Literature DB >> 19525726

HRT III glaucoma probability score and Moorfields regression across the glaucoma spectrum.

Swathi Reddy1, Danli Xing, Stella N Arthur, Noga Harizman, Syril Dorairaj, Robert Ritch, Jeffrey M Liebmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III Glaucoma Probability Score (GPS) and Moorfields Regression Analysis (MRA) across the spectrum of glaucomatous visual field (VF) loss.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study.
METHODS: Data from 247 glaucoma patients and 142 controls who underwent standard achromatic perimetry (SITA-SAP) and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph III imaging within 6 months were analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity, agreement, and discrimination capability of MRA and GPS were assessed.
RESULTS: Age-adjusted specificity was 92% and 93% and sensitivity was 76.88 and 80.85 for GPS and MRA, respectively. Sensitivity for early VF loss [mean deviation (MD) < -5 dB] (N=81) was 66.64% and 69.82%, for moderate VF loss (-5 dB <MD < -15 dB) (N=104) was 78.91% and 85.13%, and for advanced VF loss (MD> -15 dB) (N=62) was 87.70% and 86.48% (GPS and MRA, respectively). Age-specific receiver operating characteristics ranged from 0.89 to 0.92 and from 0.87 to 0.90 (GPS and MRA, respectively). Kappa ranged from 0.64 to 0.77.
CONCLUSIONS: Specificity for MRA and GPS was similar and agreement was good. GPS offered slightly higher age-specific receiver operating characteristic. GPS, which does not require contour line placement, may have a potential role in screening for severe glaucomatous damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19525726     DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31818c6edd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Glaucoma        ISSN: 1057-0829            Impact factor:   2.503


  8 in total

1.  Influence of clinically invisible, but optical coherence tomography detected, optic disc margin anatomy on neuroretinal rim evaluation.

Authors:  Alexandre S C Reis; Neil O'Leary; Hongli Yang; Glen P Sharpe; Marcelo T Nicolela; Claude F Burgoyne; Balwantray C Chauhan
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Linking structure and function in glaucoma.

Authors:  R S Harwerth; J L Wheat; M J Fredette; D R Anderson
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 3.  Clinical application of ocular imaging.

Authors:  Zach Nadler; Gadi Wollstein; Hiroshi Ishikawa; Joel S Schuman
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Comparison of the diagnostic ability of Moorfield's regression analysis and glaucoma probability score using Heidelberg retinal tomograph III in eyes with primary open angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Shveta Jindal; Tanuj Dada; V Sreenivas; Viney Gupta; Ramanjit Sihota; Anita Panda
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 5.  Confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in glaucoma diagnosis and management.

Authors:  C Alexandrescu; A M Dascalu; A Panca; A Sescioreanu; C Mitulescu; R Ciuluvica; L Voinea; C Celea
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep

6.  Optic disc classification by the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and by physicians with varying experience of glaucoma.

Authors:  S Andersson; A Heijl; B Bengtsson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  HRT for the Diagnosis and Detection of Glaucoma Progression.

Authors:  Jessica S Maslin; Kaweh Mansouri; Syril K Dorairaj
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2015-05-15

8.  Comparison of Ethnic-specific Databases in Heidelberg Retina Tomography-3 to Discriminate Between Early Glaucoma and Normal Chinese Eyes.

Authors:  Xiu Ling Tan; Sae Cheong Yap; Xiang Li; Leonard W Yip
Journal:  Open Ophthalmol J       Date:  2017-02-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.