Literature DB >> 19524621

Magnetic purification of biotinylated cDNA removes false priming and ensures strand-specificity of RT-PCR for enteroviral RNAs.

Humberto F Boncristiani1, Reginaldo D Rossi, Miriã Ferreira Criado, Felipe Magalhães Furtado, Eurico Arruda.   

Abstract

The detection of replicative intermediate RNAs as markers of active replication of RNA viruses is an essential tool to investigate pathogenesis in acute viral infections, as well as in their long-term sequelae. In this regard, strand-specific PCR has been used widely to distinguish (-) and (+) enteroviral RNAs in pathogenesis studies of diseases such as dilated cardiomyopathy. It has been generally assumed that oligonucleotide-primed reverse transcription of a given RNA generates only the corresponding specific cDNA, thus assuring the specificity of a PCR product amplified from it. Nevertheless, such assumed strand-specificity is a fallacy, because falsely primed cDNAs can be produced by RNA reverse transcription in the absence of exogenously added primers, (cDNA(primer)(-)), and such falsely primed cDNAs are amplifiable by PCR in the same way as the correctly primed cDNAs. Using as a prototype the coxsackievirus B5 (CVB5), a (+) strand RNA virus, it was shown that cDNA(primer)(-) renders the differential detection of viral (-) and (+) RNAs by conventional PCR virtually impossible, due to gross non-specificity. Using in vitro transcribed CVB5 RNAs (+) and (-), it was shown that cDNA(primer)(-) could be removed effectively by magnetic physical separation of correctly primed biotinylated cDNA. Such strategy enabled truly strand-specific detection of RNA (-) and (+), not only for CVB5, but also for other non-polio enteroviruses. These findings indicate that previous conclusions supporting a role for the persistence of actively replicating enterovirus in the pathogenesis of chronic myocarditis should be regarded with strong skepticism and purification of correctly primed cDNA should be used for strand-specific PCR of viral RNA in order to obtain reliable information on this important subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19524621     DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  5 in total

1.  BeeDoctor, a versatile MLPA-based diagnostic tool for screening bee viruses.

Authors:  Lina De Smet; Jorgen Ravoet; Joachim R de Miranda; Tom Wenseleers; Matthias Y Mueller; Robin F A Moritz; Dirk C de Graaf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Strand-Specific Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay for Measurement of Arenavirus Genomic and Antigenomic RNAs.

Authors:  Kelsey Haist; Christopher Ziegler; Jason Botten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Efficacy of IFN-λ1 to protect human airway epithelial cells against human rhinovirus 1B infection.

Authors:  Fahad Gulraiz; Carla Bellinghausen; Mieke A Dentener; Niki L Reynaert; Giel R Gaajetaan; Erik V Beuken; Gernot G Rohde; Cathrien A Bruggeman; Frank R Stassen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Molecular approaches to the analysis of deformed wing virus replication and pathogenesis in the honey bee, Apis mellifera.

Authors:  Humberto F Boncristiani; Gennaro Di Prisco; Jeffery S Pettis; Michele Hamilton; Yan Ping Chen
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 4.099

5.  Concurrent detection of other respiratory viruses in children shedding viable human respiratory syncytial virus.

Authors:  T B Gagliardi; F E Paula; M A Iwamoto; J L Proença-Modena; A E Santos; A A Camara; M C Cervi; O A L Cintra; E Arruda
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.