Literature DB >> 19536093

Prognosis and predictive value of KIT exon 11 deletion in GISTs.

J-B Bachet1, I Hostein, A Le Cesne, S Brahimi, A Beauchet, S Tabone-Eglinger, F Subra, B Bui, F Duffaud, P Terrier, J-M Coindre, J-Y Blay, J-F Emile.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: KIT exon 11 mutations are observed in 60% of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Exon 11 codes for residues Tyr568 and Tyr570, which play a major role in signal transduction and degradation of KIT. Our aim was to compare the outcome of patients with deletion of both Tyr568-570 (delTyr) and the most frequent deletion delWK557-558 (delWK).
METHODS: Pathology and clinical characteristics of 68 patients with delTyr (n=26) or delWK (n=42) were reviewed and compared.
RESULTS: GISTs with delTyr were more frequently extragastric than those with delWK (69 vs 26%, P<0.0005). After curative surgery, median relapse-free survival were 10.8 and 11.1 months for patients with delTyr (n=14) and delWK (n=29), respectively (P=0.92). All patients treated with imatinib for a non-resectable or metastatic GIST had an objective response (n=15) or a stable disease (n=21) as best response, regardless of mutation. Median progression-free survival with imatinib were 21.9 and 18.9 months for patients with GIST with delTyr (n=14) and delWK (n=22), respectively (P=0.43).
CONCLUSION: In this large retrospective series, the type of KIT exon 11 mutation was correlated with the origin of GIST, but not with prognosis or response to imatinib.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19536093      PMCID: PMC2713701          DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most frequent mesenchymal tumours of the digestive tract and occur typically in the stomach for two-third or in the small intestine for 25% in most series (Emile ). Gain of function mutations of either KIT or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha polypeptide (PDGFRA) receptor tyrosine kinases play a critical role in GIST pathogenesis, and are found in 85% of GISTs (Rubin ). Many types of gain of function mutations of KIT and PDGFRA have been described in GISTs, but 60% occurred within the exon 11 of KIT (Corless ; Emile ), which comprises 33 codons (codons 550–582). The two tyrosines Tyr568 and Tyr570, first residues to be phosphorylated during activation, are consensus sites for binding of Src family kinases and could be implicated in activation of different signalling pathways (Roskoski, 2005). More than 90 mutations of exon 11 have been published, and consist in insertions, substitutions and deletions; however, delWK557–558, in the proximal part of exon 11, is the most frequent, accounting for 8–25% of KIT exon 11 mutations. Others deletions, in the distal part of the exon, include in particular deletions of Tyr568 and/or Tyr570, and may thus have more specific effects on KIT signalling pathways and degradation. Such deletions account for 3–8% of exon 11 mutations in published series (Ernst ; Taniguchi ; Debiec-Rychter , 2006; Wardelmann ; Martin ; Penzel ; Andersson ; Emile ; DeMatteo ). After surgical resection, the type of KIT mutations may be a prognostic factor of relapse. KIT exon 11 deletions and deletions affecting codons 557–558 of KIT exon 11 were described to be independent adverse prognostic factors in patients with GIST (Wardelmann ; Martin ; DeMatteo ). Conversely, in another study, GISTs in which the last part of exon 11 (codons 562–579) was deleted were most frequently associated with malignancy than GISTs with deletion of the first part of exon 11 (codons 550–561; Emile , 2006). So, the prognostic value of some types of KIT exon 11 mutations for risk of relapse is still debated. The mutational status of KIT or PDGFRA is predictive of clinical response to imatinib (Glivec, Gleevec, Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) and best results are obtained in patients with GISTs harbouring KIT exon 11 mutations (Heinrich ; Debiec-Rychter ). Nevertheless, the role of the type of KIT exon 11 mutations for the response and survival under imatinib remains to be determined. Thus, to better understand the prognostic significance of the type of KIT exon 11 deletions, we have compared the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with GIST and deletion of both Tyr568 and Tyr570 with the most frequent deletion of KIT exon 11, delWK557–558.

