Literature DB >> 19523077

Investigating socio-economic disparities in preterm birth: evidence for selective study participation and selection bias.

Michael S Kramer1, Russell Wilkins, Lise Goulet, Louise Séguin, John Lydon, Susan R Kahn, Helen McNamara, Clément Dassa, Mourad Dahhou, André Masse, Louise Miner, Guylaine Asselin, Henriette Gauthier, Antoinette Ghanem, Alice Benjamin, Robert W Platt.   

Abstract

Selective study participation can theoretically lead to selection bias. We explored this issue in the context of a multicentre cohort study of socio-economic disparities in preterm birth. Women with singleton pregnancies were recruited from four large Montreal maternity hospitals and invited to return for an interview, vaginal examination and venepuncture at 24-26 weeks of gestation. We compared the observed preterm birth rate (ultrasound confirmed) among the 5146 cohort women to that expected based on all 108 724 Montreal Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) singleton births for 1998-2000. The observed preterm birth rate in the study cohort was 5.1%, compared with 6.3% in the CMA (P < 0.001) (unadjusted morbidity ratio [95% CI] = 0.80 [0.71, 0.90]). Within each stratum of maternal education and neighbourhood income (the latter based on postal code matched links to the 2001 Canadian census), cohort women had substantially lower rates of preterm birth than women from the CMA. No significant association between socio-economic status (SES) and preterm birth was observed in the study cohort, except among 'indicated' (non-spontaneous) cases. The association between neighbourhood income and preterm birth was biased to the null in the study cohort, with adjusted odds ratios in the poorest vs. richest quintiles of 1.01 [0.63, 1.64] in the cohort vs. 1.28 [1.18, 1.39] in the CMA, although no such bias was observed for the association with maternal education assessed at the individual level. We speculate that the lower-than-expected preterm birth rate and attenuated association between neighbourhood income and preterm birth may be related to selective participation by women more psychologically invested in their pregnancies. Investigators should consider the potential for biased associations in pregnancy/birth cohort studies, especially associations based on SES or race/ethnicity, and carry out sensitivity analyses to gauge their effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19523077     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01042.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol        ISSN: 0269-5022            Impact factor:   3.980


  23 in total

1.  Neighborhood deprivation and maternal psychological distress during pregnancy: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Seungmi Yang; Yan Kestens; Mourad Dahhou; Mark Daniel; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-05

2.  Propensity score methods for confounding control in nonexperimental research.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Richard Wyss; J Bradley Layton; Til Stürmer
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-10

3.  Residential proximity to gasoline service stations and preterm birth.

Authors:  Vicky Huppé; Yan Kestens; Nathalie Auger; Mark Daniel; Audrey Smargiassi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Antenatal depressive symptoms among Canadian-born and immigrant women in Quebec: differential exposure and vulnerability to contextual risk factors.

Authors:  Malgorzata Miszkurka; Lise Goulet; Maria Victoria Zunzunegui
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  Contributions of immigration to depressive symptoms among pregnant women in Canada.

Authors:  Malgorzata Miszkurka; Lise Goulet; Maria Victoria Zunzunegui
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

Review 6.  Home visitation programs: an untapped opportunity for the delivery of early childhood obesity prevention.

Authors:  S-J Salvy; K de la Haye; T Galama; M I Goran
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 9.213

7.  Large prospective birth cohort studies on environmental contaminants and child health - goals, challenges, limitations and needs.

Authors:  Zhong-Cheng Luo; Jian-Meng Liu; William D Fraser
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 8.  Racial/ethnic disparities in obstetric outcomes and care: prevalence and determinants.

Authors:  Allison S Bryant; Ayaba Worjoloh; Aaron B Caughey; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Prenatal maternal depression and child serotonin transporter linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) and dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) genotype predict negative emotionality from 3 to 36 months.

Authors:  Cathryn Gordon Green; Vanessa Babineau; Alexia Jolicoeur-Martineau; Andrée-Anne Bouvette-Turcot; Klaus Minde; Roberto Sassi; Martin St-André; Normand Carrey; Leslie Atkinson; James L Kennedy; Meir Steiner; John Lydon; Helene Gaudreau; Jacob A Burack; Robert Levitan; Michael J Meaney; Ashley Wazana
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2016-07-18

10.  Prenatal depression and 5-HTTLPR interact to predict dysregulation from 3 to 36 months--a differential susceptibility model.

Authors:  Vanessa Babineau; Cathryn Gordon Green; Alexis Jolicoeur-Martineau; Andrée-Anne Bouvette-Turcot; Klaus Minde; Roberto Sassi; Martin St-André; Normand Carrey; Leslie Atkinson; James L Kennedy; John Lydon; Meir Steiner; Helene Gaudreau; Robert Levitan; Michael Meaney; Ashley Wazana
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 8.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.