| Literature DB >> 19516073 |
Scott A Harding1, Michelle M Jarvie, Richard L Lindroth, Chung-Jui Tsai.
Abstract
The biosynthetic costs of phenylpropanoid-derived condensed tannins (Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19516073 PMCID: PMC2724693 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp180
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Bot ISSN: 0022-0957 Impact factor: 6.992
Height and biomass accrual of hydroponically grown plants
| SG | FG | df | |||
| Height | |||||
| Initial height (IH, cm) | 106±8.8 | 118±10.3 | – | – | – |
| New height growth (NH, cm) | 78±3.6 | 103±7.5 | 8.38 | 14 | <0.001 |
| Incremental change (NH/IH) | 0.74±0.06 | 0.88±0.1 | 3.28 | 14 | 0.005 |
| Upper stem (new growth) biomass | |||||
| Leaf (g) | 6.4±0.9 | 11.9±2.2 | * | * | <0.001 |
| Stem (g) | 7.6±1.4 | 7.4±0.9 | −0.46 | 14 | 0.656 |
| Total (g) | 14.1±2.1 | 19.2±2.9 | 4.09 | 14 | 0.001 |
| Lower stem biomass | |||||
| Leaf (g) | 23.4±8.1 | 18.1±7.9 | −1.27 | 14 | 0.224 |
| Stem (g) | 28.4±6.8 | 34.0±4.6 | 1.94 | 14 | 0.073 |
| Root biomass | |||||
| Root (g) | 12.2±3.3 | 19.2±4.7 | 3.59 | 15 | 0.003 |
| Root-to-shoot ratio | 0.18 | 0.24 | – | – | – |
Means and standard deviations of biometric data were determined using n=8 plants of each genotype. Lower stem leaf biomass included twigs. Statistical significance of the difference between clone means was determined using the two-sample t-test for parametric data, and the Mann–Whitney rank sum test for non-parametric data (*).
Fig. 1.Leaf expansion and chlorophyll fluorescence. (A) Dry masses of fully expanded leaves that occupied LPI positions +1, –1, and –3, denoted as pre(+1), pre(–1) and pre(–3), respectively, at the start of the 8 week experiment, and of expanding leaves that occupied LPI positions 2, 4, 5, 8, and 10 at the time of harvest. Data represent the means and SD of eight plants. (B) Quantum yield of PSII and variable fluorescence of expanding leaves. Data represent the means and SD of three plants for each LPI position, each derived from the mean of 36 instrument readings.
Fig. 2.Tissue concentrations of NSP constituents, PG and CT, in leaves, roots, and stem internodes of the two clones. (A) Phenolic glycosides. (B) Condensed tannins. Shown are data (% dry weight) from expanding leaf (LPI-3), fully expanded source leaf (LPI-6), upper stem internodes near expanding leaves (Int 1–6), upper stem internodes along a developmental gradient of maturing source leaves (Int 7–8 and 9–13), and elongating root and coarse root fractions. Internode number increases basipetally. Replicates (n) ranged from 11 to 15 plants for each LPI, from 7 to 11 plants for each subset of internodes, and from 15 to 16 plants for each root fraction. Comparisons between clones were made for each organ fraction shown. The two-sample t-test was used to determine significance of differences between clone means, indicated by asterisks above the SG histogram bars (*P <0.05; **P <0.01; ***P <0.001).
Fig. 3.Tissue concentrations of (A) soluble sugars and (B) starch. Shown are data (% dry weight) from expanding leaf (LPI-3), fully expanded source leaf (LPI-6), upper stem internodes near expanding leaves (Int 1–6), and upper stem internodes along a developmental gradient of maturing source leaves (Int 7–8 and 9–13), and elongating root and coarse root fractions. Replicate numbers and significance testing are as in Fig. 2.
Fig. 4.Lignin and cellulose in developing stems. (A) Klason lignin and (B) ADF cellulose (% dry weight). Each of the upper internode data points (Int 7–8, Int 9–10) represents the mean and SD of 4–6 determinations. The mid-stem internode data points (Int 20–25) represent the means of eight (SG) and 16 (FG) determinations. In several cases, SD bars are present but are smaller than the data symbol. Exceptions are the Int 1–6 and Int 11–12 data points which represent single determinations from pooled stems with no SD. Internode replicates (n) differ from those in Figs 2 and 3 because pooling of stem internodes necessary for lignin and cellulose determinations differed from that for other stem internode assays.
