Literature DB >> 19527893

Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging.

Ammar Sarwar1, Michael D Shapiro, Khurram Nasir, Koen Nieman, Cesar H Nomura, Thomas J Brady, Ricardo C Cury.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have compared 64-slice multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for left ventricular (LV) function; however, none were performed in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction.
OBJECTIVES: We compared global and regional LV function assessment by 64-slice CT (MDCT) with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) after reperfused ST elevation myocardial infarction.
METHODS: Twenty-one patients were scanned after reperfusion with contrast-enhanced CMR and MDCT. Reconstructed short axis images were used to assess global (quantitative assessment of LF end-diastolic volume [LVEDV], end-systolic volume [LVESV], stroke volume [LVSV], ejection fraction [LVEF], and mass, by Simpson's method) and regional cardiac function (qualitative assessment on a 4-point scale [4=normal, 3=hypokinesia, 2=dyskinesia, 1=akinesia]) in a standard 17-segment myocardial model.
RESULTS: We scanned 21 persons (age, 60+/-10 years; 19 men) with CMR and MDCT. Good correlation was observed for all global parameters between MDCT and CMR (LVEF, r=0.90; LVEDV, r=0.91; LVESV, r=0.94; LVSV, r=0.84; LV mass, r=0.91). Interobserver agreement for regional function was excellent (weighted kappa, 0.81). The interobserver agreement for regional function on MDCT and CMR were comparable (weighted kappa of 0.86 and 0.88, respectively). MDCT had a better sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for akinetic segments on CMR than did hypokinetic segments (71%, 91%, 68%, and 93% versus 84%, 97%, 81%, and 98%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: MDCT provides an accurate and reproducible measurement of regional and global LV function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19527893     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2009.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  9 in total

1.  Dual-step prospective ECG-triggered 128-slice dual-source CT for evaluation of coronary arteries and cardiac function without heart rate control: a technical note.

Authors:  Gudrun Feuchtner; Robert Goetti; Andrè Plass; Stephan Baumueller; Paul Stolzmann; Hans Scheffel; Monika Wieser; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Leschka
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Comparison of Echocardiography, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance, and Computed Tomographic Imaging for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Myocardial Function: Part 1 (Global Assessment).

Authors:  Menhel Kinno; Prashant Nagpal; Stephen Horgan; Alfonso H Waller
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Incremental diagnostic value of regional left ventricular function over coronary assessment by cardiac computed tomography for the detection of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain: from the ROMICAT trial.

Authors:  Sujith K Seneviratne; Quynh A Truong; Fabian Bamberg; Ian S Rogers; Michael D Shapiro; Christopher L Schlett; Claudia U Chae; Ricardo Cury; Suhny Abbara; Thomas J Brady; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Regional myocardial strain measurements from 4DCT in patients with normal LV function.

Authors:  Elliot R McVeigh; Amir Pourmorteza; Michael Guttman; Veit Sandfort; Francisco Contijoch; Suhas Budhiraja; Zhennong Chen; David A Bluemke; Marcus Y Chen
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2018-05-09

5.  Left ventricular volume: an optimal parameter to detect systolic dysfunction on prospectively triggered 64-multidetector row computed tomography: another step towards reducing radiation exposure.

Authors:  Mohit Gupta; Yalcin Hacioglu; Jigar Kadakia; Naser Ahmadi; Yanlin Gao; Song S Mao; Matthew J Budoff
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes: it depends on the imaging method.

Authors:  Peter W Wood; Jonathan B Choy; Navin C Nanda; Harald Becher
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 1.724

7.  Treatable cardiac disease in hospitalised COPD exacerbations.

Authors:  Paul Leong; Martin I MacDonald; Paul T King; Christian R Osadnik; Brian S Ko; Shane A Landry; Kais Hamza; Ahilan Kugenasan; John M Troupis; Philip G Bardin
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-02-08

8.  Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction values obtained using invasive contrast left ventriculography, two-dimensional echocardiography, and gated single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Nadish Garg; Thomas Dresser; Kul Aggarwal; Vishal Gupta; Mayank K Mittal; Martin A Alpert
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2016-06-24

9.  Assessment of Global Longitudinal and Circumferential Strain Using Computed Tomography Feature Tracking: Intra-Individual Comparison with CMR Feature Tracking and Myocardial Tagging in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Emilija Miskinyte; Paulius Bucius; Jennifer Erley; Seyedeh Mahsa Zamani; Radu Tanacli; Christian Stehning; Christopher Schneeweis; Tomas Lapinskas; Burkert Pieske; Volkmar Falk; Rolf Gebker; Gianni Pedrizzetti; Natalia Solowjowa; Sebastian Kelle
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.