Literature DB >> 19535658

Trends and determinants of prescription medication use for treatment of osteoporosis.

Joel F Farley1, Susan J Blalock.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Trends in the use of different treatments for osteoporosis among the civilian, ambulatory U.S. population are described.
METHODS: Data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) were used to estimate osteoporosis prevalence and treatment rates among individuals ages 50 years and older who self-reported having osteoporosis. Specific pharmacologic treatments analyzed included oral and transdermal estrogen and estrogen and progesterone combination products in women, injectable and transdermal testosterone products in men, oral bisphosphonate medications, raloxifene, and nasal calcitonin. Predisposing characteristics included sex, age, education, income, and race. Required characteristics included the use of an oral corticosteroid medication, having a fracture in the current MEPS year, presently smoking, and self-report of fair or poor health status.
RESULTS: Self-report of osteoporosis increased steadily from approximately 3.2 million patients in 1999 to 7.2 million patients in 2005. This was associated with an increase of the number of patients who used medication for the treatment of osteoporosis from 2.3 million in 1999 to 5.6 million in 2005. Although medication use increased over time, only 77% of people with osteoporosis reported using medication for the treatment of osteoporosis in the previous year. Only 25.4% of men, 55.6% of blacks, 64.2% of patients without a usual source of health care, and 66.8% of patients who reported their health as fair or poor used medication for the treatment of osteoporosis in the previous year.
CONCLUSION: Although the MEPS data are based on patient self-report, the results from our study suggest that approximately one in four patients with osteoporosis did not receive prescription management for this condition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19535658     DOI: 10.2146/ajhp080248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Syst Pharm        ISSN: 1079-2082            Impact factor:   2.637


  6 in total

1.  What information can the lay public find about osteoporosis treatment? A descriptive study coding the content and quality of bisphosphonate information on the internet.

Authors:  L N Fuzzell; M J Richards; L Fraenkel; S L Stark; M C Politi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Quinone Methide Bioactivation Pathway: Contribution to Toxicity and/or Cytoprotection?

Authors:  Judy L Bolton
Journal:  Curr Org Chem       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 2.180

3.  Trends in fracture incidence: a population-based study over 20 years.

Authors:  Shreyasee Amin; Sara J Achenbach; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Sundeep Khosla; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.741

4.  Osteoporosis screening, prevention, and treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus: application of the systemic lupus erythematosus quality indicators.

Authors:  Gabriela Schmajuk; Edward Yelin; Eliza Chakravarty; Lorene M Nelson; Pantelis Panopolis; Jinoos Yazdany
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  Secular trends in the incidence of primary hyperparathyroidism over five decades (1965-2010).

Authors:  Marcio L Griebeler; Ann E Kearns; Euijung Ryu; Matthew A Hathcock; L Joseph Melton; Robert A Wermers
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Cumulative network-meta-analyses, practice guidelines and actual prescriptions of drug treatments for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a study protocol for cumulative network meta-analyses and meta-epidemiological study.

Authors:  Yuki Kataoka; Yan Luo; Anna Chaimani; Akira Onishi; Miho Kimachi; Yasushi Tsujimoto; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Tianjing Li; Andrea Cipriani; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.