Literature DB >> 1952110

The anatomy and fine structure of the echidna Tachyglossus aculeatus snout with respect to its different trigeminal sensory receptors including the electroreceptors.

K H Andres1, M von Düring, A Iggo, U Proske.   

Abstract

The gross anatomy and nerve supply of the bill of echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus) is described in relation to its function as an outstanding sensory organ. The sensory innervation of the skin of the echidna snout was investigated by means of frontal serial sections, after decalcification of the specimens. A comprehensive light and electron microscopic description of the location and fine structure of cutaneous sensory receptors of the trigeminal system was made by this means. The encapsulated and non-encapsulated Ruffini receptors, the types of other free receptors in the connective tissue and the Merkel cell receptor do not differ morphologically from those of higher mammals, whereas the pacinian-like corpuscle shows a unique organization of its outer core. This is composed of large perineural cells containing a unique reticulum of parallel-orientated endoplasmic membranes. Lamellated corpuscles, seen in isolation or in association with push rods, are numerous in the snout and in the tip of the tongue of echidna. Push rod receptor organs occur in the hairless skin of the bill with a very dense array at its rostral end and in the pseudopalatal ridges. Gland duct receptors are restricted to the skin adjacent to the nostrils and the mouth opening, including the pseudopalatal plates. Only about one quarter of the total number of 400 seromucous glands receive a sensory innervation of their intraepidermal duct segment. Within each innervated gland two types of receptor terminals are identified. The distributions of the different receptor types are mapped for different regions of the skin, the mucous membrane of the nasal and oral vestibule and the tip of the tongue. The fine structure of nerve terminals is discussed from a comparative anatomical point of view, and some speculations are made about possible transduction processes that underlie the known electrophysiological properties. The sensory organs such as the "push rod" and "gland duct receptor", and most of their sensory terminals, are less differentiated in echidna snout than in the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus) bill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1952110     DOI: 10.1007/bf00957899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)        ISSN: 0340-2061


  17 in total

1.  [Graphic reconstruction for spatial representation of preterminal vessels and intravasal particularities].

Authors:  J STAUBESAND; K H ANDRES
Journal:  Mikroskopie       Date:  1953

2.  Responses of electroreceptors in the snout of the echidna.

Authors:  J E Gregory; A Iggo; A K McIntyre; U Proske
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Cutaneous electroreceptors in the platypus: a new mammalian receptor.

Authors:  A Iggo; U Proske; A K McIntyre; J E Gregory
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.453

4.  The structure and function of the slowly adapting type II mechanoreceptor in hairy skin.

Authors:  M R Chambers; K H Andres; M von Duering; A Iggo
Journal:  Q J Exp Physiol Cogn Med Sci       Date:  1972-10

5.  [Innervation of hairless skin of the nose of mole. I. Intraepidermal nerve endings].

Authors:  Z Halata
Journal:  Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat       Date:  1972

6.  Electroreceptors in the platypus.

Authors:  J E Gregory; A Iggo; A K McIntyre; U Proske
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Mar 26-Apr 1       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Nerve fibres and their terminals of the dura mater encephali of the rat.

Authors:  K H Andres; M von Düring; K Muszynski; R F Schmidt
Journal:  Anat Embryol (Berl)       Date:  1987

8.  [Interference phenomena on the osmiumtetroxide fixed specimen for systematic electronmicroscopical investigation (author's transl)].

Authors:  K H Andres; M von Düring
Journal:  Mikroskopie       Date:  1974-06

9.  Receptors in the bill of the platypus.

Authors:  J E Gregory; A Iggo; A K McIntyre; U Proske
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Warm and cold receptors in the nose of the vampire bat Desmodus rotundus.

Authors:  L Kürten; U Schmidt; K Schäfer
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1984-06
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Evolution of brains and behavior for optimal foraging: a tale of two predators.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Neuroanatomical evidence for segregation of nerve fibers conveying light touch and pain sensation in Eimer's organ of the mole.

Authors:  Paul D Marasco; Pamela R Tsuruda; Diana M Bautista; David Julius; Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Evolutionary Specialization of Tactile Perception in Vertebrates.

Authors:  Eve R Schneider; Elena O Gracheva; Slav N Bagriantsev
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-05

Review 4.  Sensory receptors in monotremes.

Authors:  U Proske; J E Gregory; A Iggo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The development of the electroreceptors of the platypus (Ornithorhynchus anatinus).

Authors:  P R Manger; R Collins; J D Pettigrew
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1998-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The neurobiology and behavior of the American water shrew (Sorex palustris).

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Water shrews detect movement, shape, and smell to find prey underwater.

Authors:  Kenneth C Catania; James F Hare; Kevin L Campbell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Structure, innervation and response properties of integumentary sensory organs in crocodilians.

Authors:  Duncan B Leitch; Kenneth C Catania
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Palaeoneurological clues to the evolution of defining mammalian soft tissue traits.

Authors:  J Benoit; P R Manger; B S Rubidge
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Crocodylians evolved scattered multi-sensory micro-organs.

Authors:  Nicolas Di-Poï; Michel C Milinkovitch
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 2.250

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.