Literature DB >> 19528305

Chronic atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of medical heart rate control management.

T Nikolaidou1, K S Channer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent guidelines by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology (ACC/AHA/ESC) on rate control management for chronic atrial fibrillation have relegated digoxin to second line treatment, recommending instead the use of beta-blockers or rate limiting calcium antagonists as first line treatment. The objective of this review is to assess the efficacy of these drugs in controlling heart rate, and in improving symptoms and exercise tolerance. DATA SOURCES: We electronically searched the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases, hand searched journals and relevant bibliographies for articles. SELECTION OF STUDIES: We included all study designs evaluating or comparing oral digoxin, beta-blockers and calcium antagonists, alone or in combination, for rate control in chronic atrial fibrillation. 46 studies satisfied our inclusion and quality criteria.
RESULTS: Published studies are small and too heterogeneous to be quantitatively combined. Descriptive synthesis of the data shows little evidence that monotherapy with beta-blockers or calcium antagonists improves symptoms or exercise capacity in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation. Instead it is associated with dose related side effects.
CONCLUSION: Based on the limited data available, we conclude that the combination of digoxin with either a beta-blocker or calcium antagonist should be first line management in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19528305     DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.068908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  6 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based practice method of integrative Chinese and Western medicine based on literature retrieval through PICO question and complementary and alternative medicine topics.

Authors:  Xiu-feng Yan; Qing Ni; Jun-ping Wei; Hao Xu
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 1.978

2.  Should Digoxin Continue To Be Used for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors: 
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-10-31

Review 3.  Twenty-five years in the making: flecainide is safe and effective for the management of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Etienne Aliot; Alessandro Capucci; Harry J Crijns; Andreas Goette; Juan Tamargo
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  A Prospective Survey of Atrial Fibrillation Management for Real-world Guideline Adherence: COmparison study of Drugs for symptom control and complication prEvention of Atrial Fibrillation (CODE-AF) Registry.

Authors:  Hyeongsoo Kim; Tae Hoon Kim; Myung Jin Cha; Jung Myung Lee; Junbeom Park; Jin Kyu Park; Ki Woon Kang; Jaemin Shim; Jae Sun Uhm; Jun Kim; Hyung Wook Park; Eue Keun Choi; Jin Bae Kim; Changsoo Kim; Young Soo Lee; Boyoung Joung
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial.

Authors:  Dipak Kotecha; Melanie Calvert; Jonathan J Deeks; Michael Griffith; Paulus Kirchhof; Gregory Yh Lip; Samir Mehta; Gemma Slinn; Mary Stanbury; Richard P Steeds; Jonathan N Townend
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Symptom Burden of Atrial Fibrillation and Its Relation to Interventions and Outcome in Europe.

Authors:  Renate B Schnabel; Ladislav Pecen; Nargiz Rzayeva; Markus Lucerna; Yanish Purmah; Francisco M Ojeda; Raffaele De Caterina; Paulus Kirchhof
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.