Literature DB >> 19534838

Development of health technology assessment in France.

Caroline Weill1, David Banta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the history of health technology assessment (HTA) in France.
METHODS: The approach was a descriptive review done by people who have been very much involved in this history.
RESULTS: The interest in HTA and evaluation as a tool for health decision making goes back to the 1970s in France. During the 1980s, there were several attempts to develop a national HTA agency, which finally came to fruition with the development of the Agence Nationale de l'Evaluation Medicale (ANDEM) in 1989. ANDEM's main success, perhaps, was in making HTA known in France by developing its own assessments, writing and validating appropriate methodologies for assessing medical technology and medical practices, and by organizing in France the development of programs of consensus development conferences, which the ANDEM either organized itself or supported and validated. In the mid-1990s, the mandate of ANDEM was extended to hospital accreditation and the agency's name was changed to Agence Nationale d'Accreditation et d'Evaluation en Sante (ANAES). Finally, in 2005, the National Authority for Health (HAS) was formed to consolidate efforts to centralize the programs of HTA, aiming at helping decision making regarding reimbursement and pricing, in one agency and to define the optimal use of health technology in France.
CONCLUSIONS: HTA has become a strong influence in the healthcare system in France. These developments may be considered rather typical of the approach to public policy questions in France, where regulation is more in use than in other countries (at least in the healthcare field). At the same time, this approach has made lobbying and other attempts to influence decisions common as well, so one might say that HTA is more politicized than in some other countries in Europe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19534838     DOI: 10.1017/S0266462309090503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  5 in total

1.  Role of centralized review processes for making reimbursement decisions on new health technologies in Europe.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Caroline Davis; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2011-08-30

2.  Management of Medical Technology under the New Medical Policy Background in China.

Authors:  Suo-Wei Wu; Tong Chen; Ming Wu; Qi Pan; Yong Xuan; Liang-Yu Wei; Qin Wang; Chao Li; Jing-Chen Song
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  Evidence-based decision-making for diagnostic and therapeutic methods: the changing landscape of assessment approaches in Germany.

Authors:  Britta Olberg; Sabine Fuchs; Katja Matthias; Alexandra Nolting; Matthias Perleth; Reinhard Busse
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-10-17

4.  Establishment of a Quantitative Medical Technology Evaluation System and Indicators within Medical Institutions.

Authors:  Suo-Wei Wu; Tong Chen; Qi Pan; Liang-Yu Wei; Qin Wang; Chao Li; Jing-Chen Song; Ji Luo
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 2.628

5.  Development and evolution of medical technology management in China.

Authors:  Suo-Wei Wu; Qi Pan; Tong Chen; Yuan-Yuan Ge; Ji Luo; Qin Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2019-07-20       Impact factor: 2.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.