Literature DB >> 19524972

Prediction of survival after radical cystectomy for invasive bladder carcinoma: risk group stratification, nomograms or artificial neural networks?

Mohsen el-Mekresh1, Ahmed Akl, Ahmed Mosbah, Mohamed Abdel-Latif, Hassan Abol-Enein, Mohamed A Ghoneim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We compared 3 predictive models for survival after radical cystectomy, risk group stratification, nomogram and artificial neural networks, in terms of their accuracy, performance and level of complexity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1996 and 2002, 1,133 patients were treated with single stage radical cystectomy as monotherapy for invasive bladder cancer. A randomly selected 776 cases (70%) were used as a reference series. The remaining 357 cases (test series) were used for external validation. Survival estimates were analyzed using univariate and then multivariate appraisal. The results of multivariate analysis were used for risk group stratification and construction of a nomogram, whereas all studied variables were entered directly into the artificial neural networks.
RESULTS: Overall 5-year disease-free survival was 64.5% with no statistical difference between the reference and test series. Comparisons of the 3 predictive models revealed that artificial neural networks outperformed the other 2 models in terms of the value of the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study artificial neural networks outperformed the risk group stratification model and nomogram construction in predicting patient 5-year survival probability, and in terms of sensitivity and specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19524972     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the tools available for predicting survival and managing patients with urothelial carcinomas of the bladder and of the upper tract in a curative setting.

Authors:  Sarah J Drouin; David R Yates; Vincent Hupertan; Olivier Cussenot; Morgan Rouprêt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  External validation of existing nomograms predicting lymph node metastases in cystectomized patients.

Authors:  Miroslav M Stojadinovic; Rade I Prelevic
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Bladder preservation versus radical cystectomy in transitional cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Dalia O Mohamed; Mona M Sayed; Islam F Abdelkawi; Mahmoud H Elshoieby; Salah M Khallaf; Lamia M Khallaf; Doaa M Fouad
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2021-03-29

4.  A systematic review of the applications of Expert Systems (ES) and machine learning (ML) in clinical urology.

Authors:  Hesham Salem; Daniele Soria; Jonathan N Lund; Amir Awwad
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.796

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.