Fig. 5.Lignin UV autofluorescence of primary–secondary transitional stem internodes. Shown are internode 3 from FG (A) and SG (B), and internode 6 from FG (C) and SG (D). Images were obtained from 75 μm vibratome sections using an excitation wavelength of 365 nm. Scale bar=500 μm. The arrow placed across the xylem is to facilitate a comparison of secondary xylem width which was wider in FG than in SG. pf, phloem fibre; xy, xylem.
Fig. 6.Regression analysis of starch concentrations between expanding (LPI-3) and fully expanded source (LPI-6) leaves. Starch data were collected from leaves of 26 plants for the analysis.
Correlation analysis of starch and cellulose concentrations in leaves
| Parameter | ||
| LPI-8 cellulose versus LPI-6 starch | ||
| SG, | −0.449 | 0.16 |
| FG, | −0.908 | <0.001 |
| LPI-3 starch versus LPI-6 starch | ||
| All, | 0.938 | <0.001 |
Fig. 7.Lignin and cellulose concentrations in root fractions. (A) Klason lignin of elongating and coarse root fractions and (B) ADF cellulose of elongating and coarse root fractions (both in % dry weight). Histogram means and SD were determined from n=14–15 replicates. The two-sample t-test was used to determine significance of differences between clone means, indicated by asterisks above the SG histogram bars (**P <0.01; ***P <0.001).
Leaf, internode and root total N concentration and internode-to-leaf ratios in new growth
| SG | FG | df | |||
| Expanding leaf | 3.5±0.30 | 4.2±0.46 | −4.10 | 24 | <0.001 |
| Expanding leaf internodes (1–6) | 2.3±0.24 | 1.9±0.49 | * | * | 0.04 |
| Leaf-to-internode ratio | 1.5 | 2.1 | – | – | – |
| Source leaf | 2.9±0.19 | 3.9±0.45 | −7.12 | 24 | <0.001 |
| Source leaf internodes (7–13) | 2.1±0.30 | 1.6±0.44 | 3.89 | 31 | <0.001 |
| Leaf-to-internode ratio | 1.4 | 2.4 | – | – | – |
| Mid-stem internodes | 1.6±0.2 | 1.2±0.2 | 4.42 | 21 | <0.001 |
| Elongating root | 3.1±0.24 | 3.3±0.3 | −2.29 | 29 | 0.03 |
| Coarse root | 2.2±0.15 | 2.4±0.2 | −1.92 | 29 | 0.06 |
Total N (% dry weight) data were pooled from both harvests of FG and SG plants. Means and standard deviations were obtained from at least n=8 SG and n=15 FG plants. Statistical significance of the differences between clone means was determined using the two-sample t-test for parametric data, and the Mann–Whitney rank sum test for non-parametric data (*).
Total leaf C content and C:N ratio
| SG | FG | |
| Total C | ||
| Expanding leaf | 46.71±0.29 | 45.88±0.67 |
| Source leaf | 46.63±0.97 | 45.42±0.51 |
| C:N ratio | ||
| Expanding leaf | 13.31±1.04 | 11.07±1.25 |
| Source leaf | 16.25±1.08 | 11.76±1.27 |
Data were pooled from both harvests of FG and SG plants. Means and standard deviations were obtained from n=8 (SG) or n=15 (FG) plants. As determined by two sample t-test, differences between genotypes were significant (P <0.001) for all comparisons, and the C:N ratio differed significantly between expanding and source leaf in SG (P <0.001).
Fig. 8.Proposed phenylpropanoid effects on N distribution and vascular development in SG and FG. Enhanced lignification in roots and lower stems of SG is proposed to reduce N distribution, represented by the term ‘flux’, into upper internodes. A decrease in foliar %N results, which favours starch and CT accrual at the expense of cellulose deposition in developing vascular traces. With less cellulose scaffolding, lignification is reduced and NSPs such as the PGs become the predominant phenylpropanoids. Ultimately, both reduced vascular development and high sugar demand for NSP biosynthesis interfere with the provision to expanding leaves in SG.