Literature DB >> 19521313

FDG PET for monitoring response to local and locoregional therapy in HCC and liver metastases.

R Dierckx1, A Maes, M Peeters, C Van De Wiele.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Local ablative therapies and loco-regional therapies are being increasingly used for the purpose of providing local control of primary liver tumors and liver metastases while sparing normal liver tissue. In this manuscript, literature on the use of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) to monitor local and loco-regional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastases, mainly limited to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is reviewed. Available data obtained primarily in secondary liver tumors and to a lesser extent in HCC support the notion that FDG PET performed early after RFA provides additional information about the efficacy of local tumor ablation by differentiating post-treatment changes from residual or recurrent malignant tumor. In addition, FDG PET was shown to have an added value for the detection of tumor recurrence. Thus, FDG PET imaging may not only improve treatment evaluation but also provide an opportunity for early re-intervention following RFA. Potential problems that might occur when using FDG PET for the purpose of evaluation of RFA are false negative results due to partial volume effect when dealing with small lesions (<1 cm) or due to diabetes and false positive results due to abscess formation. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these promising
RESULTS: With regard to SIRT, several studies, almost exclusively performed in patients suffering from liver metastases, have addressed the feasibility of using FDG PET for the assessment and quantification of metabolic response of SIRT with (90)Y-microspheres. These studies consistently show that traditional morphological imaging, computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging, is insensitive in monitoring response, owing to the presence of necrosis, edema, hemorrhage and cystic changes, when compared to metabolic imaging. Thus, in view of the lack of reliability of tumor markers and/or the potential for delineating the presence of extra-hepatic metastatic cancers in these patients, when confirmed by additional studies, FDG PET may prove to be an excellent adjunct for assessing response following SIRT of liver metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19521313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1824-4785            Impact factor:   2.346


  10 in total

1.  The role of early ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in prediction of progression-free survival after ⁹⁰Y radioembolization: comparison with RECIST and tumour density criteria.

Authors:  I Zerizer; A Al-Nahhas; D Towey; P Tait; B Ariff; H Wasan; G Hatice; N Habib; T Barwick
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for assessing response to radiofrequency ablation treatment in lung metastases: a multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  Françoise Bonichon; Jean Palussière; Yann Godbert; Marina Pulido; Edouard Descat; Anne Devillers; Catherine Meunier; Sophie Leboulleux; Thierry de Baère; Claire Galy-Lacour; Laurent Lagoarde-Segot; Anne-Laure Cazeau
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Value of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation with or without percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and functional recovery in painful bone metastases.

Authors:  Frédéric Clarençon; Betty Jean; Hang-Phuong Pham; Evelyne Cormier; Gilbert Bensimon; Michèle Rose; Philippe Maksud; Jacques Chiras
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Positron emission tomography in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancies: a review.

Authors:  Billy Y Lan; Sandi A Kwee; Linda L Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Kinetic analysis of FDG in rat liver: effect of dietary intervention on arterial and portal vein input.

Authors:  Sudheer D Rani; Samuel T Nemanich; Nicole Fettig; Kooresh I Shoghi
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Treatment of hepatic carcinoma by low-frequency ultrasound and microbubbles: A case report.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Shen; Ming-Feng Wu; Yi-Xin Zhang; Kang Shen; Gan-Lin Xia
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Does 18F-FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography have a role in initial staging of hepatocellular carcinoma?

Authors:  Yuri Cho; Dong Hyeon Lee; Yun Bin Lee; Minjong Lee; Jeong-Ju Yoo; Won-Mook Choi; Young Youn Cho; Jin Chul Paeng; Keon Wook Kang; June-Key Chung; Su Jong Yu; Jeong-Hoon Lee; Jung-Hwan Yoon; Hyo-Suk Lee; Yoon Jun Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Interstitial brachytherapy for liver metastases and assessment of response by positron emission tomography: a case report.

Authors:  Daya Nand Sharma; Sanjay Thulkar; Rakesh Kumar; Goura Kishor Rath
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2010-10-13

Review 9.  Molecular Imaging of Tumor Microenvironment to Assess the Effects of Locoregional Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Quan Chen; Austin Z Chen; Guorong Jia; Jindian Li; Chuansheng Zheng; Kai Chen
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2021-11-05

Review 10.  Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis, staging and treatment monitoring.

Authors:  Tiffany Hennedige; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.