INTRODUCTION: Bioimmunochemotherapy (BCT) is a combination of biological agents and cytostatics that has shown an increase in response rate (RR) in metastatic melanoma patients. The aim of the study is to evaluate RR, progression- free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 11 metastatic melanoma patients treated from January 2002 to June 2008 with cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1.4, dacarbazine 800 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1, vinblastine 1.5 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1.4, interleukin (IL)-2 9 MIU/m(2) s.c. 5.8 days and interferon (IFN)-alpha-2b 5 MIU/m2 s.c. days 5.9, 11, 13 and 15, with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and antibiotics. Patients with ECOG 0, age < or = 65 years and with measurable disease were included. The planned number of courses was 4. RR was measured by Revised Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumour (RECIST) criteria (computed tomography [CT]+/-proton emission tomography [PET]). Toxicity was measured according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria. RESULTS: Observed RRs were 18% complete response (CR), 27% partial response (PR), 9% stable disease (SD) and 46% disease progression. The median PFS was 4 months (95% CI, 0.10 m), with a 23% one-year PFS. Median OS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 0.9.19 m), with a 29% one-year OS. Eighty-three percent of patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity, mainly due to neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and flu-like syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with BCT shows an increase in RR, some achieving durable CR; nevertheless it cannot be considered a standard treatment and should be employed only in selected patients.
INTRODUCTION: Bioimmunochemotherapy (BCT) is a combination of biological agents and cytostatics that has shown an increase in response rate (RR) in metastatic melanomapatients. The aim of the study is to evaluate RR, progression- free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and treatment toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 11 metastatic melanomapatients treated from January 2002 to June 2008 with cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1.4, dacarbazine 800 mg/m(2) i.v. day 1, vinblastine 1.5 mg/m(2) i.v. days 1.4, interleukin (IL)-2 9 MIU/m(2) s.c. 5.8 days and interferon (IFN)-alpha-2b 5 MIU/m2 s.c. days 5.9, 11, 13 and 15, with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and antibiotics. Patients with ECOG 0, age < or = 65 years and with measurable disease were included. The planned number of courses was 4. RR was measured by Revised Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumour (RECIST) criteria (computed tomography [CT]+/-proton emission tomography [PET]). Toxicity was measured according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) common toxicity criteria. RESULTS: Observed RRs were 18% complete response (CR), 27% partial response (PR), 9% stable disease (SD) and 46% disease progression. The median PFS was 4 months (95% CI, 0.10 m), with a 23% one-year PFS. Median OS was 4.6 months (95% CI, 0.9.19 m), with a 29% one-year OS. Eighty-three percent of patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity, mainly due to neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and flu-like syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with BCT shows an increase in RR, some achieving durable CR; nevertheless it cannot be considered a standard treatment and should be employed only in selected patients.
Authors: D F McDermott; J W Mier; D P Lawrence; M R van den Brink; M A Clancy; K M Rubin; M B Atkins Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Ulrich Keilholz; Cornelis J A Punt; Martin Gore; Wim Kruit; Poulam Patel; Danielle Lienard; Jose Thomas; Thomas M Proebstle; Alexander Schmittel; Dirk Schadendorf; Thierry Velu; Sylvie Negrier; Ulrich Kleeberg; Frederic Lehman; Stefan Suciu; Alexander M M Eggermont Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: M B Atkins; M T Lotze; J P Dutcher; R I Fisher; G Weiss; K Margolin; J Abrams; M Sznol; D Parkinson; M Hawkins; C Paradise; L Kunkel; S A Rosenberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P B Chapman; L H Einhorn; M L Meyers; S Saxman; A N Destro; K S Panageas; C B Begg; S S Agarwala; L M Schuchter; M S Ernstoff; A N Houghton; J M Kirkwood Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S A Rosenberg; J C Yang; D J Schwartzentruber; P Hwu; F M Marincola; S L Topalian; C A Seipp; J H Einhorn; D E White; S M Steinberg Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Omar Eton; Sewa S Legha; Agop Y Bedikian; J Jack Lee; Antonio C Buzaid; Cynthia Hodges; Sigrid E Ring; Nicholas E Papadopoulos; Carl Plager; Mary Jo East; Feng Zhan; Robert S Benjamin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-04-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: E Bajetta; M Del Vecchio; P Nova; A Fusi; A Daponte; M R Sertoli; P Queirolo; P Taveggia; M G Bernengo; S S Legha; B Formisano; N Cascinelli Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2006-02-09 Impact factor: 32.976