Materials and methods

Patient selection

From database of two French pathology departments which detect KIT and PDGFRA mutations in routine practice (Ambroise Pare Hospital, Boulogne; Bergonie Institute, Bordeaux, France), we searched retrospectively for all consecutive patients with GIST and with either delWK or deletions including both residues Tyr568 and Tyr570 (delTyr). Mutations within exon 9, 11, 13 and 17 of KIT and within exon 12 and 18 of PDGFRA were detected as previously described (Emile , 2004; Heinrich ; Hostein ).

Pathology

All samples were obtained before treatment with imatinib. Paraffin-embedded samples were independently analysed by at least two pathologists. For resected GIST, largest tumour diameter and mitotic count per 50 high-power fields (HPF) were evaluated after surgery in each case, as recommended by international criteria and used to evaluate the risk of GIST malignancy (Fletcher ; Miettinen and Lasota, 2006). Immunohistochemistry was performed with anti-CD117 (A-4502, polyclonal; DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark).

Clinical data and survival analysis

Medical records of all patients were retrospectively reviewed. Response rates to imatinib were evaluated by spiral computerised tomography according to the RECIST criteria. The relapse-free survival (RFS) was defined as the time between the date of curative surgery and the date of relapse. The progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the first day of imatinib and the date of progression or death. Overall survival (OS) under imatinib was defined as the time between the first day of imatinib and the date of death or last follow-up.

Statistical analysis

Results are expressed as medians and ranges. The cut-off date for the final analysis was 15 January 2008. We used Student's t-test to compare quantitative data in univariate analyses and χ2-tests were used for qualitative data. We estimated RFS, PFS and OS using the Kaplan–Meier method, and we used log-rank tests to compare the survival curves (Kaplan and Meier, 1958). SAS software v 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical analysis.

Results

Mutation, clinical and pathologic characteristics

A total of 68 patients with GIST, diagnosed between 1985 and 2007, and all CD117 positive, were retrieved. DelWK and delTyr accounted for 18% (34/185) and 10% (19/185) of KIT exon 11 mutations in Ambroise Paré's series, respectively. Out of the 26 delTyr mutations, 8 also involved both amino acids 557 and 558, and one involved the amino acid 558. Details of delTyr mutations are summarised in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Type and position of deletions including both tyrosines Tyr568 and Tyr570.

GISTs with delTyr were more frequently extragastric than those with delWK (69 vs 26%, P<0.0005), whereas other clinical and tumour characteristics were not different (Table 1). After exclusion of the 8 GISTs with delTyr including the 2 amino acids 557 and 558, GISTs with delTyr (n=18) were still more frequently extragastric (P=0.0031).
Table 1

Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients according to the type of exon 11 deletion

Type of exon 11 deletion DelWK557–558 DelTyr
Number of patients4226
   
Age at diagnosis (years)a58 (19–93)63 (44–86)
   
Sex   
 Male22 (52%)16 (62.5%)
 Female20 (48%)10 (37.5%)
   
Stage of the disease at diagnosis
 Resectable32 (76%)16 (61%)
 Non-resectable2 (5%)1 (4%)
 Metastatic8 (19%)9 (35%)
   
Location of the primary tumour   
 Stomach31 (74%)8 (31%)
 Small Intestine8 (19%)15 (58%)
 Colon/rectum3 (7%)3 (11%)
   
Histologic phenotype   
 Spindle type31 (74%)21 (80%)
 Epithelioid type3 (7%)1 (4%)
 Mixed type8 (19%)4 (15%)
   
Percent of necrosis   
 0%15 (36%)9 (35%)
 <50%23 (55%)9 (35%)
 >50%2 (5%)6 (23%)
 Non-evaluable2 (5%)2 (8%)
Positive CD117 staining42 (100%)26 (100%)

Median and range.

Distribution of patients according to the outcome and the type of KIT exon 11 deletion is described in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Distribution of the patients according to the outcome.

