Literature DB >> 19516016

The effect of ambient illuminance on the development of deprivation myopia in chicks.

Regan Ashby1, Arne Ohlendorf, Frank Schaeffel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent epidemiologic studies have shown that children who spend a higher proportion of time outdoors are less likely to develop myopia. This study was undertaken to investigate whether light levels may be a relevant factor in the development of myopia. METHODS; Paradigm 1: Chicks were fitted with translucent diffusers for 5 days, with the diffusers removed daily for 15 minutes under one of three lighting conditions: (1) normal laboratory lighting (500 lux), (2) intense laboratory lighting (15,000 lux), or (3) daylight (30,000 lux). A control group, which continuously wore diffusers, was also kept under an illumination of 500 lux. Paradigm 2: Chicks fitted with translucent diffusers were raised for 4 days under one of three lighting conditions: (1) low laboratory lighting (50 lux, n = 9), (2) normal laboratory lighting (500 lux, n = 18), or (3) intense laboratory lights (15,000 lux, n = 9). In groups 1 and 3, the chicks were exposed to either low or high ambient illuminances for a period of 6 hours per day (10 AM-4 PM), but were kept under 500 lux for the remaining time of the light phase. Axial length and refraction were measured at the commencement and cessation of all treatments, with corneal curvature measured additionally in paradigm 2.
RESULTS: Paradigm 1: The chicks exposed daily to sunlight for 15 minutes had significantly shorter eyes (8.81 +/- 0.05 mm; P < 0.01) and less myopic refractions (-1.1 +/- 0.45 D; P < 0.01) than did the chicks that had their diffusers removed under normal laboratory light levels (8.98 +/- 0.03 mm, -5.3 +/- 0.5 D). If the diffusers were removed under intense laboratory lights, the chicks also developed shorter eyes (8.88 +/- 0.04 mm; P < 0.01) and less myopic refractions (-3.4 +/- 0.6D; P < 0.01). Paradigm 2: The chicks that wore diffusers continuously under high illuminance had shorter eyes (8.54 +/- 0.02 mm; P < 0.01) and less myopic refractions (+0.04 +/- 0.7D; P < 0.001) compared with those chicks reared under normal light levels (8.64 +/- 0.06 mm, -5.3 +/- 0.9 D). Low illuminance (50 lux) did not further increase deprivation myopia.
CONCLUSIONS: Exposing chicks to high illuminances, either sunlight or intense laboratory lights, retards the development of experimental myopia. These results, in conjunction with recent epidemiologic findings, suggest that daily exposure to high light levels may have a protective effect against the development of school-age myopia in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19516016     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-3419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  106 in total

1.  Protective effects of high ambient lighting on the development of form-deprivation myopia in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Earl L Smith; Li-Fang Hung; Juan Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Blue Light Protects Against Temporal Frequency Sensitive Refractive Changes.

Authors:  Frances Rucker; Stephanie Britton; Molly Spatcher; Stephan Hanowsky
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Comparison of measurements of time outdoors and light levels as risk factors for myopia in young Singapore children.

Authors:  R Dharani; C-F Lee; Z X Theng; V B Drury; C Ngo; M Sandar; T-Y Wong; E A Finkelstein; S-M Saw
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-05-04       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 4.  Visual regulation of refractive development: insights from animal studies.

Authors:  E L Smith; L-F Hung; B Arumugam
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Stopping the rise of myopia in Asia.

Authors:  Lothar Spillmann
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Studies on retinal mechanisms possibly related to myopia inhibition by atropine in the chicken.

Authors:  Ute Mathis; Marita Feldkaemper; Min Wang; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-12-26       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Seasonal variations in the progression of myopia in children enrolled in the correction of myopia evaluation trial.

Authors:  Jane Gwiazda; Li Deng; Ruth Manny; Thomas T Norton
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Association of Visual Impairment With Economic Development Among Chinese Schoolchildren.

Authors:  Catherine Jan; Rongbin Xu; Dongmei Luo; Xiuqin Xiong; Yi Song; Jun Ma; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 16.193

9.  Objectively Measured Light Exposure During School and Summer in Children.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Auzita Sajjadi; Julia S Benoit
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Racial variations in the prevalence of refractive errors in the United States: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Chen-Wei Pan; Barbara E K Klein; Mary Frances Cotch; Sandi Shrager; Ronald Klein; Aaron Folsom; Richard Kronmal; Steven J Shea; Gregory L Burke; Seang-Mei Saw; Tien Y Wong
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 5.258

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.