| Literature DB >> 19526226 |
Jean-Paul Payan1, Michel Lafontaine, Patrice Simon, Fabrice Marquet, Catherine Champmartin-Gendre, Dominique Beydon, Ludivine Wathier, Elisabeth Ferrari.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the percutaneous absorption flux of BaP (20 microg/cm(2) in ethanol) and the usefulness of urinary 3-OHBaP as a bio-indicator of dermal exposure to BaP. The percutaneous absorbed dose and absorption flux were estimated by comparison with intravenous administration of BaP (0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg in Cremophor) as reference way. A percutaneous absorption flux of 0.37 microg/cm(2)/h was determined by killing groups of rats, following exposure time of 4.5 and 24 h. [(14)C] skin content was 3.1 microg/cm(2), after 24 h exposure to BaP. Total urinary 3-OHBaP accounted for 0.4% of the real absorbed dose, which was fourfold higher than the percentage of an intravenous dose excreted as 3-OHBaP. This finding reveals that percutaneous absorption of BaP, based on the ratio of urinary excretion of 3-OHBaP following percutaneous exposure compared to percutaneous absorption following intravenous administration of BaP, is overestimated in the rat. In vitro, BaP was intensively metabolised by rat skin. Unchanged BaP and 3-OHBaP in receptor fluid accounted for 50 and 30% of the total radioactivity. This percutaneous first past effect of BaP in rats could, in part, explain the higher urinary excretion ratio of 3-OHBaP compared to the value based on intravenous administration of BaP. Conversely, BaP was largely lower metabolised as 3-OHBaP during percutaneous absorption by humans, so BaP absorption flux should be overestimated to a lesser extent in humans than in rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19526226 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-009-0440-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Toxicol ISSN: 0340-5761 Impact factor: 5.153