OBJECTIVES:Acute gouty arthritis is often treated with NSAIDs, but recent studies have suggested that treatment with prednisolone has at least equivalent analgesic efficacy and fewer adverse effects. No formal economic analysis has been performed earlier. In this study, we aimed to compare the economic impact of oral indomethacin therapy and oral prednisolone therapy in the treatment of acute gout in patients presenting to an emergency department in Hong Kong. METHODS: Data from a previously published randomized controlled trial were used to compare the costs of the two treatment options. Direct, incremental costs incurred in the 2 weeks after the initial presentation were considered from the perspective of the healthcare provider. Costs were subdivided into those incurred in the emergency department phase; admission on day 1 to the emergency department's observation ward; admission subsequently to the general medical ward for adverse events and reattendance to the hospital outpatients' or emergency department. RESULTS: The prednisolone strategy resulted in cost savings in the emergency department of HK$5.67 (US$0.73; pound0.37) and in medical admissions of HK$1727.48 (US$221.47; pound111.45) per patient treated. Overall, the average saving with prednisolone was HK$1235 (US$158.33; pound79.68) per patient treated, which was equivalent to one admission bed/day saved for every two patients treated. Treatment for each of the six patients in the indomethacin group admitted for serious adverse effects cost the healthcare provider HK$13 244 (US$1697.95; pound854.45). CONCLUSION: Treatment of acute gouty arthritis with a 5-day course of prednisolone is significantly more cost-effective than treatment with indomethacin.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES:Acute gouty arthritis is often treated with NSAIDs, but recent studies have suggested that treatment with prednisolone has at least equivalent analgesic efficacy and fewer adverse effects. No formal economic analysis has been performed earlier. In this study, we aimed to compare the economic impact of oral indomethacin therapy and oral prednisolone therapy in the treatment of acute gout in patients presenting to an emergency department in Hong Kong. METHODS: Data from a previously published randomized controlled trial were used to compare the costs of the two treatment options. Direct, incremental costs incurred in the 2 weeks after the initial presentation were considered from the perspective of the healthcare provider. Costs were subdivided into those incurred in the emergency department phase; admission on day 1 to the emergency department's observation ward; admission subsequently to the general medical ward for adverse events and reattendance to the hospital outpatients' or emergency department. RESULTS: The prednisolone strategy resulted in cost savings in the emergency department of HK$5.67 (US$0.73; pound0.37) and in medical admissions of HK$1727.48 (US$221.47; pound111.45) per patient treated. Overall, the average saving with prednisolone was HK$1235 (US$158.33; pound79.68) per patient treated, which was equivalent to one admission bed/day saved for every two patients treated. Treatment for each of the six patients in the indomethacin group admitted for serious adverse effects cost the healthcare provider HK$13 244 (US$1697.95; pound854.45). CONCLUSION: Treatment of acute gouty arthritis with a 5-day course of prednisolone is significantly more cost-effective than treatment with indomethacin.
Authors: Dinesh Khanna; Puja P Khanna; John D Fitzgerald; Manjit K Singh; Sangmee Bae; Tuhina Neogi; Michael H Pillinger; Joan Merill; Susan Lee; Shraddha Prakash; Marian Kaldas; Maneesh Gogia; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Will Taylor; Frédéric Lioté; Hyon Choi; Jasvinder A Singh; Nicola Dalbeth; Sanford Kaplan; Vandana Niyyar; Danielle Jones; Steven A Yarows; Blake Roessler; Gail Kerr; Charles King; Gerald Levy; Daniel E Furst; N Lawrence Edwards; Brian Mandell; H Ralph Schumacher; Mark Robbins; Neil Wenger; Robert Terkeltaub Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 4.794