifying both the morphological and behavioral traits of salamanders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19537543     DOI: 10.1890/08-0238.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  9 in total

1.  Nonadditive impacts of temperature and basal resource availability on predator-prey interactions and phenotypes.

Authors:  Zacharia J Costa; Osamu Kishida
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Resource competition explains rare cannibalism in the wild in livebearing fishes.

Authors:  Rüdiger Riesch; Márcio S Araújo; Stuart Bumgarner; Caitlynn Filla; Laura Pennafort; Taylor R Goins; Darlene Lucion; Amber M Makowicz; Ryan A Martin; Sara Pirroni; R Brian Langerhans
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Reciprocity in predator-prey interactions: exposure to defended prey and predation risk affects intermediate predator life history and morphology.

Authors:  Edd Hammill; Andrew P Beckerman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  An inducible offense: carnivore morph tadpoles induced by tadpole carnivory.

Authors:  Nicholas A Levis; Sofia de la Serna Buzón; David W Pfennig
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Gene expression profiles in Rana pirica tadpoles following exposure to a predation threat.

Authors:  Tsukasa Mori; Yukio Yanagisawa; Yoichiro Kitani; Manabu Sugiyama; Osamu Kishida; Kinya Nishimura
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Keystone nonconsumptive effects within a diverse predator community.

Authors:  Amanda J Meadows; Jeb P Owen; William E Snyder
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Multi-species suppression of herbivores through consumptive and non-consumptive effects.

Authors:  Kathryn S Ingerslew; Deborah L Finke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Integration of multiple intraguild predator cues for oviposition decisions by a predatory mite.

Authors:  Andreas Walzer; Peter Schausberger
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.844

9.  Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality.

Authors:  Quirin Herzog; Christian Laforsch
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 7.431

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.