Literature DB >> 19516338

The proportionality of global warming to cumulative carbon emissions.

H Damon Matthews1, Nathan P Gillett, Peter A Stott, Kirsten Zickfeld.   

Abstract

The global temperature response to increasing atmospheric CO(2) is often quantified by metrics such as equilibrium climate sensitivity and transient climate response. These approaches, however, do not account for carbon cycle feedbacks and therefore do not fully represent the net response of the Earth system to anthropogenic CO(2) emissions. Climate-carbon modelling experiments have shown that: (1) the warming per unit CO(2) emitted does not depend on the background CO(2) concentration; (2) the total allowable emissions for climate stabilization do not depend on the timing of those emissions; and (3) the temperature response to a pulse of CO(2) is approximately constant on timescales of decades to centuries. Here we generalize these results and show that the carbon-climate response (CCR), defined as the ratio of temperature change to cumulative carbon emissions, is approximately independent of both the atmospheric CO(2) concentration and its rate of change on these timescales. From observational constraints, we estimate CCR to be in the range 1.0-2.1 degrees C per trillion tonnes of carbon (Tt C) emitted (5th to 95th percentiles), consistent with twenty-first-century CCR values simulated by climate-carbon models. Uncertainty in land-use CO(2) emissions and aerosol forcing, however, means that higher observationally constrained values cannot be excluded. The CCR, when evaluated from climate-carbon models under idealized conditions, represents a simple yet robust metric for comparing models, which aggregates both climate feedbacks and carbon cycle feedbacks. CCR is also likely to be a useful concept for climate change mitigation and policy; by combining the uncertainties associated with climate sensitivity, carbon sinks and climate-carbon feedbacks into a single quantity, the CCR allows CO(2)-induced global mean temperature change to be inferred directly from cumulative carbon emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19516338     DOI: 10.1038/nature08047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  4 in total

1.  Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions.

Authors:  Susan Solomon; Gian-Kasper Plattner; Reto Knutti; Pierre Friedlingstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Setting cumulative emissions targets to reduce the risk of dangerous climate change.

Authors:  Kirsten Zickfeld; Michael Eby; H Damon Matthews; Andrew J Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Warming caused by cumulative carbon emissions towards the trillionth tonne.

Authors:  Myles R Allen; David J Frame; Chris Huntingford; Chris D Jones; Jason A Lowe; Malte Meinshausen; Nicolai Meinshausen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2 growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks.

Authors:  Josep G Canadell; Corinne Le Quéré; Michael R Raupach; Christopher B Field; Erik T Buitenhuis; Philippe Ciais; Thomas J Conway; Nathan P Gillett; R A Houghton; Gregg Marland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 11.205

  4 in total
  37 in total

1.  Disentangling the effects of CO2 and short-lived climate forcer mitigation.

Authors:  Joeri Rogelj; Michiel Schaeffer; Malte Meinshausen; Drew T Shindell; William Hare; Zbigniew Klimont; Guus J M Velders; Markus Amann; Hans Joachim Schellnhuber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The impact of first-generation biofuels on the depletion of the global phosphorus reserve.

Authors:  Lars Hein; Rik Leemans
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 3.  Options for change in the Australian energy profile.

Authors:  Stephen F Lincoln
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  The future of oil supply.

Authors:  Richard G Miller; Steven R Sorrell
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Historical warming reduced due to enhanced land carbon uptake.

Authors:  Elena Shevliakova; Ronald J Stouffer; Sergey Malyshev; John P Krasting; George C Hurtt; Stephen W Pacala
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options.

Authors:  Brian C O'Neill; Keywan Riahi; Ilkka Keppo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Warming goal: clear link to emissions.

Authors:  H Damon Matthews
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C.

Authors:  Christophe McGlade; Paul Ekins
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Climate change hotspots in the CMIP5 global climate model ensemble.

Authors:  Noah S Diffenbaugh; Filippo Giorgi
Journal:  Clim Change       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.743

10.  Health scenarios for a warming world.

Authors:  Catherine M Cooney
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.