Literature DB >> 19528087

Inferring progression models for CGH data.

Jun Liu1, Nirmalya Bandyopadhyay, Sanjay Ranka, M Baudis, Tamer Kahveci.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: One of the mutational processes that has been monitored genome-wide is the occurrence of regional DNA copy number alterations (CNAs), which may lead to deletion or over-expression of tumor suppressors or oncogenes, respectively. Understanding the relationship between CNAs and different cancer types is a fundamental problem in cancer studies.
RESULTS: This article develops an efficient method that can accurately model the progression of the cancer markers and reconstruct evolutionary relationship between multiple types of cancers using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) data. Such modeling can lead to better understanding of the commonalities and differences between multiple cancer types and potential therapies. We have developed an automatic method to infer a graph model for the markers of multiple cancers from a large population of CGH data. Our method identifies highly related markers across different cancer types. It then builds a directed acyclic graph that shows the evolutionary history of these markers based on how common each marker is in different cancer types. We demonstrated the use of this model in determining the importance of markers in cancer evolution. We have also developed a new method to measure the evolutionary distance between different cancers based on their markers. This method employs the graph model we developed for the individual markers to measure the distance between pairs of cancers. We used this measure to create an evolutionary tree for multiple cancers. Our experiments on Progenetix database show that our markers are largely consistent to the reported hot-spot imbalances and most frequent imbalances. The results show that our distance measure can accurately reconstruct the evolutionary relationship between multiple cancer types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19528087     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  9 in total

1.  Tracing the tumor lineage.

Authors:  Nicholas E Navin; James Hicks
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Accurate reconstruction of the temporal order of mutations in neoplastic progression.

Authors:  Kathleen Sprouffske; John W Pepper; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 3.  The evolution of tumour phylogenetics: principles and practice.

Authors:  Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 4.  Testing clonality of three and more tumors using their loss of heterozygosity profiles.

Authors:  Irina Ostrovnaya
Journal:  Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2012-07-13

5.  Specific genomic regions are differentially affected by copy number alterations across distinct cancer types, in aggregated cytogenetic data.

Authors:  Nitin Kumar; Haoyang Cai; Christian von Mering; Michael Baudis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Inferring models of multiscale copy number evolution for single-tumor phylogenetics.

Authors:  Salim Akhter Chowdhury; E Michael Gertz; Darawalee Wangsa; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried; Alejandro A Schäffer; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  Methods and challenges in timing chromosomal abnormalities within cancer samples.

Authors:  Elizabeth Purdom; Christine Ho; Catherine S Grasso; Michael J Quist; Raymond J Cho; Paul Spellman
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Algorithms to model single gene, single chromosome, and whole genome copy number changes jointly in tumor phylogenetics.

Authors:  Salim Akhter Chowdhury; Stanley E Shackney; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Thomas Ried; Alejandro A Schäffer; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Comparing copy-number profiles under multi-copy amplifications and deletions.

Authors:  Garance Cordonnier; Manuel Lafond
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.