Literature DB >> 19535370

Variation in withholding of information in three monkey species.

Federica Amici1, Josep Call, Filippo Aureli.   

Abstract

Studies on tactical deception have reported that informed subordinates can withhold information from naive dominants, but they have not directly compared species' performance. Here, we compared the performance in two withholding-of-information tasks of three monkey species differing in the strictness of their dominance hierarchy and degree of fission-fusion dynamics: spider monkeys, capuchin monkeys and long-tailed macaques. Food was hidden from the dominants' view either inside an opaque box or in a transparent box that could only be opened by knowledgeable subordinates. All species were capable of withholding information, with subjects refraining from interacting with the box when the dominant was nearby. Spider monkeys were the most efficient at retrieving food, by timing it when the dominant was far from the box. Capuchin monkeys were also quite efficient when alone at the box, but they lost much of the food when manipulating the box with the dominant nearby. The results supported our predictions based on interspecific differences in the strictness of the dominance hierarchy and the degree of fission-fusion dynamics, with the former constraining the subjects' tendency to approach the box and the latter affecting the subjects' tendency to wait for the appropriate situation to retrieve the food.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19535370      PMCID: PMC2817172          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  18 in total

1.  Training squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) to deceive: acquisition and analysis of behavior toward cooperative and competitive trainers.

Authors:  J R Anderson; H Kuroshima; H Kuwahata; K Fujita; S J Vick
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.231

2.  Neocortex size predicts deception rate in primates.

Authors:  Richard W Byrne; Nadia Corp
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Fission-fusion dynamics, behavioral flexibility, and inhibitory control in primates.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Filippo Aureli; Josep Call
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Can competitive paradigms increase the validity of experiments on primate social cognition?

Authors:  B Hare
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2001-06-02       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Inferences about guessing and knowing by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Authors:  D J Povinelli; K E Nelson; S T Boysen
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.231

6.  Learning to outwit a competitor in mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus torquatus).

Authors:  S Coussi-Korbel
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.231

Review 7.  Getting back to the rough ground: deception and 'social living'.

Authors:  Vasudevi Reddy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus lunulatus) solve the reverse contingency task without a modified procedure.

Authors:  Anna Albiach-Serrano; Federico Guillén-Salazar; Josep Call
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.084

9.  Can brown lemurs (Eulemur fulvus) learn to deceive a human competitor?

Authors:  Emilie Genty; Jane Foltz; Jean-Jacques Roeder
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Leading a conspecific away from food in ravens (Corvus corax)?

Authors:  Thomas Bugnyar; Kurt Kotrschal
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 3.084

View more
  6 in total

1.  How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology.

Authors:  Evan L MacLean; Luke J Matthews; Brian A Hare; Charles L Nunn; Rindy C Anderson; Filippo Aureli; Elizabeth M Brannon; Josep Call; Christine M Drea; Nathan J Emery; Daniel B M Haun; Esther Herrmann; Lucia F Jacobs; Michael L Platt; Alexandra G Rosati; Aaron A Sandel; Kara K Schroepfer; Amanda M Seed; Jingzhi Tan; Carel P van Schaik; Victoria Wobber
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  Variation in communicative complexity in relation to social structure and organization in non-human primates.

Authors:  Filippo Aureli; Colleen M Schaffner; Gabriele Schino
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  The effect of domestication on inhibitory control: wolves and dogs compared.

Authors:  Sarah Marshall-Pescini; Zsófia Virányi; Friederike Range
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Social inhibition and behavioural flexibility when the context changes: a comparison across six primate species.

Authors:  Federica Amici; Josep Call; Julia Watzek; Sarah Brosnan; Filippo Aureli
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Goats (Capra hircus) From Different Selection Lines Differ in Their Behavioural Flexibility.

Authors:  Christian Nawroth; Katrina Rosenberger; Nina M Keil; Jan Langbein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-01

6.  Tactical deception to hide sexual behaviour: macaques use distance, not visibility.

Authors:  A M Overduin-de Vries; B M Spruijt; H de Vries; E H M Sterck
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.980

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.