BACKGROUND: Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) promotes proliferation, metastasis, and poor survival in cancers of the breast, lung, and liver. Advanced localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is extraordinarily treatment resistant and has high recurrence rates despite surgery. Limited data exist regarding the prognostic significance of activated (phosphorylated) ERK in RCC. The authors hypothesized that activated ERK (pERK) promotes disease progression and metastasis in localized RCC and may be of value as a biomarker to predict disease recurrence. METHODS: The expression profile of pERK was examined by immunocytochemistry using a tissue microarray constructed from 174 drug treatment-naive patients who had undergone radical nephrectomy for localized RCC. Levels of tumor-cell specific pERK were scored and correlated with clinicopathologic parameters of RCC and disease-free survival. RESULTS: Immunostaining for pERK was present in 36% of all RCCs, with a predominance found in the clear cell histologic subtype. High expression was associated with increased tumor size, increased TNM stage, and vascular invasion. Patients with pERK-positive tumors had a mean disease-free survival of 4.19 years, compared with 6.38 years for patients with pERK-negative tumors (P<.001). Cox regression models revealed pERK to be a significant independent predictor of disease-free survival, with a hazards score of 2.9 (P<.001), a value similar to tumor grade (hazards ratio, 3.01; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Expression of pERK is an independent prognostic factor in RCC that is associated with advanced and aggressive pathologic features of renal tumors and predicts the onset of metastasis in patients with localized disease. Copyright (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND:Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) promotes proliferation, metastasis, and poor survival in cancers of the breast, lung, and liver. Advanced localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is extraordinarily treatment resistant and has high recurrence rates despite surgery. Limited data exist regarding the prognostic significance of activated (phosphorylated) ERK in RCC. The authors hypothesized that activated ERK (pERK) promotes disease progression and metastasis in localized RCC and may be of value as a biomarker to predict disease recurrence. METHODS: The expression profile of pERK was examined by immunocytochemistry using a tissue microarray constructed from 174 drug treatment-naive patients who had undergone radical nephrectomy for localized RCC. Levels of tumor-cell specific pERK were scored and correlated with clinicopathologic parameters of RCC and disease-free survival. RESULTS: Immunostaining for pERK was present in 36% of all RCCs, with a predominance found in the clear cell histologic subtype. High expression was associated with increased tumor size, increased TNM stage, and vascular invasion. Patients with pERK-positive tumors had a mean disease-free survival of 4.19 years, compared with 6.38 years for patients with pERK-negative tumors (P<.001). Cox regression models revealed pERK to be a significant independent predictor of disease-free survival, with a hazards score of 2.9 (P<.001), a value similar to tumor grade (hazards ratio, 3.01; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Expression of pERK is an independent prognostic factor in RCC that is associated with advanced and aggressive pathologic features of renal tumors and predicts the onset of metastasis in patients with localized disease. Copyright (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Authors: Francisco A Aguilar-Alonso; José D Solano; Chabetty Y Vargas-Olvera; Ignacio Pacheco-Bernal; Telma O Pariente-Pérez; María Elena Ibarra-Rubio Journal: Mol Cell Biochem Date: 2015-02-28 Impact factor: 3.396
Authors: Craig A Erickson; Balmiki Ray; Logan K Wink; Baindu L Bayon; Ernest V Pedapati; Rebecca Shaffer; Tori L Schaefer; Debomoy K Lahiri Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Christian R Hoerner; Rustin Massoudi; Thomas J Metzner; Laurel Stell; Jennifer J O'Rourke; Christina S Kong; Joanna E Liliental; James D Brooks; Chiara Sabatti; John T Leppert; Alice C Fan Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Date: 2018-11-20
Authors: Hua Wei; Hung-Lung Ke; Jie Lin; Sanjay Shete; Christopher G Wood; Michelle A T Hildebrandt Journal: Mol Carcinog Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 4.784
Authors: Guoqiang Li; Weimin Ci; Subhradip Karmakar; Ke Chen; Ruby Dhar; Zhixiang Fan; Zhongqiang Guo; Jing Zhang; Yuwen Ke; Lu Wang; Min Zhuang; Shengdi Hu; Xuesong Li; Liqun Zhou; Xianghong Li; Matthew F Calabrese; Edmond R Watson; Sandip M Prasad; Carrie Rinker-Schaeffer; Scott E Eggener; Thomas Stricker; Yong Tian; Brenda A Schulman; Jiang Liu; Kevin P White Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2014-03-20 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: A Horiguchi; T Asano; K Kuroda; A Sato; J Asakuma; K Ito; M Hayakawa; M Sumitomo; T Asano Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Lee Campbell; Ghaith Al-Jayyoussi; Robert Gutteridge; Nigel Gumbleton; Rosie Griffiths; Simon Gumbleton; Mathew W Smith; David F R Griffiths; Mark Gumbleton Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2013-10-11 Impact factor: 5.531