Literature DB >> 19523480

Estrogen signaling is not required for prostatic bud patterning or for its disruption by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Sarah Hicks Allgeier1, Chad M Vezina, Tien-Min Lin, Robert W Moore, Allen E Silverstone, Motoko Mukai, Jerrie Gavalchin, Paul S Cooke, Richard E Peterson.   

Abstract

Estrogens play an important role in prostatic development, health, and disease. While estrogen signaling is essential for normal postnatal prostate development, little is known about its prenatal role in control animals. We tested the hypothesis that estrogen signaling is needed for normal male prostatic bud patterning. Budding patterns were examined by scanning electron microscopy of urogenital sinus epithelium from wild-type mice, mice lacking estrogen receptor (ER)alpha, ERbeta, or both, and wild-type mice exposed to the antiestrogen ICI 182,780. Budding phenotypes did not detectably differ among any of these groups, strongly suggesting that estrogen signaling is not needed to establish the prototypical prostatic budding pattern seen in control males. This finding contributes to our understanding of the effects of low-level estrogen exposure on early prostate development. In utero exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) can greatly alter the pattern in which prostatic buds form and reduce their number. For several reasons, including a prior observation that inhibitory effects of TCDD on prostatic budding in rats depend heavily on the sex of adjacent fetuses, we tested the hypothesis that estrogen signaling is needed for TCDD to disrupt prostatic budding. However, budding did not detectably differ among wild-type mice, or mice lacking ERalpha, ERbeta, or both, that were exposed prenatally to TCDD (5 microg/kg on embryonic day 13.5). Nor did ICI 182,780 detectably affect the response to TCDD. These results strongly suggest that estrogen signaling is not needed for TCDD to inhibit prostatic epithelial budding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19523480      PMCID: PMC2766843          DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2009.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol        ISSN: 0041-008X            Impact factor:   4.219


  51 in total

1.  Elevated androgens and prolactin in aromatase-deficient mice cause enlargement, but not malignancy, of the prostate gland.

Authors:  S J McPherson; H Wang; M E Jones; J Pedersen; T P Iismaa; N Wreford; E R Simpson; G P Risbridger
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 2.  The role of estrogens in normal and abnormal development of the prostate gland.

Authors:  Gail S Prins; Liwei Huang; Lynn Birch; Yongbing Pu
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Physiological role of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in mouse ovary development.

Authors:  J C Benedict; T M Lin; I K Loeffler; R E Peterson; J A Flaws
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Ah receptor agonists as endocrine disruptors: antiestrogenic activity and mechanisms.

Authors:  S Safe; F Wang; W Porter; R Duan; A McDougal
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  1998-12-28       Impact factor: 4.372

5.  Estrogen receptor-alpha signaling in growth of the ventral prostate: comparison of neonatal growth and postcastration regrowth.

Authors:  Yoko Omoto
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 4.736

6.  Anti-androgenic action by red clover-derived dietary isoflavones reduces non-malignant prostate enlargement in aromatase knockout (ArKo) mice.

Authors:  Renea A Jarred; Stephen J McPherson; Margaret E E Jones; Evan R Simpson; Gail P Risbridger
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 7.  AhR acts as an E3 ubiquitin ligase to modulate steroid receptor functions.

Authors:  Fumiaki Ohtake; Yoshiaki Fujii-Kuriyama; Shigeaki Kato
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 5.858

8.  Effects of aryl hydrocarbon receptor null mutation and in utero and lactational 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin exposure on prostate and seminal vesicle development in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Tien-Min Lin; Kinarm Ko; Robert W Moore; Ulla Simanainen; Terry D Oberley; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity.

Authors:  Wade V Welshons; Kristina A Thayer; Barbara M Judy; Julia A Taylor; Edward M Curran; Frederick S vom Saal
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Region-specific growth effects in the developing rat prostate following fetal exposure to estrogenic ultraviolet filters.

Authors:  Luke Hofkamp; Sarahann Bradley; Jesus Tresguerres; Walter Lichtensteiger; Margret Schlumpf; Barry Timms
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Estrogen receptors and human disease: an update.

Authors:  Katherine A Burns; Kenneth S Korach
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  An illustrated anatomical ontology of the developing mouse lower urogenital tract.

Authors:  Kylie M Georgas; Jane Armstrong; Janet R Keast; Christine E Larkins; Kirk M McHugh; E Michelle Southard-Smith; Martin J Cohn; Ekatherina Batourina; Hanbin Dan; Kerry Schneider; Dennis P Buehler; Carrie B Wiese; Jane Brennan; Jamie A Davies; Simon D Harding; Richard A Baldock; Melissa H Little; Chad M Vezina; Cathy Mendelsohn
Journal:  Development       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 6.868

3.  Androgenic regulation of ventral epithelial bud number and pattern in mouse urogenital sinus.

Authors:  Sarah H Allgeier; Tien-Min Lin; Robert W Moore; Chad M Vezina; Lisa L Abler; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.780

4.  Insight and Resources From a Study of the "Impact of Sex, Androgens, and Prostate Size on C57BL/6J Mouse Urinary Physiology.

Authors:  Hannah Ruetten; Kyle A Wegner; Helen L Zhang; Peiqing Wang; Jaskiran Sandhu; Simran Sandhu; Jacquelyn Morkrid; Brett Mueller; Zunyi Wang; Jill Macoska; Richard E Peterson; Dale E Bjorling; William A Ricke; Paul C Marker; Chad M Vezina
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 1.902

Review 5.  A review of the carcinogenic potential of bisphenol A.

Authors:  Darcie D Seachrist; Kristen W Bonk; Shuk-Mei Ho; Gail S Prins; Ana M Soto; Ruth A Keri
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 3.143

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.