Literature DB >> 19523265

Pupil constriction evoked in vitro by stimulation of the oculomotor nerve in the turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans).

James R Dearworth1, J E Brenner, J F Blaum, T E Littlefield, D A Fink, J M Romano, M S Jones.   

Abstract

The pond turtle (Trachemys scripta elegans) exhibits a notably sluggish pupillary light reflex (PLR), with pupil constriction developing over several minutes following light onset. In the present study, we examined the dynamics of the efferent branch of the reflex in vitro using preparations consisting of either the isolated head or the enucleated eye. Stimulation of the oculomotor nerve (nIII) using 100-Hz current trains resulted in a maximal pupil constriction of 17.4% compared to 27.1% observed in the intact animal in response to light. When current amplitude was systematically increased from 1 to 400 microA, mean response latency decreased from 64 to 45 ms, but this change was not statistically significant. Hill equations fitted to these responses indicated a current threshold of 3.8 microA. Stimulation using single pulses evoked a smaller constriction (3.8%) with response latencies and threshold similar to that obtained using train stimulation. The response evoked by postganglionic stimulation of the ciliary nerve using 100-Hz trains was largely indistinguishable from that of train stimulation of nIII. However, application of single-pulse stimulation postganglionically resulted in smaller pupil constriction at all current levels relative to that of nIII stimulation, suggesting that there is amplification of efferent drive at the ganglion. Time constants for constrictions ranged from 88 to 154 ms with relaxations occurring more slowly at 174-361 ms. These values for timing from in vitro are much faster than the time constant 1.66 min obtained for the light response in the intact animal. The rapid dynamics of pupil constriction observed here suggest that the slow PLR of the turtle observed in vivo is not due to limitations of the efferent pathway. Rather, the sluggish response probably results from photoreceptive mechanisms or central processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19523265     DOI: 10.1017/S0952523809090099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  3 in total

1.  Ocular Kinematics Measured by In Vitro Stimulation of the Cranial Nerves in the Turtle.

Authors:  Maria Cano Garcia; Steven C Nesbit; Chi C Le; James R Dearworth
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 2.  The Edinger-Westphal nucleus: a historical, structural, and functional perspective on a dichotomous terminology.

Authors:  Tamás Kozicz; Jackson C Bittencourt; Paul J May; Anton Reiner; Paul D R Gamlin; Miklós Palkovits; Anja K E Horn; Claudio A B Toledo; Andrey E Ryabinin
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Asymmetric wavefront aberrations and pupillary shapes induced by electrical stimulation of ciliary nerve in cats measured with compact wavefront aberrometer.

Authors:  Suguru Miyagawa; Toshifumi Mihashi; Hiroyuki Kanda; Yoko Hirohara; Takao Endo; Takeshi Morimoto; Tomomitsu Miyoshi; Takashi Fujikado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.