R A Adler1, F W Hastings, V I Petkov. 1. McGuire Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23249, USA. Robert.adler@va.gov
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Men treated by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for localized prostate cancer are at risk for fracture, but it is not known which men require pharmacologic treatment. We found that 33% of men on ADT had osteoporosis of spine, hip, or forearm by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), thus requiring treatment. Using the new fracture prediction algorithm (FRAX) tool with corrected femoral neck T-score identified only 17% requiring treatment, and, if calculated without femoral neck, 54% were identified to need treatment. INTRODUCTION: Men treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate carcinoma live long enough to fracture. A new fracture prediction method, FRAX, is based on femoral neck DXA plus risk factors. Thus, DXA or FRAX could determine which men should receive osteoporosis therapy. METHODS: Of 115 men undergoing ADT referred for DXA testing, those with bone mineral density (BMD) in spine, hip, or forearm of >or=2.5 standard deviations below a normal male ethnicity-adjusted mean were considered treatment candidates. Using FRAX with and without femoral neck BMD, men were treatment candidates if the 10-year hip fracture risk was >or=3% or the major osteoporotic fracture risk was >or=20%. RESULTS: The men averaged 77 years old; 58% were African-American, and 14.8% were current smokers. Mean femoral neck T-score was -1.4. Using DXA, 38 (33%) men would need treatment. When FRAX was calculated including the femoral neck T-score, only 20 men met criteria for treatment. However, when FRAX was calculated without the T-score, 62 men met criteria for treatment. Overlap among the groups was surprisingly modest. CONCLUSIONS: DXA and FRAX identify different ADT men for treatment.
UNLABELLED: Men treated by androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for localized prostate cancer are at risk for fracture, but it is not known which men require pharmacologic treatment. We found that 33% of men on ADT had osteoporosis of spine, hip, or forearm by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), thus requiring treatment. Using the new fracture prediction algorithm (FRAX) tool with corrected femoral neck T-score identified only 17% requiring treatment, and, if calculated without femoral neck, 54% were identified to need treatment. INTRODUCTION:Men treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate carcinoma live long enough to fracture. A new fracture prediction method, FRAX, is based on femoral neck DXA plus risk factors. Thus, DXA or FRAX could determine which men should receive osteoporosis therapy. METHODS: Of 115 men undergoing ADT referred for DXA testing, those with bone mineral density (BMD) in spine, hip, or forearm of >or=2.5 standard deviations below a normal male ethnicity-adjusted mean were considered treatment candidates. Using FRAX with and without femoral neck BMD, men were treatment candidates if the 10-year hip fracture risk was >or=3% or the major osteoporotic fracture risk was >or=20%. RESULTS: The men averaged 77 years old; 58% were African-American, and 14.8% were current smokers. Mean femoral neck T-score was -1.4. Using DXA, 38 (33%) men would need treatment. When FRAX was calculated including the femoral neck T-score, only 20 men met criteria for treatment. However, when FRAX was calculated without the T-score, 62 men met criteria for treatment. Overlap among the groups was surprisingly modest. CONCLUSIONS: DXA and FRAX identify different ADTmen for treatment.
Authors: Amir Qaseem; Vincenza Snow; Paul Shekelle; Robert Hopkins; Mary Ann Forciea; Douglas K Owens Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2008-05-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Susan L Greenspan; Penelope Coates; Susan M Sereika; Joel B Nelson; Donald L Trump; Neil M Resnick Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2005-09-27 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: J Kathleen Tracy; Walter A Meyer; Mikayel Grigoryan; Bo Fan; Raymond H Flores; Harry K Genant; Charles Resnik; Marc C Hochberg Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2005-08-18 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: E Orwoll; M Ettinger; S Weiss; P Miller; D Kendler; J Graham; S Adami; K Weber; R Lorenc; P Pietschmann; K Vandormael; A Lombardi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-08-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew R Smith; Simone Peart Boyce; Erick Moyneur; Mei Sheng Duh; Monika K Raut; Jane Brandman Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Howard A Fink; Susan K Ewing; Kristine E Ensrud; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Brent C Taylor; Jane A Cauley; Eric S Orwoll Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Annie-Claude M Lassemillante; Suhail A R Doi; John D Hooper; John B Prins; Olivia R L Wright Journal: Endocrine Date: 2015-01-31 Impact factor: 3.633
Authors: Philip J Saylor; Ronald A Morton; Michael L Hancock; K Gary Barnette; Mitchell S Steiner; Matthew R Smith Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Susan L Greenspan; Julie Wagner; Joel B Nelson; Subashan Perera; Cynthia Britton; Neil M Resnick Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 2.617