Literature DB >> 19521258

Comparison between implants inserted with and without computer planning and custom model coordination.

Matteo Danza1, Ilaria Zollino, Francesco Carinci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In the last decade, several systems for computer-planned implantology have been reported. Among them is a system that uses software and a three-dimensional parallelometer able to transfer the implant position from the virtual project to the master model. To verify the effectiveness of this system, a retrospective comparative study has been planned.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A series of 300 implants were analyzed. Sixty-six were inserted with computer planning. Several variables related to patient, anatomic site, implant, and surgery were investigated. Implants' failure and peri-implant bone resorption were considered as predictors of clinical outcome. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were then performed to detect those variables statistically associated with the clinical outcome.
RESULTS: Implant length and diameter ranged from 10 to 16 mm and from 3.75 to 6.0 mm, respectively. Implants were inserted to replace 66 incisors, 39 canines, 116 premolars, and 79 molars. Mean follow-up was 14 months. Nine implants were lost (survival rate, 97%), but no differences were detected among the studied variables. On the contrary, lower crestal bone resorption was detected for implants inserted in healed bone and in anterior jaws.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-planned and cast model-transferred implantology give good clinical results in survival and success rate. It is a useful technology that should be used in most difficult cases such as totally edentulous patients and reduced crestal bone volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19521258     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181abb322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  5 in total

1.  Polymerization shrinkage and spherical glass mega fillers: effects on cuspal deflection.

Authors:  M Andreasi Bassi; S Serra; C Andrisani; S Lico; L Baggi; D Lauritano
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14

2.  The use of various biomaterials in computer-guided crestal sinus lift procedures. A report on two case studies with volume comparison.

Authors:  M A Lopez; S Lico; M Casale; Z Ormanier; F Carinci
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

3.  A new spiral dental implant: a tool for oral rehabilitation of difficult cases.

Authors:  I Balan; R Calcaterra; D Lauritano; E Grecchi; F Carinci
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-11-30

4.  Management and control of isotonic contraction generated stress: evaluation of masseter muscle deformation pattern by means of ecography.

Authors:  A Busato; G Balconi; V Vismara; L Bertelè; G Garo; D DE Gregorio
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-02-14

5.  Flapless versus conventional flapped dental implant surgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic; Tomas Albrektsson; Ann Wennerberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.