Literature DB >> 19535716

The analgesic properties of scalp infiltrations with ropivacaine after intracranial tumoral resection.

Hélène Batoz1, Olivier Verdonck, Christelle Pellerin, Gaëlle Roux, Pierre Maurette.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The issue of postoperative pain after neurosurgery is controversial. It has been reported as mild to moderate and its treatment may be inadequate. Infiltration of the surgical site with local anesthetics has provided transient benefit after craniotomy, but its effect on chronic pain has not been evaluated. Accordingly, we designed the present study to test the hypothesis that ropivacaine infiltration of the scalp reduces acute and persistent postoperative pain after intracranial tumor resection.
METHODS: This was a prospective, single-blinded study. Inclusion criteria were intracranial tumor resection, age > or = 18 or < or = 80 yr, and ability to understand and use a visual analog scale (VAS). Exclusion criteria were history of craniotomy, chronic drug abuse, and neurologic disorders. All eligible patients were randomly included in Group I (infiltration) or C (control). Postoperative analgesia was IV acetaminophen combined with nalbuphine. At the end of the surgery, Group I received an infiltration of the surgical site with 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.75%. Acute pain was evaluated hourly by VAS during the first 24 h. The analgesic effect of ropivacaine was evaluated based on total consumption of nalbuphine and VAS scores. The incidence of persistent pain and neuropathic pain was assessed at the 2-mo postoperative evaluation. We used the Student's t-test to compare total nalbuphine consumption, repeated measures analysis of variance with post hoc Bonferroni t-test for VAS score and the Fisher's exact test for chronic and neuropathic pain.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were enrolled, 25 in Group I and 27 in Group C. Demographic and intraoperative data were similar between groups. Group I showed a nonsignificant trend toward reduced nalbuphine consumption during the first postoperative day, 11.2 +/- 9.2 mg vs 16.6 +/- 11.0 mg for Group C (mean +/- SD, P = 0.054). VAS scores were significantly higher in Group C. Two months after surgery, persistent pain was significantly lower in Group I, 2/24 (8%) vs 14/25 (56%), P = 0.0003. One patient (4.1%) in Group I versus six (25%) patients in Group C (P = 0.04) experienced neuropathic pain.
CONCLUSIONS: Because pain is moderate after intracranial tumor resection, there is limited interest in scalp infiltrations with ropivacaine in the acute postoperative period. Nevertheless, these infiltrations may be relevant for the rehabilitation of neurosurgical patients and their quality of life by limiting the development of persistent pain and particularly neuropathic pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19535716     DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a4928d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  23 in total

Review 1.  Postcraniotomy headache.

Authors:  Levente Molnár; Éva Simon; Réka Nemes; Béla Fülesdi; Csilla Molnár
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia for preventing chronic pain after surgery.

Authors:  Michael H Andreae; Doerthe A Andreae
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 3.  Integrative review: postcraniotomy pain in the brain tumour patient.

Authors:  Rebecca Elizabeth Guilkey; Diane Von Ah; Janet S Carpenter; Cynthia Stone; Claire B Draucker
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.187

4.  Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of acute postoperative pain in adults following brain surgery.

Authors:  Imelda M Galvin; Ron Levy; Andrew G Day; Ian Gilron
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-11-21

5.  Comparison of Continuous Femoral Nerve Block versus Local Infiltration Analgesia as a Postoperative Analgesia in Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Deepika Chaubey; Hari Krishan Mahajan; Parshu Ram Chauhan; Preeti S Govind; Pushpinder Singh; Ravinder Dhanevar; Abhinav Gupta
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-07-01

Review 6.  Perioperative interventions to reduce chronic postsurgical pain.

Authors:  Ian Carroll; Jennifer Hah; Sean Mackey; Einar Ottestad; Jiang Ti Kong; Sam Lahidji; Vivianne Tawfik; Jarred Younger; Catherine Curtin
Journal:  J Reconstr Microsurg       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 2.873

Review 7.  Research design considerations for chronic pain prevention clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Jennifer S Gewandter; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; John T Farrar; Roger B Fillingim; Ian Gilron; John D Markman; Anne Louise Oaklander; Michael J Polydefkis; Srinivasa N Raja; James P Robinson; Clifford J Woolf; Dan Ziegler; Michael A Ashburn; Laurie B Burke; Penney Cowan; Steven Z George; Veeraindar Goli; Ole X Graff; Smriti Iyengar; Gary W Jay; Joel Katz; Henrik Kehlet; Rachel A Kitt; Ernest A Kopecky; Richard Malamut; Michael P McDermott; Pamela Palmer; Bob A Rappaport; Christine Rauschkolb; Ilona Steigerwald; Jeffrey Tobias; Gary A Walco
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 8.  Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children.

Authors:  Erica J Weinstein; Jacob L Levene; Marc S Cohen; Doerthe A Andreae; Jerry Y Chao; Matthew Johnson; Charles B Hall; Michael H Andreae
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-20

9.  Pain Quality Among Hospitalized Postcraniotomy Brain Tumor Patients.

Authors:  Rebecca E Foust Winton; Claire B Draucker; Diane Von Ah
Journal:  Clin Nurse Spec       Date:  2021 May-Jun 01       Impact factor: 1.143

Review 10.  Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children.

Authors:  Erica J Weinstein; Jacob L Levene; Marc S Cohen; Doerthe A Andreae; Jerry Y Chao; Matthew Johnson; Charles B Hall; Michael H Andreae
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.