PURPOSE: Dysfunction of pharyngeal constrictors (PCs) after chemo-irradiation of head and neck (HN) cancer has been proposed as major cause of dysphagia. We conducted prospective MRI study to evaluate anatomical changes in the PCs after chemo-irradiation, to gain insight of the mechanism of their dysfunction and their dose-effect relationships. The PCs were compared to the sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCMs), which receive high doses but do not relate to swallowing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with stage III-IV HN cancer underwent MRI before and 3 months after completing chemo-irradiation. T1- and T2-weighted signals and muscle thickness were evaluated for PCs (superior, middle, and inferior), and SCMs. Mean muscle doses were determined after registration with the planning CT. RESULTS: T1-weighted signals decreased in both PCs and SCMs receiving >50 Gy (p<0.03), but not in muscles receiving lower doses. T2-weighted signals in the PCs increased significantly as the dose increased (R(2)=0.34, p=0.01). The T2 signal changes in the PCs were significantly higher than the T2 changes in the SCMs (p<0.001). Increased thickness was noted in all PCs, with muscles receiving >50 Gy gaining significantly more thickness than PCs receiving lesser doses (p=0.02). In contrast, the SCM thickness decreased post-therapy (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: These MRI-based findings, notably the differences between PCs and SCMs, suggest that underlying causes of PC dysfunction are inflammation and edema, likely consequential to acute mucositis affecting the submucosa-lying PCs. These results support reducing mean PC doses to 50 Gy, as well as reducing acute mucositis, to improve long-term dysphagia.
PURPOSE: Dysfunction of pharyngeal constrictors (PCs) after chemo-irradiation of head and neck (HN) cancer has been proposed as major cause of dysphagia. We conducted prospective MRI study to evaluate anatomical changes in the PCs after chemo-irradiation, to gain insight of the mechanism of their dysfunction and their dose-effect relationships. The PCs were compared to the sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCMs), which receive high doses but do not relate to swallowing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with stage III-IV HN cancer underwent MRI before and 3 months after completing chemo-irradiation. T1- and T2-weighted signals and muscle thickness were evaluated for PCs (superior, middle, and inferior), and SCMs. Mean muscle doses were determined after registration with the planning CT. RESULTS: T1-weighted signals decreased in both PCs and SCMs receiving >50 Gy (p<0.03), but not in muscles receiving lower doses. T2-weighted signals in the PCs increased significantly as the dose increased (R(2)=0.34, p=0.01). The T2 signal changes in the PCs were significantly higher than the T2 changes in the SCMs (p<0.001). Increased thickness was noted in all PCs, with muscles receiving >50 Gy gaining significantly more thickness than PCs receiving lesser doses (p=0.02). In contrast, the SCM thickness decreased post-therapy (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: These MRI-based findings, notably the differences between PCs and SCMs, suggest that underlying causes of PC dysfunction are inflammation and edema, likely consequential to acute mucositis affecting the submucosa-lying PCs. These results support reducing mean PC doses to 50 Gy, as well as reducing acute mucositis, to improve long-term dysphagia.
Authors: Delva R Shamley; Ragavan Srinanaganathan; Rosamund Weatherall; Reza Oskrochi; Marion Watson; Simon Ostlere; Elaine Sugden Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2007-01-13 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Peter C Levendag; David N Teguh; Peter Voet; Henri van der Est; Inge Noever; Wilhelmus J M de Kruijf; Inger-Karine Kolkman-Deurloo; Jean-Briac Prevost; Johan Poll; Paul I M Schmitz; Ben J Heijmen Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2007-08-21 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Ken Dornfeld; Shane Hopkins; Joel Simmons; Douglas R Spitz; Yusuf Menda; Michael Graham; Russell Smith; Gerry Funk; Lucy Karnell; Michael Karnell; Maude Dornfeld; Min Yao; John Buatti Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Hale B Caglar; Roy B Tishler; Megan Othus; Elaine Burke; Yi Li; Laura Goguen; Lori J Wirth; Robert I Haddad; Carl M Norris; Laurence E Court; Donald J Aninno; Marshall R Posner; Aaron M Allen Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-05-28 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Johannes A Langendijk; Patricia Doornaert; Derek H F Rietveld; Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw; C René Leemans; Ben J Slotman Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2009-01-21 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: R Mazzola; F Ricchetti; A Fiorentino; N Giaj-Levra; S Fersino; U Tebano; S Albanese; S Gori; F Alongi Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-11-16 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Minh Tam Truong; Richard Lee; Naoko Saito; Muhammad M Qureshi; Al Ozonoff; Paul B Romesser; Jimmy Wang; Osamu Sakai Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Avraham Eisbruch; Hyungjin M Kim; Felix Y Feng; Teresa H Lyden; Marc J Haxer; Mary Feng; Frank P Worden; Carol R Bradford; Mark E Prince; Jeffrey S Moyer; Gregory T Wolf; Douglas B Chepeha; Randall K Ten Haken Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-05-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Klaudia U Hunter; Matthew Schipper; Felix Y Feng; Teresa Lyden; Mark Haxer; Carol-Anne Murdoch-Kinch; Benjamin Cornwall; Connie S Y Lee; Douglas B Chepeha; Avraham Eisbruch Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jay A Messer; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Katherine A Hutcheson; Yao Ding; Jan S Lewin; Jihong Wang; Stephen Y Lai; Steven J Frank; Adam S Garden; Vlad Sandulache; Hillary Eichelberger; Chloe C French; Rivka R Colen; Jack Phan; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; John D Hazle; David I Rosenthal; G Brandon Gunn; Clifton D Fuller Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 6.280