Jaya Ahuja1. 1. Department of Non Medical Prescribing, London South Bank University, London SE1 0AA, UK. j.ahuja@lsbu.ac.uk
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the learning experience of non medical prescribing (NMP) students during their period of learning in practice and to explore strategies for improvement. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from two consecutive NMP student cohorts. RESULTS: Of 57 NMP students, the majority (64.9%) worked in primary care setting. In contrast to those from primary care setting, the students working in secondary/tertiary care setting had significantly greater chance of knowing their designated medical practitioner (DMP) prior to starting their course (p=0.044). However, this did not influence whether the student did a learning agreement and time schedule agreement with the DMP at the beginning of practice setting. A learning agreement and time schedule was done by 91.2% and 57.9% students, respectively, at beginning of the course. Prior time schedule agreement was a significant determinant in determining the number of hours that student spent subsequently under direct supervision of DMP: 75.8% of those who did a prior time schedule spent >30% of practice hours under the direct supervision of DMP as compared to only 50% of those who did not. Spending >30% of the practice hours under direct supervision of the DMP was significantly associated with student satisfaction (p=0.025). There was greater likelihood of a student being assessed formatively if a prior learning agreement had been done (p=0.035) resulting in increased student satisfaction. Time and workload constraints, organisational issues and peer support emerged as barriers to student learning. Students commented on difficulties in getting doctors as a DMP; and therefore suggested that learning experience can be enhanced if a qualified practicing Non Medical Prescriber could act as a "co-mentor". There were also suggestions of providing incentives to doctors and giving them more information about the role of NMP to encourage more doctors to act as DMP. CONCLUSIONS: Learning agreement and a time schedule with DMP at the beginning of the supervised period in practice significantly improved the students' learning experience, and was a major determinant of subsequent student satisfaction. Those who spent at least 30% of practice development time under direct supervision of their DMP were likely to be more satisfied with the learning process.
AIMS: To evaluate the learning experience of non medical prescribing (NMP) students during their period of learning in practice and to explore strategies for improvement. METHODS: A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data from two consecutive NMP student cohorts. RESULTS: Of 57 NMP students, the majority (64.9%) worked in primary care setting. In contrast to those from primary care setting, the students working in secondary/tertiary care setting had significantly greater chance of knowing their designated medical practitioner (DMP) prior to starting their course (p=0.044). However, this did not influence whether the student did a learning agreement and time schedule agreement with the DMP at the beginning of practice setting. A learning agreement and time schedule was done by 91.2% and 57.9% students, respectively, at beginning of the course. Prior time schedule agreement was a significant determinant in determining the number of hours that student spent subsequently under direct supervision of DMP: 75.8% of those who did a prior time schedule spent >30% of practice hours under the direct supervision of DMP as compared to only 50% of those who did not. Spending >30% of the practice hours under direct supervision of the DMP was significantly associated with student satisfaction (p=0.025). There was greater likelihood of a student being assessed formatively if a prior learning agreement had been done (p=0.035) resulting in increased student satisfaction. Time and workload constraints, organisational issues and peer support emerged as barriers to student learning. Students commented on difficulties in getting doctors as a DMP; and therefore suggested that learning experience can be enhanced if a qualified practicing Non Medical Prescriber could act as a "co-mentor". There were also suggestions of providing incentives to doctors and giving them more information about the role of NMP to encourage more doctors to act as DMP. CONCLUSIONS: Learning agreement and a time schedule with DMP at the beginning of the supervised period in practice significantly improved the students' learning experience, and was a major determinant of subsequent student satisfaction. Those who spent at least 30% of practice development time under direct supervision of their DMP were likely to be more satisfied with the learning process.