Literature DB >> 19520760

Serum free light chain ratio, total kappa/lambda ratio, and immunofixation results are not prognostic factors after stem cell transplantation for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Manuela M Giarin1, Luisa Giaccone, Roberto Sorasio, Christian Sfiligoi, Barbara Amoroso, Federica Cavallo, Alessia Cipriani, Antonio Palumbo, Mario Boccadoro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of changes in paraprotein markers after stem cell transplantation is unknown. We evaluated disease response using serum immunofixation (s-IFIX), total kappa and lambda ratio (KLR), and free light chain (FLC) ratio in myeloma patients who underwent autologous or autologous plus allogeneic stem cell transplantation.
METHODS: We studied s-IFIX, KLR, and FLC ratio in sera from 203 patients, 3 months after transplantation. We evaluated overall and event-free survival (OS and EFS, interval between date of study enrollment and date of death from any cause or date of progression, relapse, or death from any cause, respectively) by the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Of the 203 patients, 51 were negative by s-IFIX, 99 reached a normal KLR, and 92 had a normal FLC ratio. Of the 51 patients with negative s-IFIX, 40 (78%) also had a normal FLC ratio. The median duration of OS was 54.3 months, and the median EFS was 19.5 months. None of the measured paraprotein parameters showed an association with OS. Only a normal KLR was associated with prolonged EFS (P = 0.016). Even a negative s-IFIX associated with a normal FLC ratio did not show a significant difference in terms of EFS and OS.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis with a small cohort of patients did not show a significant impact of achieving complete response (CR) or stringent CR on patient survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19520760     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.124370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  10 in total

1.  Serum free light chains in myeloma patients with an intact M protein by immunofixation: potential roles for response assessment and prognosis during induction therapy with novel agents.

Authors:  Sherry Mori; Brooke S Crawford; Julianna Vf Roddy; Gary Phillips; Pat Elder; Craig C Hofmeister; Yvonne Efebera; Don M Benson
Journal:  Hematol Oncol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 5.271

Review 2.  New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Defining the impact of individual sample variability on routine immunoassay of serum free light chains (sFLC) in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  S H K Murng; L Follows; P Whitfield; J A Snowden; K Swallow; K Green; R Sargur; W Egner
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Critical analysis of the stringent complete response in multiple myeloma: contribution of sFLC and bone marrow clonality.

Authors:  Joaquín Martínez-López; Bruno Paiva; Lucía López-Anglada; María-Victoria Mateos; Teresa Cedena; María-Belén Vidríales; María Auxiliadora Sáez-Gómez; Teresa Contreras; Albert Oriol; Inmaculada Rapado; Ana-Isabel Teruel; Lourdes Cordón; María Jesús Blanchard; Enrique Bengoechea; Luis Palomera; Felipe de Arriba; Cecilia Cueto-Felgueroso; Alberto Orfao; Joan Bladé; Jesús F San Miguel; Juan José Lahuerta
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Deep Response in Multiple Myeloma: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Mariateresa Fulciniti; Nikhil C Munshi; Joaquin Martinez-Lopez
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Minimal residual disease after transplantation or lenalidomide-based consolidation in myeloma patients: a prospective analysis.

Authors:  Stefania Oliva; Manuela Gambella; Milena Gilestro; Vittorio Emanuele Muccio; Francesca Gay; Daniela Drandi; Simone Ferrero; Roberto Passera; Chiara Pautasso; Annalisa Bernardini; Mariella Genuardi; Francesca Patriarca; Elona Saraci; Maria Teresa Petrucci; Norbert Pescosta; Anna Marina Liberati; Tommaso Caravita; Concetta Conticello; Alberto Rocci; Pellegrino Musto; Mario Boccadoro; Antonio Palumbo; Paola Omedè
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-01-24

7.  Tumor Reduction in Multiple Myeloma: New Concepts for New Therapeutics.

Authors:  Rafael Alonso; Juan José Lahuerta
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  Minimal residual disease detection by next-generation sequencing in multiple myeloma: Promise and challenges for response-adapted therapy.

Authors:  Valeria Ferla; Elena Antonini; Tommaso Perini; Francesca Farina; Serena Masottini; Simona Malato; Sarah Marktel; Maria Teresa Lupo Stanghellini; Cristina Tresoldi; Fabio Ciceri; Magda Marcatti
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Potential role of exosome-associated microRNA panels and in vivo environment to predict drug resistance for patients with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Li Zhang; Ling Pan; Bing Xiang; Huanling Zhu; Yu Wu; Meng Chen; Pujun Guan; Xingli Zou; C Alexander Valencia; Biao Dong; Jianjun Li; Liping Xie; Hongbing Ma; Fangfang Wang; Tian Dong; Xiao Shuai; Ting Niu; Ting Liu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-05-24

10.  Disease spectrum of abnormal serum free light chain ratio and its diagnostic significance.

Authors:  Bin Xu; Yi Tang; Jianfeng Zhou; Peiling Zhang; Huijun Li
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.