BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The role of screening colonoscopy in an asymptomatic, average-risk population remains to be determined. Moreover, the value of screening colonoscopy in individuals older than 75 years and for right-sided lesions has recently been questioned. The aims were to assess: (i) the risk of colorectal neoplasia in a large consecutively screened asymptomatic average-risk population, aged 40-85 years; (ii) whether colonoscopy is better than sigmoidoscopy for primary screening; and (iii) the prevalence of right-sided lesions at different ages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study, analyzed data from 1563 consecutive, asymptomatic, average-risk individuals, aged 40-85 years, who underwent screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Overall, neoplastic lesions were detected in 262 individuals (17% of the study population), of whom 75 had advanced lesions (5% of population) and nine had colorectal cancers (CRC) (0.6% of population). The prevalence of all lesions increased with age, with the highest percentages in the > 75 age group (26.5% with neoplastic and 6 % with advanced lesions). Higher age was also associated with relatively more right-sided lesions. In particular the prevalence of proximal neoplasia, without concurrent distal neoplasia, increased from 5% in those < 50 years to 24% in those > 75 years. Those with distal lesions had a higher overall risk for proximal lesions (odds ratio [OR] 3.2); nevertheless flexible sigmoidoscopy alone would have missed up to 40% of all lesions and up to 3.5% of advanced neoplastic lesions in this patient subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic, average-risk individuals is mandatory, as noteworthy numbers of advanced colorectal neoplasias have been detected in all age groups, especially in those aged > 75. Most importantly, many of the detected lesions were proximal and would not be revealed by sigmoidoscopy alone.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The role of screening colonoscopy in an asymptomatic, average-risk population remains to be determined. Moreover, the value of screening colonoscopy in individuals older than 75 years and for right-sided lesions has recently been questioned. The aims were to assess: (i) the risk of colorectal neoplasia in a large consecutively screened asymptomatic average-risk population, aged 40-85 years; (ii) whether colonoscopy is better than sigmoidoscopy for primary screening; and (iii) the prevalence of right-sided lesions at different ages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study, analyzed data from 1563 consecutive, asymptomatic, average-risk individuals, aged 40-85 years, who underwent screening colonoscopy. RESULTS: Overall, neoplastic lesions were detected in 262 individuals (17% of the study population), of whom 75 had advanced lesions (5% of population) and nine had colorectal cancers (CRC) (0.6% of population). The prevalence of all lesions increased with age, with the highest percentages in the > 75 age group (26.5% with neoplastic and 6 % with advanced lesions). Higher age was also associated with relatively more right-sided lesions. In particular the prevalence of proximal neoplasia, without concurrent distal neoplasia, increased from 5% in those < 50 years to 24% in those > 75 years. Those with distal lesions had a higher overall risk for proximal lesions (odds ratio [OR] 3.2); nevertheless flexible sigmoidoscopy alone would have missed up to 40% of all lesions and up to 3.5% of advanced neoplastic lesions in this patient subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic, average-risk individuals is mandatory, as noteworthy numbers of advanced colorectal neoplasias have been detected in all age groups, especially in those aged > 75. Most importantly, many of the detected lesions were proximal and would not be revealed by sigmoidoscopy alone.
Authors: H S de Vries; D Boerma; R Timmer; B van Ramshorst; L A Dieleman; H L van Westreenen Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-02-01 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: A T George; C Davis; A Rangaraj; C Edwards; V L Chamary; H Khan; M Javed; P G Campbell; M C Allison; K J Swarnkar Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2010-09-23
Authors: Janice S Kwon; Jenna L Scott; C Blake Gilks; Molly S Daniels; Charlotte C Sun; Karen H Lu Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Danielle M Tholey; Corbett E Shelton; Gloria Francis; Archana Anantharaman; Robert A Frankel; Paurush Shah; Amy Coan; Sarah E Hegarty; Benjamin E Leiby; David M Kastenberg Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Ari Leshno; Menachem Moshkowitz; Maayan David; Lior Galazan; Alfred I Neugut; Nadir Arber; Erwin Santo Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-08-28 Impact factor: 5.742