Literature DB >> 19525541

Gaze behavior in face comparison: the roles of sex, task, and symmetry.

Regine Armann1, Isabelle Bülthoff.   

Abstract

Knowing where people look on a face provides an objective insight into the information entering the visual system and into cognitive processes involved in face perception. In the present study, we recorded eye movements of human participants while they compared two faces presented simultaneously. Observers' viewing behavior and performance was examined in two tasks of parametrically varying difficulty, using two types of face stimuli (sex morphs and identity morphs). The frequency, duration, and temporal sequence of fixations on previously defined areas of interest in the faces were analyzed. As was expected, viewing behavior and performance varied with difficulty. Interestingly, observers compared predominantly the inner halves of the face stimuli-a result inconsistent with the general left-hemiface bias reported for single faces. Furthermore, fixation patterns and performance differed between tasks, independently of stimulus type. Moreover, we found differences in male and female participants' viewing behaviors, but only when the sex of the face stimuli was task relevant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19525541     DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.5.1107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  10 in total

1.  Faces in the eye of the beholder: unique and stable eye scanning patterns of individual observers.

Authors:  Eyal Mehoudar; Joseph Arizpe; Chris I Baker; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  The µ-opioid system promotes visual attention to faces and eyes.

Authors:  Olga Chelnokova; Bruno Laeng; Guro Løseth; Marie Eikemo; Frode Willoch; Siri Leknes
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Eye gaze during observation of static faces in deaf people.

Authors:  Katsumi Watanabe; Tetsuya Matsuda; Tomoyuki Nishioka; Miki Namatame
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Fixation patterns during recognition of personally familiar and unfamiliar faces.

Authors:  Goedele van Belle; Meike Ramon; Philippe Lefèvre; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-06-17

5.  Start position strongly influences fixation patterns during face processing: difficulties with eye movements as a measure of information use.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Dwight J Kravitz; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Perceptual and gaze biases during face processing: related or not?

Authors:  Hélène Samson; Nicole Fiori-Duharcourt; Karine Doré-Mazars; Christelle Lemoine; Dorine Vergilino-Perez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Eye movements while judging faces for trustworthiness and dominance.

Authors:  Frouke Hermens; Marius Golubickis; C Neil Macrae
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Using principal component analysis to characterize eye movement fixation patterns during face viewing.

Authors:  Kira Wegner-Clemens; Johannes Rennig; John F Magnotti; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Intuitive Face Judgments Rely on Holistic Eye Movement Pattern.

Authors:  Laura F Mega; Kirsten G Volz
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-20

10.  Gender Classification Based on Eye Movements: A Processing Effect During Passive Face Viewing.

Authors:  Negar Sammaknejad; Hamidreza Pouretemad; Changiz Eslahchi; Alireza Salahirad; Ashkan Alinejad
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2017-09-30
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.