Literature DB >> 19531943

Rapid identification and differentiation of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial bloodstream infections by quantitative polymerase chain reaction in preterm infants.

Kathy Y Y Chan1, Hugh S Lam, Hon M Cheung, Allen K C Chan, Karen Li, Tai F Fok, Pak C Ng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of the Gram-specific probe-based quantitative polymerase chain reaction test for rapid detection and differentiation of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial bloodstream infection in preterm infants.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: University-affiliated Level III neonatal intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Preterm infants with clinical features suggestive of late-onset infection.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In addition to the full sepsis screen, 0.5 mL of EDTA blood was collected aseptically for Gram-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction evaluation. The results were analyzed with respect to outcomes of bacterial culture in blood and other body fluids, including peritoneal and cerebrospinal fluids. The diagnostic utilities of the quantitative polymerase chain reaction were determined. A total of 218 suspected infection episodes were investigated, of which 42 episodes were culture positive and 176 were culture negative. For Gram-negative infection, the quantitative polymerase chain reaction test correctly identified 19 of 22 episodes, and the sensitivity and specificity were 86.4% and 99.0%, respectively. For Gram-positive infection, the test correctly identified 14/19 episodes, and the sensitivity and specificity were 73.7% and 98.5%. The remaining one episode was Candida albicans septicemia. None of the episodes with positive quantitative polymerase chain reaction test were classified into the wrong Gram stain category. More importantly, despite negative blood culture in five infants suffering from intra-abdominal sepsis (peritonitis [n = 4] and hepatosplenic abscess [n = 1]), the quantitative polymerase chain reaction test could detect the Gram-specific category of causative organisms in blood.
CONCLUSIONS: The Gram-specific quantitative polymerase chain reaction test is reliable and highly specific for rapid identification and differentiation of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bloodstream and intra-abdominal infections. The result could be made available within 5 hrs after the specimen reaches the laboratory. A positive test is able to "rule in" bacterial bloodstream infection before blood culture results become available, and serves as a guide to predict the virulence of the causative organism according to its Gram-specific category so that critical patients can be targeted for intensive treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19531943     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a554de

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  17 in total

1.  Multiplex blood PCR in combination with blood cultures for improvement of microbiological documentation of infection in febrile neutropenia.

Authors:  F Lamoth; K Jaton; G Prod'hom; L Senn; J Bille; T Calandra; O Marchetti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of MolYsis™ Complete5 DNA extraction method for detecting Staphylococcus aureus DNA from whole blood in a sepsis model using PCR/pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Chase D McCann; Jeanne A Jordan
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 3.  Diagnostics for neonatal sepsis: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  Pui-Ying Iroh Tam; Catherine M Bendel
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.756

4.  On the Threshold of a Dream.

Authors:  Jerry J Zimmerman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  Molecular microbiological methods in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.

Authors:  Mohan Venkatesh; Angela Flores; Ruth Ann Luna; James Versalovic
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 6.  Molecular assays for the diagnosis of sepsis in neonates.

Authors:  Mohan Pammi; Angela Flores; James Versalovic; Mariska Mg Leeflang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-25

7.  Predominance of Enterobacteriaceae isolates in early positive anaerobic blood culture bottles in BacT/Alert system.

Authors:  Tzong-Shi Chiueh; Shih-Yi Lee; Sheng-Hui Tang; Jang-Jih Lu; Jun-Ren Sun
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 2.352

8.  Efficacy of bacterial ribosomal RNA-targeted reverse transcription-quantitative PCR for detecting neonatal sepsis: a case control study.

Authors:  Makoto Fujimori; Ken Hisata; Satoru Nagata; Nobuaki Matsunaga; Mitsutaka Komatsu; Hiromichi Shoji; Hiroaki Sato; Yuichiro Yamashiro; Takashi Asahara; Koji Nomoto; Toshiaki Shimizu
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2010-07-29       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Meropenem vs standard of care for treatment of late onset sepsis in children of less than 90 days of age: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Irja Lutsar; Ursula M T Trafojer; Paul T Heath; Tuuli Metsvaht; Joseph Standing; Susanna Esposito; Vincent Meiffredy de Cabre; Clarissa Oeser; Jean-Pierre Aboulker
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  How can the microbiologist help in diagnosing neonatal sepsis?

Authors:  Michela Paolucci; Maria Paola Landini; Vittorio Sambri
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2012-01-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.