Literature DB >> 19534840

The origins, evolution, and future of The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Mark Starr1, Iain Chalmers, Mike Clarke, Andrew D Oxman.   

Abstract

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) evolved in response to Archie Cochrane's challenge to the medical profession to assemble "a critical summary, adapted periodically, of all ... relevant randomized controlled trials". CDSR has been an electronic publication from its inception and this has meant that Cochrane reviews (i) need not be constrained by lack of space; (ii) can be updated as new information becomes available and when mistakes or other ways of improving them are identified; and (iii) can be cross-linked to other, related sources of relevant information. Although CDSR has become widely cited, it must continue to evolve in the light of technological and methodological developments, and in response to the needs of people making decisions about health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19534840     DOI: 10.1017/S026646230909062X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  23 in total

Review 1.  Steps in the undertaking of a systematic review in orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Dario Sambunjak; Miljenko Franić
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-12-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Systematic reviews and health policy: the influence of a project on perinatal care since 1988.

Authors:  Daniel M Fox
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Automatic identification of recent high impact clinical articles in PubMed to support clinical decision making using time-agnostic features.

Authors:  Jiantao Bian; Samir Abdelrahman; Jianlin Shi; Guilherme Del Fiol
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 4.  The Australian 'FORM' approach to guideline development: the quest for the perfect system.

Authors:  Philipp Dahm; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Seventy-five trials and eleven systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up?

Authors:  Hilda Bastian; Paul Glasziou; Iain Chalmers
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Characteristics of meta-analyses and their component studies in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: a cross-sectional, descriptive analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan Davey; Rebecca M Turner; Mike J Clarke; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  History of evidence synthesis to assess treatment effects: Personal reflections on something that is very much alive.

Authors:  Mike Clarke
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Knowledge bases and software support for variant interpretation in precision oncology.

Authors:  Florian Borchert; Andreas Mock; Aurelie Tomczak; Jonas Hügel; Samer Alkarkoukly; Alexander Knurr; Anna-Lena Volckmar; Albrecht Stenzinger; Peter Schirmacher; Jürgen Debus; Dirk Jäger; Thomas Longerich; Stefan Fröhling; Roland Eils; Nina Bougatf; Ulrich Sax; Matthieu-P Schapranow
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 11.622

9.  Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventions.

Authors:  Valerie Smith; Declan Devane; Cecily M Begley; Mike Clarke
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.615

10.  Dicing with chance, life and death in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: D.I.C.E. 3, a simulation study.

Authors:  Mike Clarke; Jim Halsey
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 5.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.