BACKGROUND: Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is the commonest oesophageal malignancy in the West, but is staged using a system designed for squamous cell carcinoma. The aim was to develop and validate a staging system for oesophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (Siewert types I and II) undergoing oesophagectomy with curative intent were randomly assigned to generation (313 patients) and validation (131) data sets. Outcome in the generation data set was associated with histopathological features; a revised node (N) classification was derived using recursive partitioning and tested on the validation data set. RESULTS: A revised N classification based on number of involved lymph nodes (N0, none; N1, one to five; N2, six or more) was prognostically significant (P < 0.001). Patients with involved nodes on both sides of the diaphragm, regardless of number, had the same outcome as the N2 group. When applied to the validation data set, the revised classification (including nodal number and location) provided greater discrimination between node-positive patients than the existing system (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A revised N classification based on number and location of involved lymph nodes provides improved prognostic power and incorporates features that may be useful before surgery in clinical management decisions. Copyright 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
BACKGROUND:Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is the commonest oesophageal malignancy in the West, but is staged using a system designed for squamous cell carcinoma. The aim was to develop and validate a staging system for oesophageal and junctional adenocarcinoma. METHODS:Patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma (Siewert types I and II) undergoing oesophagectomy with curative intent were randomly assigned to generation (313 patients) and validation (131) data sets. Outcome in the generation data set was associated with histopathological features; a revised node (N) classification was derived using recursive partitioning and tested on the validation data set. RESULTS: A revised N classification based on number of involved lymph nodes (N0, none; N1, one to five; N2, six or more) was prognostically significant (P < 0.001). Patients with involved nodes on both sides of the diaphragm, regardless of number, had the same outcome as the N2 group. When applied to the validation data set, the revised classification (including nodal number and location) provided greater discrimination between node-positive patients than the existing system (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A revised N classification based on number and location of involved lymph nodes provides improved prognostic power and incorporates features that may be useful before surgery in clinical management decisions. Copyright 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
Authors: Brechtje A Grotenhuis; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Jan Werner Poley; John J Hermans; Katharina Biermann; Manon C W Spaander; Marco J Bruno; Hugo W Tilanus; J Jan B van Lanschot Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Yuri Cho; Dong Ho Lee; Hong Sang Oh; Ji Yeon Seo; Dong Hyeon Lee; Nayoung Kim; Sook Hyang Jeong; Jin Wook Kim; Jin Hyuk Hwang; Young Soo Park; Sang Hyub Lee; Cheol Min Shin; Hyun Jin Jo; Hyun Chae Jung; Yong Bum Yoon; In Sung Song Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2012-04-07 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: William H Allum; Luigi Bonavina; Stephen D Cassivi; Miguel A Cuesta; Zhao Ming Dong; Valter Nilton Felix; Edgar Figueredo; Piers A C Gatenby; Leonie Haverkamp; Maksat A Ibraev; Mark J Krasna; René Lambert; Rupert Langer; Michael P N Lewis; Katie S Nason; Kevin Parry; Shaun R Preston; Jelle P Ruurda; Lara W Schaheen; Roger P Tatum; Igor N Turkin; Sylvia van der Horst; Donald L van der Peet; Peter C van der Sluis; Richard van Hillegersberg; Justin C R Wormald; Peter C Wu; Barbara M Zonderhuis Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Hironori Shiozaki; Rebecca Slack; Kazuki Sudo; Elena Elimova; Roopma Wadhwa; Hsian-Chun Chen; Heath D Skinner; Ritsuko Komaki; Jeffrey H Lee; Brian Weston; Manoop S Bhutani; Mariela A Blum; Jane E Rogers; Dipen M Maru; Wayne L Hofstetter; Jaffer A Ajani Journal: Oncology Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 2.935
Authors: Fergus Noble; James Hopkins; Nathan Curtis; Jamie J Kelly; Ian S Bailey; James P Byrne; Adrian C Bateman; Andrew R Bateman; Timothy J Underwood Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2013-05-21 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Aaldert K Talsma; Chin-Ann J Ong; Xinxue Liu; Pieter van Hagen; Jan J B Van Lanschot; Huug W Tilanus; Richard H Hardwick; Nicholas R Carroll; Manon C W Spaander; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Bas P L Wijnhoven Journal: World J Surg Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Koen Talsma; Pieter van Hagen; Brechtje A Grotenhuis; Ewout W Steyerberg; Hugo W Tilanus; Jan J B van Lanschot; Bas P L Wijnhoven Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 5.344