Literature DB >> 19530982

Weekly versus monthly drug regimens: 1-year compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy.

Deborah T Gold1, Haian Trinh, Wael Safi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine compliance and persistence with weekly risedronate and monthly ibandronate therapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The IMS longitudinal prescription database was used to evaluate compliance (mean medication possession ratio), persistence (days until a gap >90 days between prescriptions occurred) and cumulative drug availability (ratio of drug supply and days between first fill date and the end of the study) among patients taking weekly risedronate or monthly ibandronate over a 12-month period using three retrospective cohorts: overall sample, new to osteoporosis therapy, and new to osteoporosis therapy after initial market availability. Comparisons were made between drug groups for each measure.
RESULTS: Compliance was significantly different for the overall sample (80.15 +/- 18.90% for risedronate vs. 74.68 +/- 22.56% for ibandronate; p < 0.0001), and marginally different during the initial post-marketing year (p = 0.091), but not for patients new to therapy (p = 0.693). Persistence was significantly different for the overall sample (250.04 +/- 132.34 days for risedronate vs. 151.54 +/- 137.24 days for ibandronate; p < 0.0001), for patients new to therapy (154.38 +/- 135.29 days for risedronate vs. 133.33 +/- 130.36 days for ibandronate; p < 0.0001), and after initial market availability (165.00 +/- 141.58 days for risedronate vs. 133.33 +/- 130.36 days for ibandronate; p < 0.0001). Mean cumulative drug availability was significantly different for the overall sample (64.54 +/- 29.86% for risedronate vs. 43.38 +/- 32.96% for ibandronate; p < 0.0001), for patients new to therapy (40.34 +/- 31.84% for risedronate vs. 36.05 +/- 31.09% for ibandronate; p < 0.0001), and after initial market availability (43.17 +/- 33.34% for risedronate vs. 36.05 +/- 31.09% for ibandronate; p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patient compliance, persistence and cumulative drug availability were similar for monthly ibandronate and weekly risedronate dosing. Interpretations from this study are limited by assumptions of persistence based on initial drug dosing and selected refill gap length measured. Furthermore, comparisons with earlier studies are difficult, due to differences in definitions of compliance and persistence. Further studies are needed to explore factors affecting patterns of medication use, particularly the effects of patient preference, acceptance, and patient education on compliance and persistence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19530982     DOI: 10.1185/03007990903035604

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  9 in total

Review 1.  Measuring and improving adherence to osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Suzanne M Cadarette; Andrea M Burden
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  The economics of improving medication adherence in osteoporosis: validation and application of a simulation model.

Authors:  Amanda R Patrick; John T Schousboe; Elena Losina; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 3.  A systematic review of factors affecting medication adherence among patients with osteoporosis.

Authors:  C T Yeam; S Chia; H C C Tan; Y H Kwan; W Fong; J J B Seng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Osteoporosis therapies: evidence from health-care databases and observational population studies.

Authors:  Stuart L Silverman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Compliance and persistence with daily, weekly, and monthly bisphosphonates for osteoporosis in Japan: analysis of data from the CISA.

Authors:  Hideaki Kishimoto; Masayuki Maehara
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Gender- and age-related treatment compliance in patients with osteoporosis in Germany.

Authors:  Peyman Hadji; Louis Jacob; Karel Kostev
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Real-world persistence and adherence with oral bisphosphonates for osteoporosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  F Fatoye; P Smith; T Gebrye; G Yeowell
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-04-14       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Persistence with denosumab and persistence with oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a retrospective, observational study, and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  L Karlsson; J Lundkvist; E Psachoulia; M Intorcia; O Ström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Persistence at 24 months with denosumab among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Stuart L Silverman; E Siris; D Belazi; C Recknor; A Papaioannou; J P Brown; D T Gold; E M Lewiecki; G Quinn; A Balasubramanian; S Yue; B Stolshek; D L Kendler
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.617

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.