Literature DB >> 19522907

Perceptions of the impact of a large-scale collaborative improvement programme: experience in the UK Safer Patients Initiative.

Jonathan Benn1, Susan Burnett, Anam Parand, Anna Pinto, Sandra Iskander, Charles Vincent.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND AIMS: In several countries, collaborative improvement programmes involving multiple health care organizations have been developed to address the issue of patient safety and reliability of care at an organization-wide level. In the UK, the Health Foundation's Safer Patients Initiative (SPI) was developed to achieve breakthrough improvement in the quality and safety of care in 24 acute hospital Trusts between 2004 and 2008. Research evidence for the effectiveness of programmes of this type and the mechanisms by which positive outcomes are achieved remains limited. We report a multi-method preliminary study based upon phase 1 of SPI to understand participant's perceptions of the local impact of the programme and to form the basis of future research in this area.
METHODS: Data were collected on the perceived local impact of SPI on a range of clinical, organizational and social dimensions relating to care quality and safety. Data were collected retrospectively from local SPI programme improvement teams using semi-structured interviews and surveys. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed, and the results synthesized under common themes and frameworks.
RESULTS: Specific dimensions of care systems commonly considered to be affected by SPI, included culture, strategic priority, organizational capability and clinical care delivery. Survey data revealed the perceived importance for success of a range of programme components: quality improvement methodology, learning sessions and programme faculty support, along with predefined clinical practice changes. Safety climate and capability dimensions rated as most sensitive to the effects of the SPI programme related to multi-professional engagement and communication, the degree of routine monitoring of care processes and the capacity to evaluate the impact of changes to clinical work systems.
CONCLUSIONS: Study findings support the view that programmes such as SPI have considerable impact upon the cultural, inter-professional, strategic and organizational aspects of care delivery, in addition to clinical working practices. The specific implications for understanding the effects of complex organization-level interventions and future research design are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19522907     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01145.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  10 in total

1.  The role of chief executive officers in a quality improvement : a qualitative study.

Authors:  Anam Parand; Sue Dopson; Charles Vincent
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Creating effective quality-improvement collaboratives: a multiple case study.

Authors:  Mathilde M H Strating; Anna P Nieboer; Teun Zuiderent-Jerak; Roland A Bal
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 3.  Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare.

Authors:  Michael J Taylor; Chris McNicholas; Chris Nicolay; Ara Darzi; Derek Bell; Julie E Reed
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 7.035

4.  An evaluation of methods used to teach quality improvement to undergraduate healthcare students to inform curriculum development within preregistration nurse education: a protocol for systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Lorraine Armstrong; William Lauder; Ashley Shepherd
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-14

5.  How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review.

Authors:  Karen Zamboni; Ulrika Baker; Mukta Tyagi; Joanna Schellenberg; Zelee Hill; Claudia Hanson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  The side effects of service changes: exploring the longitudinal impact of participation in a randomised controlled trial (DOORWAYS) on staff perceptions of barriers to change.

Authors:  Caroline Laker; Matteo Cella; Deborah Agbediro; Felicity Callard; Til Wykes
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  The organisational climate of NHS Early Intervention Services (EIS) for psychosis: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Francis Lammas; Alexandria Phillips; Sue Dopson; Eileen Joyce; Emese Csipke; Til Wykes
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  External Evaluation of Four Hospitals According to Patient-centred Care Standards.

Authors:  Nahid Tavakoli; Shirin Abbasi
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2013

9.  The challenge of change in acute mental health services: measuring staff perceptions of barriers to change and their relationship to job status and satisfaction using a new measure (VOCALISE).

Authors:  Caroline Laker; Felicity Callard; Clare Flach; Paul Williams; Jane Sayer; Til Wykes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Why is change a challenge in acute mental health wards? A cross-sectional investigation of the relationships between burnout, occupational status and nurses' perceptions of barriers to change.

Authors:  Caroline Laker; Matteo Cella; Felicity Callard; Til Wykes
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Nurs       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.503

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.