BACKGROUND: Our previous studies demonstrated reduced rat glutathione S-transferase mu type 1 (Gstm1) expression in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSPs), when compared with the normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rat. METHODS: This study investigated the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) and a diuretic/vasodilator combination on the expression levels of rat Gstm1 and other Gstm isoforms. RESULTS: Antihypertensive treatments of young and mature SHRSPs with an ARB and a diuretic/vasodilator combination improved SBP but did not affect the expression levels of Gstm1. Although Gstm1 is a member of a family of highly homologous genes, with the exception of Gstm2, there was no evidence for compensatory increase in expression of other Gstm isoforms. In contrast, we observed reduced expression of several other Gstm isoforms in untreated SHRSPs. Untreated SHRSPs demonstrated increased renal and vascular oxidative stress, both of which were not significantly affected by the antihypertensive treatments. Untreated SHRSPs scored significantly higher when assessed for renal histopathological damage, and this was improved by antihypertensive treatments. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that reduced Gstm1 expression in SHRSPs is due to strain-dependent genetic abnormalities, playing a causative role in the development of hypertension, probably through oxidative stress pathway. Renal changes occur as a consequence of increased blood pressure and can be improved when treated with antihypertensive drugs. In silico comparative genome analysis combined with expression studies in rat and human vascular tissue revealed that there are possible four human homologues (GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM4 and GSTM5) for rat Gstm1.
BACKGROUND: Our previous studies demonstrated reduced ratglutathione S-transferase mu type 1 (Gstm1) expression in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensiverats (SHRSPs), when compared with the normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rat. METHODS: This study investigated the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) and a diuretic/vasodilator combination on the expression levels of ratGstm1 and other Gstm isoforms. RESULTS: Antihypertensive treatments of young and mature SHRSPs with an ARB and a diuretic/vasodilator combination improved SBP but did not affect the expression levels of Gstm1. Although Gstm1 is a member of a family of highly homologous genes, with the exception of Gstm2, there was no evidence for compensatory increase in expression of other Gstm isoforms. In contrast, we observed reduced expression of several other Gstm isoforms in untreated SHRSPs. Untreated SHRSPs demonstrated increased renal and vascular oxidative stress, both of which were not significantly affected by the antihypertensive treatments. Untreated SHRSPs scored significantly higher when assessed for renal histopathological damage, and this was improved by antihypertensive treatments. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that reduced Gstm1 expression in SHRSPs is due to strain-dependent genetic abnormalities, playing a causative role in the development of hypertension, probably through oxidative stress pathway. Renal changes occur as a consequence of increased blood pressure and can be improved when treated with antihypertensive drugs. In silico comparative genome analysis combined with expression studies in rat and human vascular tissue revealed that there are possible four human homologues (GSTM1, GSTM2, GSTM4 and GSTM5) for ratGstm1.
Authors: Laura Denby; Vasudev Ramdas; Martin W McBride; Joe Wang; Hollie Robinson; John McClure; Wendy Crawford; Ruifang Lu; Dianne Z Hillyard; Raya Khanin; Reuven Agami; Anna F Dominiczak; Claire C Sharpe; Andrew H Baker Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Lee Siew-Keah; Arunkumar Sundaram; K N S Sirajudeen; Rahimah Zakaria; H J Singh Journal: J Physiol Biochem Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 4.158
Authors: Emma L Bailey; Martin W McBride; Wendy Beattie; John D McClure; Delyth Graham; Anna F Dominiczak; Cathie L M Sudlow; Colin Smith; Joanna M Wardlaw Journal: Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 8.090