Relapse-free survival

Mitotic count, tumour size and risk classifications were not different between patients with delWK and those with delTyr (Table 2). At the date of cut-off, median time since curative surgery was 5.1 years (range 0.4–21.9 years). Three patients with delWK and two patients with delTyr had been included in an adjuvant prospective trial with imatinib, and were excluded of RFS analysis. Median RFS were 11.1 months (95% CI: 9.4–66.6) and 10.8 months (95% CI: 7.1–57.7; P=0.92; Figure 3A), respectively. Results were not modified after exclusion of the eight GISTs with delTyr including the two amino acids 557 and 558 (P=0.45).
Table 2

Prognostic factors after curative surgery and outcome of patients according to the type of exon 11 deletion

Type of exon 11 deletion DelWK557–558 DelTyr
Number of resected GISTs at diagnosis3216
   
Largest tumour diameter (cm)   
 <21 (3%)0
 2–57 (22%)6 (37.5%)
 5–1013 (41%)2 (12.5%)
 >1011 (34%)8 (50%)
   
Mitotic count per 50 HPF   
 <58 (25%)8 (50%)
 6–104 (12.5%)2 (12.5%)
 >1020 (62.5%)6 (37.5%)
   
Risk stage (Fletcher et al, 2002)
 Very low00
 Low2 (6%)4 (25%)
 Intermediate4 (13%)2 (12.5%)
 High26 (81%)10 (62.5%)
   
Risk stage (Miettinen and Lasota, 2006)
 Very low2 (6%)1 (6%)
 Low3 (9%)3 (19%)
 Intermediate6 (19%)1 (6%)
 High20 (63%)11 (69%)
 Non-evaluable1 (3%)0
   
Relapse after curative surgery for patients with a resectable GIST at diagnosis (number of patients)
 No15 (47%)7 (44%)
 Yes17 (53%)9 (56%)
   
Relapse location after curative surgery a
 Peritoneum13 (76%)8 (89%)
 Liver5 (29%)5 (56%)
 Lung1 (6%)0

Some patients had two sites of relapse.

Figure 3

(A) Relapse-free survival according to the type of exon 11 deletion. (B) Progression-free survival under imatinib according to the type of exon 11 deletion. (C) Overall survival under imatinib according to the type of exon 11 deletion.

Objective response and survival under imatinib

During follow-up, 22 patients with delWK and 14 patients with delTyr received imatinib (Figure 2). Out of these 36 patients, 26 (72%) had been included and evaluated in a prospective trial. At the date of cut-off, median time since imatinib beginning was 4.7 years (range 0.7–6.8 years). Objective responses to imatinib were not different between patients with delWK and those with delTyr (Table 3). Median PFS under imatinib were 18.9 months (95% CI: 12.6– ) for patients with delWK and 21.9 months (95% CI: 16.1–37.4) for patients with delTyr (P=0.43; Figure 3B). Median OS since imatinib beginning were 31.4 months (95% CI: 19.7–) and 38.6 months (95% CI: 35.4–45.3; P=0.31; Figure 3C), respectively. After exclusion of the 8 GISTs with delTyr including the two amino acids 557 and 558, results were not modified for median PFS (P=0.60) and OS (P=0.39).
Table 3

Outcome under imatinib according to the type of exon 11 deletion

Type of exon 11 deletion DelWK557–558 DelTyr
Treatment by imatinib for patients with a non-resectable or metastatic GIST during follow-up(n=27)(n=19)
 No5 (19%)5 (26%)
 Yes22 (81%)14 (74%)
   
Best response under imatinib (RECIST criteria)
 Complete response1 (5%)1 (7%)
 Partial response9 (41%)4 (29%)
 Stable disease12 (55%)9 (64%)
Progressive disease00
   
Number of patients who had secondary resistance to imatinib during follow-up11 (50%)6 (43%)
Number of patients dead at the end of follow-up14 (33%)10 (38%)
   
Cause of death   
 GIST8 (57%)8 (80%)
 Others6 (43%)2 (20%)

