Literature DB >> 19524743

Cannot exclude torsion--a 15-year review.

Sarah C Oltmann1, Anne Fischer, Robert Barber, Rong Huang, Barry Hicks, Nilda Garcia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ovarian torsion remains a challenging diagnosis, often leading to delayed operative intervention and resultant ovarian loss.
METHODS: Charts of patients with ovarian operative cases were retrospectively reviewed at a free-standing children's hospital over 15 years. Torsion was based on intraoperative findings.
RESULTS: Of 328 operative ovarian cases, 97 (29.6%) demonstrated torsion. Mean patient age was 9.2 years (2 days to 17 years, +/-0.54 SEM), with 52% occurring between 9 and 14 years. Of the patients, 97% presented in pain. Presence of a pelvic mass 5 cm or larger on imaging had 83% sensitivity for torsion: an ultrasound reading was only 51% sensitive. Elevated white blood cell count was the only preoperative characteristic associated with prompt operative intervention. Utilization of laparoscopy increased during the latter half of the study (18%-42%, P < .0434). There was a positive trend, although insignificant, in the use of laparoscopy and ovarian salvage. Pathology was overwhelmingly benign (infarction [46%], cysts [33%], and benign neoplasms [19%]).
CONCLUSION: Torsion was responsible for one third of all operative ovarian cases. Sonography is not reliable in diagnosis or exclusion of ovarian torsion. Thus, a strategy of earlier and liberal use of Diagnostic Laparoscopy (DL), particularly with a pelvic mass of approximately 5 cm, may improve ovarian salvage. Because pathology is predominantly benign, the edematous detorsed ovary is safe to salvage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19524743     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.02.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  38 in total

1.  Risk Factors for Strangulated Ovarian Hernia in Female Infants: the Role of Ovarian Volume.

Authors:  Yu Chen; Xiang-Zhi Peng; Wei Lu; Kai Zheng; Jian Guo; Hua Nie; Xiao-Jie Song; Yan Zhang; Jing Yang
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2018-12-07

2.  Five year retrospective case series of adnexal torsion.

Authors:  Sobha Nair; Smitha Joy; Jayashree Nayar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-12-05

Review 3.  Pediatric ovarian torsion: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Anh-Vu Ngo; Jeffrey P Otjen; Marguerite T Parisi; Mark R Ferguson; Randolph K Otto; A Luana Stanescu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-07-26

Review 4.  Emergent ultrasound evaluation of the pediatric female pelvis.

Authors:  Susan J Back; Carolina L Maya; Daniel Zewdneh; Monica Epelman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-04

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of pediatric adnexal masses and mimics.

Authors:  Christopher Z Lam; Govind B Chavhan
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of acquired disorders of the pediatric female pelvis other than neoplasm.

Authors:  Mougnyan Cox; Sharon W Gould; Daniel J Podberesky; Monica Epelman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-05-26

7.  Acute ovarian torsion in an infant: diagnostic clues on supine and decubitus abdominal radiographs confirmed by ultrasound.

Authors:  Lucas Marino DeJohn; Arabinda K Choudhary; Danielle K Boal
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-12-09

8.  Polycystic ovary syndrome with asynchronous bilateral adnexal torsion in a natural cycle.

Authors:  Shozo Matsuoka; Toru Kobayashi; Soshi Kusunoki; Daiki Ogishima
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2017-08-23

9.  Can contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) be useful in the diagnosis of ovarian torsion in pediatric females? A preliminary monocentric experience.

Authors:  Margherita Trinci; Ginevra Danti; Marco Di Maurizio; Stefano Tursini; Vito Briganti; Michele Galluzzo; Vittorio Miele
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-06-26

10.  Pediatric ovarian torsion: case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Naveen Poonai; Caroline Poonai; Rodrick Lim; Tim Lynch
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.