Literature DB >> 19520327

Robotic magnetic navigation for ablation of human arrhythmias: initial experience.

Decebal G Latcu1, Philippe Ricard, Naima Zarqane, Khelil Yaici, Jean-Paul Rinaldi, Alexandre Maluski, Nadir Saoudi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnetic navigation system (MNS) (Niobe, Stereotaxis, Saint-Louis, Missouri, USA) allows remote control of a radiofrequency ablation catheter using a steerable magnetic field and a catheter advancement system. AIMS: We report our initial experience of ablation of human arrhythmias using the MNS.
METHODS: Eighty-four patients (mean age 54+/-17years; 39 women) had an electrophysiologic study followed by ablation with the MNS using non-irrigated 4, 8 and 3.5mm-tip catheters with three distal magnets. All patients were symptomatic, with commonly-accepted indications for ablation: atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT; n=37); typical atrial flutter (n=15); accessory pathway (n=12); atypical atrial flutter (n=7); ventricular tachycardia (n=7); atrial tachycardia (n=3); paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (n=3). Electroanatomical mapping was used for atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, atrial tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia procedures (29 patients, 34%).
RESULTS: Ablation was performed successfully in 69 (82%) patients. In 15 patients (18%), MNS technique was unsuccessful: seven typical atrial flutters, four accessory pathways, two left atrial flutters after atrial fibrillation ablation, one ventricular tachycardia and one AVNRT; in all these cases except one typical atrial flutter and two left atrial flutters, success was obtained by switching to the manual technique by means of an irrigated catheter. Total fluoroscopy time was 14+/-11minutes; operator exposure fluoroscopy time was 1.5+/-0.6minutes; procedure time was 169+/-72minutes.
CONCLUSION: MNS ablation is a feasible treatment for various human arrhythmias, with a high success rate. Mapping with a magnetic catheter is safe. However, magnetic ablation of typical atrial flutter remains challenging, probably because of insufficient pressure for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19520327     DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 1875-2128            Impact factor:   2.340


  4 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of remote magnetic navigation for ablation of supraventricular tachycardias.

Authors:  Sung-Hwan Kim; Yong-Seog Oh; Dong-Hwi Kim; Ik Jun Choi; Tae-Seok Kim; Woo-Seung Shin; Ji-Hoon Kim; Sung-Won Jang; Man Young Lee; Tai-Ho Rho
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Magnetic guidance versus manual control: comparison of radiofrequency lesion dimensions and evaluation of the effect of heart wall motion in a myocardial phantom.

Authors:  Abhishek Bhaskaran; M A Tony Barry; Sara I Al Raisi; William Chik; Doan Trang Nguyen; Jim Pouliopoulos; Chrishan Nalliah; Roger Hendricks; Stuart Thomas; Alistair L McEwan; Pramesh Kovoor; Aravinda Thiagalingam
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 3.  Safety and efficacy of the remote magnetic navigation for ablation of ventricular tachycardias--a systematic review.

Authors:  Ferdi Akca; Ibrahim Önsesveren; Luc Jordaens; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Advances in imaging for atrial fibrillation ablation.

Authors:  Andrew D'Silva; Matthew Wright
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-02-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.