| Literature DB >> 19536093 |
J-B Bachet1, I Hostein, A Le Cesne, S Brahimi, A Beauchet, S Tabone-Eglinger, F Subra, B Bui, F Duffaud, P Terrier, J-M Coindre, J-Y Blay, J-F Emile.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: KIT exon 11 mutations are observed in 60% of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Exon 11 codes for residues Tyr568 and Tyr570, which play a major role in signal transduction and degradation of KIT. Our aim was to compare the outcome of patients with deletion of both Tyr568-570 (delTyr) and the most frequent deletion delWK557-558 (delWK).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19536093 PMCID: PMC2713701 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1Type and position of deletions including both tyrosines Tyr568 and Tyr570.
Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients according to the type of exon 11 deletion
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 42 | 26 |
| Age at diagnosis (years) | 58 (19–93) | 63 (44–86) |
|
| ||
| Male | 22 (52%) | 16 (62.5%) |
| Female | 20 (48%) | 10 (37.5%) |
|
| ||
| Resectable | 32 (76%) | 16 (61%) |
| Non-resectable | 2 (5%) | 1 (4%) |
| Metastatic | 8 (19%) | 9 (35%) |
|
| ||
| Stomach | 31 (74%) | 8 (31%) |
| Small Intestine | 8 (19%) | 15 (58%) |
| Colon/rectum | 3 (7%) | 3 (11%) |
|
| ||
| Spindle type | 31 (74%) | 21 (80%) |
| Epithelioid type | 3 (7%) | 1 (4%) |
| Mixed type | 8 (19%) | 4 (15%) |
|
| ||
| 0% | 15 (36%) | 9 (35%) |
| <50% | 23 (55%) | 9 (35%) |
| >50% | 2 (5%) | 6 (23%) |
| Non-evaluable | 2 (5%) | 2 (8%) |
| Positive CD117 staining | 42 (100%) | 26 (100%) |
Median and range.
Figure 2Distribution of the patients according to the outcome.
Prognostic factors after curative surgery and outcome of patients according to the type of exon 11 deletion
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Number of resected GISTs at diagnosis | 32 | 16 |
|
| ||
| <2 | 1 (3%) | 0 |
| 2–5 | 7 (22%) | 6 (37.5%) |
| 5–10 | 13 (41%) | 2 (12.5%) |
| >10 | 11 (34%) | 8 (50%) |
|
| ||
| <5 | 8 (25%) | 8 (50%) |
| 6–10 | 4 (12.5%) | 2 (12.5%) |
| >10 | 20 (62.5%) | 6 (37.5%) |
| Very low | 0 | 0 |
| Low | 2 (6%) | 4 (25%) |
| Intermediate | 4 (13%) | 2 (12.5%) |
| High | 26 (81%) | 10 (62.5%) |
| Very low | 2 (6%) | 1 (6%) |
| Low | 3 (9%) | 3 (19%) |
| Intermediate | 6 (19%) | 1 (6%) |
| High | 20 (63%) | 11 (69%) |
| Non-evaluable | 1 (3%) | 0 |
|
| ||
| No | 15 (47%) | 7 (44%) |
| Yes | 17 (53%) | 9 (56%) |
|
| ||
| Peritoneum | 13 (76%) | 8 (89%) |
| Liver | 5 (29%) | 5 (56%) |
| Lung | 1 (6%) | 0 |
Some patients had two sites of relapse.
Figure 3(A) Relapse-free survival according to the type of exon 11 deletion. (B) Progression-free survival under imatinib according to the type of exon 11 deletion. (C) Overall survival under imatinib according to the type of exon 11 deletion.
Outcome under imatinib according to the type of exon 11 deletion
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Treatment by imatinib for patients with a non-resectable or metastatic GIST during follow-up | ( | ( |
| No | 5 (19%) | 5 (26%) |
| Yes | 22 (81%) | 14 (74%) |
|
| ||
| Complete response | 1 (5%) | 1 (7%) |
| Partial response | 9 (41%) | 4 (29%) |
| Stable disease | 12 (55%) | 9 (64%) |
| Progressive disease | 0 | 0 |
| Number of patients who had secondary resistance to imatinib during follow-up | 11 (50%) | 6 (43%) |
| Number of patients dead at the end of follow-up | 14 (33%) | 10 (38%) |
|
| ||
| GIST | 8 (57%) | 8 (80%) |
| Others | 6 (43%) | 2 (20%) |