Discussion

KIT exon 11 mutations are present in the majority of GISTs. Many different types of mutations have been published, some of which delete residues Tyr568 and Tyr570, which play an important role in KIT signal transduction. Thus, we compared these mutations (delTyr) with the most frequent mutation of KIT exon 11 in GISTs (delWK557–558). Analysis of our large series of patients shows that GISTs with delWK are mainly gastric, whereas GISTs with delTyr are mainly intestinal. However, GISTs with these mutations had identical prognosis after curative surgery and response to imatinib treatment. Previous studies described that the GIST's location was associated with type of mutation. GISTs with KIT exon 9 mutation arise predominantly in small intestine and colon, and those with PDGFRA mutations most often originate from the stomach (Emile ; Wardelmann ; Penzel ). Our results show that GISTs with delTyr arise in small intestine, colon or rectum in about 70% of cases, whereas those with delWK557–558 occur in stomach in about 75% of cases, and this difference was highly significant. This suggests possible different types of oncogenic events driving KIT mutations in the different parts of the digestive tract. Recently, some studies reported that GISTs with delWK557–558 have an increased risk of relapse after curative surgery (Wardelmann ; Martin ; DeMatteo ). In our study, GISTs with delWK557–558 and GISTs with delTyr did not differ for the risk of relapse after curative surgery and both convey a poor prognosis. According to tumour location, independently of the risk stage, a relapse occurred in 56% (14/25) and 75% (3/4) of gastric GISTs with delWK and delTyr, and in 40% (2/5) and 66.7% (6/9) of intestinal GISTs, respectively. So, GISTs with these mutations seem to have the same worse prognosis and gastric GIST with exon 11 mutations may be of the same poor prognosis as small bowel or large bowel GIST actually. The outcome of non-resectable and metastatic GISTs with delWK and delTyr under imatinib is similar in terms of response rates, PFS and OS. All patients included in our study had an objective response or a stable disease under imatinib, and median PFS were of about 20 months. These results are concordant with results of published phase III studies (Heinrich ; Debiec-Rychter ). In this large retrospective series, the type of KIT exon 11 mutation differed according to primary site, with delWK originating from the stomach, whereas those with delTyr from the intestine. However, GISTs with these mutations had the same prognosis after curative surgery and under imatinib.
  20 in total

1.  Prognostic value of KIT exon 11 deletions in GISTs.

Authors:  Jean-François Emile; Séverine Tabone-Eglinger; Nathalie Théou-Anton; Antoinette Lemoine
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 2.  Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Jerzy Lasota
Journal:  Semin Diagn Pathol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  Length analysis of polymerase chain reaction products: a sensitive and reliable technique for the detection of mutations in KIT exon 11 in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Jean-François Emile; Antoinette Lemoine; Nathalie Bienfait; Philippe Terrier; Daniel Azoulay; Brigitte Debuire
Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol       Date:  2002-06

4.  Deletion of Trp-557 and Lys-558 in the juxtamembrane domain of the c-kit protooncogene is associated with metastatic behavior of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Eva Wardelmann; Inge Losen; Volkmar Hans; Iris Neidt; Nicola Speidel; Erhard Bierhoff; Thomas Heinicke; Torsten Pietsch; Reinhard Büttner; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Tumor mitotic rate, size, and location independently predict recurrence after resection of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST).

Authors:  Ronald P Dematteo; Jason S Gold; Lisa Saran; Mithat Gönen; Kui Hin Liau; Robert G Maki; Samuel Singer; Peter Besmer; Murray F Brennan; Cristina R Antonescu
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Association of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha mutations with gastric primary site and epithelioid or mixed cell morphology in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Eva Wardelmann; Aksana Hrychyk; Sabine Merkelbach-Bruse; Katharina Pauls; Jennifer Goldstein; Peter Hohenberger; Inge Losen; Christoph Manegold; Reinhard Büttner; Torsten Pietsch
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 7.  Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A consensus approach.

Authors:  Christopher D M Fletcher; Jules J Berman; Christopher Corless; Fred Gorstein; Jerzy Lasota; B Jack Longley; Markku Miettinen; Timothy J O'Leary; Helen Remotti; Brian P Rubin; Barry Shmookler; Leslie H Sobin; Sharon W Weiss
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Clinicopathologic, phenotypic, and genotypic characteristics of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors.

