Literature DB >> 19527744

Object recognition during foveating eye movements.

Alexander C Schütz1, Doris I Braun, Karl R Gegenfurtner.   

Abstract

We studied how saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements affect the recognition of briefly presented letters appearing within the eye movement target. First we compared the recognition performance during steady-state pursuit and during fixation. Single letters were presented for seven different durations ranging from 10 to 400 ms and four contrast levels ranging from 5% to 40%. For both types of eye movements the recognition rates increased with duration and contrast, but they were on average 11% lower during pursuit. In daily life humans use a combination of saccadic and smooth pursuit eye movements to foveate a peripheral moving object. To investigate this more natural situation, we presented a peripheral target that was either stationary or moving horizontally, above or below the fixation spot. Participants were asked to saccade to the target and to keep it foveated. The letters were presented at different times relative to the first target directed saccade. As would be expected from retinal masking and motion blur during saccades, the discrimination performance increased with increasing post-saccadic delay. If the target moved and the saccade was followed by pursuit, letter recognition performance was on average 16% lower than if the target was stationary and the saccade was followed by fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19527744     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

Review 1.  Visual perception and saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Michael Ibbotson; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Enhanced brain responses to color during smooth-pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Counterproductive effect of saccadic suppression during attention shifts.

Authors:  Alexandre Zénon; Brian D Corneil; Andrea Alamia; Nabil Filali-Sadouk; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Corrective saccades influence velocity judgments and interception.

Authors:  Alexander Goettker; Eli Brenner; Karl R Gegenfurtner; Cristina de la Malla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Looking away from a moving target does not disrupt the way in which the movement toward the target is guided.

Authors:  Clara Cámara; Joan López-Moliner; Eli Brenner; Cristina de la Malla
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Motion-in-depth effects on interceptive timing errors in an immersive environment.

Authors:  Joan López-Moliner; Cristina de la Malla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Retinal error signals and fluctuations in eye velocity influence oculomotor behavior in subsequent trials.

Authors:  Alexander Goettker
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.