Literature DB >> 19527762

Using real data for a virtual crossmatch.

Andrea A Zachary1, Jeffrey T Sholander, Julie A Houp, Mary S Leffell.   

Abstract

Virtual crossmatches have been performed for more than 40 years under the guise of unacceptable antigens. Today, solid-phase assays provide the opportunity for more accurate identification and more precise measurement of the strength of donor-specific antibodies. The process of performing a virtual crossmatch begins with establishing a correlation between the antibody testing assay and the results of actual crossmatches. We provide here data indicating that the identity and strength of DSA defined with solid-phase phenotype panels correlates significantly with the outcome of both cytotoxic (CDC; r = 0.83) and flow cytometric (r = 0.85) crossmatches. Based on the threshold established from these correlations, we were able to correctly predict the results of CDC and flow cytometric crossmatches in 92.8 and 92.4% of cases, respectively. The correlations with single antigen panels were substantially lower (82.6-47.9%) and may be caused by a variety of factors, including variability in the amount and condition of different antigens and extremely high sensitivity, which may make the test less robust. We demonstrate that adding additional information to the solid-phase results can increase the frequency of correct crossmatch prediction. We also present data demonstrating an additional use of the virtual crossmatch in posttransplant monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19527762     DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Immunol        ISSN: 0198-8859            Impact factor:   2.850


  27 in total

Review 1.  Immunogenetics and immunology in transplantation.

Authors:  Andrea A Zachary; Dessislava Kopchaliiska; Annette M Jackson; Mary S Leffell
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.829

2.  Endothelial cell antibodies associated with novel targets and increased rejection.

Authors:  Annette M Jackson; Tara K Sigdel; Marianne Delville; Szu-Chuan Hsieh; Hong Dai; Serena Bagnasco; Robert A Montgomery; Minnie M Sarwal
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Characteristics of Circulating Donor Human Leukocyte Antigen-specific Immunoglobulin G Antibodies Predictive of Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection and Kidney Allograft Failure.

Authors:  Dinesh Kannabhiran; John Lee; Joseph E Schwartz; Rex Friedlander; Meredith Aull; Thangamani Muthukumar; Sean Campbell; David Epstein; Surya V Seshan; Sandip Kapur; Vijay K Sharma; Manikkam Suthanthiran; Darshana Dadhania
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Persistent strong anti-HLA antibody at high titer is complement binding and associated with increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplant recipients.

Authors:  Adriana Zeevi; John Lunz; Brian Feingold; Michael Shullo; Christian Bermudez; Jeffery Teuteberg; Steven Webber
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 10.247

5.  Effect of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin on anti-HLA antibodies in sensitized kidney transplant candidates.

Authors:  Vinay Nair; Deirdre Sawinski; Enver Akalin; Rex Friedlander; Zeynep Ebcioglu; Vinita Sehgal; Rajani Dinavahi; Rafael Khaim; Scott Ames; Susan Lerner; Barbara Murphy; Jonathan S Bromberg; Peter S Heeger; Bernd Schröppel
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.863

6.  Study rationale, design, and pretransplantation alloantibody status: A first report of Clinical Trials in Organ Transplantation in Children-04 (CTOTC-04) in pediatric heart transplantation.

Authors:  Warren A Zuckerman; Adriana Zeevi; Kristen L Mason; Brian Feingold; Carol Bentlejewski; Linda J Addonizio; Elizabeth D Blume; Charles E Canter; Anne I Dipchand; Daphne T Hsu; Robert E Shaddy; William T Mahle; Anthony J Demetris; David M Briscoe; Thalachallour Mohanakumar; Joseph M Ahearn; David N Iklé; Brian D Armstrong; Yvonne Morrison; Helena Diop; Jonah Odim; Steven A Webber
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 7.  Luminex and antibody detection in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Antonietta Picascia; Teresa Infante; Claudio Napoli
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.801

8.  Transfusion of leukoreduced blood products and risk of antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts.

Authors:  Jennifer P Bynum; Andrea Zachary; Paul M Ness; Xun Luo; Serena Bagnasco; Karen E King; Dorry L Segev; Babak J Orandi; Daniel S Warren; Alice Fuller; Ana Ciappi; Robert Montgomery; Aaron A R Tobian
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  Kidney paired donation in the presence of donor-specific antibodies.

Authors:  Jeremy M Blumberg; Hans A Gritsch; Elaine F Reed; J M Cecka; Gerald S Lipshutz; Gabriel M Danovitch; Suzanne McGuire; David W Gjertson; Jeffrey L Veale
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 10.612

10.  Partially mismatched transplantation and human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies.

Authors:  Douglas E Gladstone; Andrea A Zachary; Ephraim J Fuchs; Leo Luznik; Yvette L Kasamon; Karen E King; Robert A Brodsky; Richard J Jones; Mary S Leffell
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.