| Literature DB >> 19527501 |
Ayako Shiraishi1, Sayaka Miyabe, Takayoshi Nakano, Yukichi Umakoshi, Masako Ito, Masahiko Mihara.
Abstract
<span class="abstract_title">BACKGROUND: We conducted the present study to investigate the therapeutic effects of a combination treatment of <span class="Chemical">alfacalcidol (ALF) and risedronate (RIS) on the bone mechanical properties of bone and calcium (Ca) metabolism using an ovariectomized (OVX) rat model of osteoporosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19527501 PMCID: PMC2706792 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-66
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Figure 1The regions of pQCT BMD and BAp axis measures in the L4 specimens.
Figure 2Effect of alfacalcidol and risedronate, alone or in combination, on the bone resorption marker in OVX rats. Starting 12 weeks after OVX, drugs were administered orally to rats for 12 weeks. Urinary DPD excretion was measured as biochemical marker of bone resorption, as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Data for DPD are corrected for urinary CRE concentrations. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 7–8). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the OVX-control group. Note that the combination therapy with ALF and RIS suppressed urinary DPD excretion more effectively than each drug alone. DPD: deoxypyridinoline, CRE: creatinine.
The effects of ALF and RIS on biomechanical properties of bones and urinary DPD excretion
| Variable | a two-way ANOVA1) | ||
| interaction | ALF-L | RIS-L | ALF × RIS |
| Urinary DPD excretion | <0.0001 | 0.0035 | 0.2115 |
| L5 ultimate load (N) | 0.0001 | 0.3290 | 0.1776 |
| L5 stiffness (N/mm) | 0.0345 | 0.1031 | 0.5763 |
| L5 energy (mJ) | 0.9173 | 0.6353 | 0.3556 |
| Femur ultimate load (N) | 0.0979 | <0.0001 | 0.1821 |
| Femur stiffness (N/mm) | 0.5386 | 0.4792 | 0.6799 |
| Femur energy (mJ) | 0.1358 | 0.0009 | 0.6119 |
1) P values were obtained from a two-way ANOVA model.
Figure 3Effects on the bone mechanical properties of lumbar vertebra in OVX rats. Starting 12 weeks after OVX, drugs were administered orally to rats for 12 weeks. The ultimate load, the stiffness and the energy in the fifth vertebral body were determined, as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 7–8). **p < 0.01, **p < 0.01 compared with the OVX-control group. Note that the combination therapy with ALF and RIS increased the ultimate load more effectively than RIS alone (p < 0.01).
Figure 4Effects on the bone mechanical properties of femoral midshaft in OVX rats. Starting 12 weeks after OVX, drugs were administered orally to rats for 12 weeks. The ultimate load, the stiffness and the energy in the femoral midshaft was determined, as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 7–8). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 compared with the OVX-control group. Note that the combination therapy with ALF and RIS increased the ultimate load and the energy at femoral midshaft more than ALF alone (p < 0.001).
The effects of ALF and RIS microstructural indices, 3D-BMD and BAp c-axis orientation in lumbar vertebra
| Variable | a two-way ANOVA1) | ||
| interaction | ALF-L | RIS-L | ALF × RIS |
| L5 BV/TV | 0.0420 | 0.0173 | 0.3994 |
| L5 BS/BV | 0.0438 | 0.0487 | 0.6317 |
| L5 Tb.N | 0.0670 | 0.0355 | 0.2750 |
| L5 Tb.Th | 0.0352 | 0.0350 | 0.8419 |
| L5 Tb.Sp | 0.1208 | 0.0358 | 0.1493 |
| BAp c-axis orientation | 0.2266 | 0.0599 | 0.9375 |
| 3D-BMD | 0.0326 | 0.8417 | 0.0020 |
1) P values were obtained from a two-way ANOVA model.
Figure 5Effects on the BMD and the BAp orientation at the ventral cortical portion of lumbar spine. Starting 12 weeks after OVX, drugs were administered orally to rats for 12 weeks. The BMD (A) and the BAp c-axis orientation (B) in the cranio-craudal direction were measured at the ventral cortical portion of the 4th lumbar spine by pQCT and micro-XRD, respectively, as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Typical micro-XRD profiles of the OVX and Sham rats were described for clarifying the spectral quality (C). Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 7–8). *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 compared with the OVX-control group. Note that the combination therapy with ALF and RIS recovers the BAp c-axis orientation at the 4th lumbar spine (p < 0.05). Intensity ratio of (002)/(310) corresponds to the orientation degree of the BAp c-axis as a bone quality parameter based on a material property in the cranio-craudal direction. The ratio in randomly oriented apatite powders is approximately 2, and increase in the preferential alignment of the BAp c-axis in the cranio-craudal direction increases the intensity ratio.