Authors:  Jean-François Emile; Nathalie Théou; Séverine Tabone; Annie Cortez; Philippe Terrier; Marie-Thérèse Chaumette; Catherine Julié; Philippe Bertheau; Anne Lavergne-Slove; Jean Donadieu; Alain Barrier; Axel Le Cesne; Brigitte Debuire; Antoinette Lemoine
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  Use of c-KIT/PDGFRA mutational analysis to predict the clinical response to imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours entered on phase I and II studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group.

Authors:  M Debiec-Rychter; H Dumez; I Judson; B Wasag; J Verweij; M Brown; S Dimitrijevic; R Sciot; M Stul; H Vranck; M Scurr; A Hagemeijer; M van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Kinase mutations and imatinib response in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Authors:  Michael C Heinrich; Christopher L Corless; George D Demetri; Charles D Blanke; Margaret von Mehren; Heikki Joensuu; Laura S McGreevey; Chang-Jie Chen; Annick D Van den Abbeele; Brian J Druker; Beate Kiese; Burton Eisenberg; Peter J Roberts; Samuel Singer; Christopher D M Fletcher; Sandra Silberman; Sasa Dimitrijevic; Jonathan A Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  19 in total

1.  Frequencies of KIT and PDGFRA mutations in the MolecGIST prospective population-based study differ from those of advanced GISTs.

Authors:  J F Emile; S Brahimi; J M Coindre; P P Bringuier; G Monges; P Samb; L Doucet; I Hostein; B Landi; M P Buisine; A Neuville; O Bouché; P Cervera; J L Pretet; J Tisserand; A Gauthier; A Le Cesne; J C Sabourin; J Y Scoazec; S Bonvalot; C L Corless; M C Heinrich; J Y Blay; P Aegerter
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Prognostic value of mutational characteristics in gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a single-center experience in 275 cases.

Authors:  Ming Wang; Jia Xu; Wenyi Zhao; Lin Tu; Weiqing Qiu; Chaojie Wang; Yangyin Shen; Qiang Liu; Hui Cao
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Treatment of refractory gastrointestinal stromal tumor using pazopanib.

Authors:  Irvin C Lien; Seth M Pollack
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-29

4.  Effects of endoplasmic reticulum stressors on maturation and signaling of hemizygous and heterozygous wild-type and mutant forms of KIT.

Authors:  Sabrina Brahimi-Adouane; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Séverine Tabone-Eglinger; Frédéric Subra; Claude Capron; Jean-Yves Blay; Jean-François Emile
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Molecular characterization of an Italian series of sporadic GISTs.

Authors:  P Origone; S Gargiulo; L Mastracci; A Ballestrero; L Battistuzzi; C Casella; D Comandini; R Cusano; A P Dei Tos; R Fiocca; A Garuti; P Ghiorzo; C Martinuzzi; L Toffolatti; G Bianchi Scarrà
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Imprint cytology in tumor tissue bank quality control: an efficient method to evaluate tumor necrosis and to detect samples without tumor cells.

Authors:  Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette; Noura Touibi; Pierre-Yves Boëlle; Emmanuel Tiret; Jean-François Fléjou; Dominique Wendum
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-02-27       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  [Pathology and molecular biology of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST)].

Authors:  H-U Schildhaus; S Merkelbach-Bruse; R Büttner; E Wardelmann
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Coexistence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors and gastric adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Yan Yan; Ziyu Li; Yiqiang Liu; Lianhai Zhang; Jiyou Li; Jiafu Ji
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-01-03

9.  Diagnostic criteria, specific mutations, and genetic predisposition in gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Jean-François Emile
Journal:  Appl Clin Genet       Date:  2010-10-29

10.  Gene expression patterns of hemizygous and heterozygous KIT mutations suggest distinct oncogenic pathways: a study in NIH3T3 cell lines and GIST samples.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Séverine Tabone-Eglinger; Sophie Dessaux; Anthony Besse; Sabrina Brahimi-Adouane; Jean-François Emile; Jean-Yves Blay; Laurent Alberti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.