BACKGROUND: Community-based health promotion is a widely advocated strategy in public health to favorably alter lifestyle. The aim of this study was to investigate the net effect of a cardiovascular disease-prevention program (Hartslag Limburg) on lifestyle factors after 5 years of intervention (1998-2003). METHODS: In a cohort study, 5-year mean changes in lifestyle factors (energy intake; fat intake; time spent on leisure-time physical activity; walking, bicycling, and sports; and smoking behavior) between subjects from the intervention area (n=2356) and the control area (n=758) were compared for men and women and for those with a low (less than intermediate secondary education) and a moderate (intermediate vocational or higher secondary education) or high (higher vocational education or university) educational level. Adjustments were made for age and the mean of the individual pre- and post-intervention measurement of the variable under study. When stratifying for gender, adjustments were made for educational level, and vice versa. RESULTS: In general, lifestyle factors changed unfavorably in the control group, whereas changes were less pronounced or absent in the intervention group. The adjusted difference in mean change in lifestyle factors between the intervention group and the control group was significant (p<or=0.05) for energy intake (-0.2 megajoule per day among both women and those with a low educational level); fat intake (-2.5 grams per day [g/d] among women and -3 g/d among those with a low educational level); time spent walking (+2.2 hours per week [hrs/wk] among women and +2.3 hrs/wk among those with a low educational level); time spent on total leisure-time physical activity (+2.1 hrs/wk among women); and time spent bicycling (+0.6 hrs/wk among those with a low educational level). CONCLUSIONS: The community intervention Hartslag Limburg succeeded in preventing age- and time-related unfavorable changes in energy intake, fat consumption, walking, and bicycling, particularly among women and those with low SES.
BACKGROUND: Community-based health promotion is a widely advocated strategy in public health to favorably alter lifestyle. The aim of this study was to investigate the net effect of a cardiovascular disease-prevention program (Hartslag Limburg) on lifestyle factors after 5 years of intervention (1998-2003). METHODS: In a cohort study, 5-year mean changes in lifestyle factors (energy intake; fat intake; time spent on leisure-time physical activity; walking, bicycling, and sports; and smoking behavior) between subjects from the intervention area (n=2356) and the control area (n=758) were compared for men and women and for those with a low (less than intermediate secondary education) and a moderate (intermediate vocational or higher secondary education) or high (higher vocational education or university) educational level. Adjustments were made for age and the mean of the individual pre- and post-intervention measurement of the variable under study. When stratifying for gender, adjustments were made for educational level, and vice versa. RESULTS: In general, lifestyle factors changed unfavorably in the control group, whereas changes were less pronounced or absent in the intervention group. The adjusted difference in mean change in lifestyle factors between the intervention group and the control group was significant (p<or=0.05) for energy intake (-0.2 megajoule per day among both women and those with a low educational level); fat intake (-2.5 grams per day [g/d] among womenand -3 g/d among those with a low educational level); time spent walking (+2.2 hours per week [hrs/wk] among women and +2.3 hrs/wk among those with a low educational level); time spent on total leisure-time physical activity (+2.1 hrs/wk among women); and time spent bicycling (+0.6 hrs/wk among those with a low educational level). CONCLUSIONS: The community intervention Hartslag Limburg succeeded in preventing age- and time-related unfavorable changes in energy intake, fat consumption, walking, and bicycling, particularly among women and those with low SES.
Authors: Benita Walton-Moss; Laura Samuel; Tam H Nguyen; Yvonne Commodore-Mensah; Matthew J Hayat; Sarah L Szanton Journal: J Cardiovasc Nurs Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.083
Authors: Saskia Pj Verkleij; Marcel C Adriaanse; Wm Monique Verschuren; Eric C Ruland; Gerrie C W Wendel-Vos; Albertine J Schuit Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2011-02-27 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Rory McGill; Elspeth Anwar; Lois Orton; Helen Bromley; Ffion Lloyd-Williams; Martin O'Flaherty; David Taylor-Robinson; Maria Guzman-Castillo; Duncan Gillespie; Patricia Moreira; Kirk Allen; Lirije Hyseni; Nicola Calder; Mark Petticrew; Martin White; Margaret Whitehead; Simon Capewell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2015-05-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Miranda Wijdenes; Lidewij Henneman; Nadeem Qureshi; Piet J Kostense; Martina C Cornel; Danielle R M Timmermans Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2013-05-17 Impact factor: 3.295