Figure 6Effects on balance of BMD and BAp orientation at the ventral cortical portion of lumbar spine. Starting 12 weeks after OVX, drugs were administered orally to rats for 12 weeks. The BMD and the BAp orientation were measured at the ventral cortical portion of the 4th lumbar spine by pQCT and maicro-XRD, respectively, as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS. Each value represents the mean ± SE (n = 7–8). Note that the combination therapy with ALF and RIS promoted to approach to the normal state of the Sham group. Intensity ratio of (002)/(310) corresponds to the orientation degree of the BAp c-axis as a bone quality parameter based on a material property in the cranio-craudal direction.
Body weight and biochemical parameters
| Group | n | Body weight (g) | Serum Ca (mg/dL) | Serum P (mg/dL) | Urine Ca/CRE | Urine P/CRE |
| Sham | 7 | 388 ± 14* | 9.8 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.4 | 0.095 ± 0.038 | 1.66 ± 0.29 |
| OVX | 8 | 436 ± 13 | 10.4 ± 0.3 | 6.7 ± 0.8 | 0.144 ± 0.072 | 1.40 ± 0.13 |
| ALF-L | 8 | 469 ± 11 | 10.6 ± 0.1 | 6.7 ± 0.4 | 0.207 ± 0.031a)### | 1.73 ± 0.25# |
| ALF-H | 8 | 447 ± 13 | 10.1 ± 0.4 | 6.5 ± 0.2* | 0.427 ± 0.040b)** | 2.02 ± 0.21* |
| RIS-L | 8 | 468 ± 10 | 9.9 ± 0.3a) | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 0.027 ± 0.004b) | 1.26 ± 0.11 |
| RIS-H | 8 | 459 ± 11 | 10.2 ± 0.1b) | 5.4 ± 0.1a) | 0.027 ± 0.004b) | 1.31 ± 0.11 |
| ALF-L + RIS-L | 8 | 465 ± 15 | 10.7 ± 0.1 | 5.8 ± 0.1 | 0.132 ± 0.015## | 1.56 ± 0.14 |
Ca: calcium, P: inorganic phosphate, CRE: creatinine
Mean ± SE (n = 7–8)
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. OVX control group
a)p < 0.05, b)p < 0.001 vs. ALF-L+RIS-L group
#p < 0.01, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 vs. ALF-H group
Microarchitectural indices of lumbar vertebra
| Group | BV/TV (%) | BS/BV (%) | Tb.Sp (μm) | Tb.Th (μm) | Tb.N |
| Sham | 0.36 ± 0.02c) | 28.3 ± 0.9 | 0.124 ± 0.005c) | 0.071 ± 0.002 | 5.1 ± 0.1c) |
| OVX | 0.26 ± 0.02 | 31.6 ± 1.6 | 0.190 ± 0.010 | 0.064 ± 0.003 | 4.0 ± 0.1 |
| ALF-L | 0.27 ± 0.01**## | 29.3 ± 0.4*## | 0.183 ± 0.005**## | 0.068 ± 0.001*## | 4.0 ± 0.1**## |
| ALF-H | 0.32 ± 0.01b) | 26.7 ± 0.6a) | 0.158 ± 0.004a) | 0.088 ± 0.002b) | 4.3 ± 0.1a) |
| RIS-L | 0.27 ± 0.01* | 29.3 ± 0.6* | 0.181 ± 0.010 | 0.068 ± 0.001* | 4.0 ± 0.1* |
| RIS-H | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 28.4 ± 0.5 | 0.167 ± 0.005 | 0.071 ± 0.001 | 4.2 ± 0.1 |
| ALF-L+RIS-L | 0.31 ± 0.01a) | 27.9 ± 0.3a) | 0.157 ± 0.004a) | 0.072 ± 0.001a) | 4.4 ± 0.1a) |
BV/TV: bone volume, BS/BV: bone surface, Tb.Sp: trabecular separation, Tb.Th: trabecular thickness, Tb.N: trabecular number
Mean ± SE (n = 7–8)
a)p < 0.05, b)p < 0.01, c)p < 0.001 vs. OVX control group
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. ALF-L+RIS-L group
#p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01 vs. ALF-H group