Literature DB >> 19515953

Song decrystallization in adult zebra finches does not require the song nucleus NIf.

Arani Roy1, Richard Mooney.   

Abstract

In adult male zebra finches, transecting the vocal nerve causes previously stable (i.e., crystallized) song to slowly degrade, presumably because of the resulting distortion in auditory feedback. How and where distorted feedback interacts with song motor networks to induce this process of song decrystallization remains unknown. The song premotor nucleus HVC is a potential site where auditory feedback signals could interact with song motor commands. Although the forebrain nucleus interface of the nidopallium (NIf) appears to be the primary auditory input to HVC, NIf lesions made in adult zebra finches do not trigger song decrystallization. One possibility is that NIf lesions do not interfere with song maintenance, but do compromise the adult zebra finch's ability to express renewed vocal plasticity in response to feedback perturbations. To test this idea, we bilaterally lesioned NIf and then transected the vocal nerve in adult male zebra finches. We found that bilateral NIf lesions did not prevent nerve section-induced song decrystallization. To test the extent to which the NIf lesions disrupted auditory processing in the song system, we made in vivo extracellular recordings in HVC and a downstream anterior forebrain pathway (AFP) in NIf-lesioned birds. We found strong and selective auditory responses to the playback of the birds' own song persisted in HVC and the AFP following NIf lesions. These findings suggest that auditory inputs to the song system other than NIf, such as the caudal mesopallium, could act as a source of auditory feedback signals to the song motor network.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19515953      PMCID: PMC2724348          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00293.2009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

1.  Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback.

Authors:  A Leonardo; M Konishi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-03       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Auditory feedback in learning and maintenance of vocal behaviour.

Authors:  M S Brainard; A J Doupe
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Different subthreshold mechanisms underlie song selectivity in identified HVc neurons of the zebra finch.

Authors:  R Mooney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Song presentation induces gene expression in the songbird forebrain.

Authors:  C V Mello; D S Vicario; D F Clayton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Precise auditory-vocal mirroring in neurons for learned vocal communication.

Authors:  J F Prather; S Peters; S Nowicki; R Mooney
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Motor-driven gene expression.

Authors:  E D Jarvis; F Nottebohm
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-04-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Reafferent thalamo- "cortical" loops in the song system of oscine songbirds.

Authors:  G E Vates; D S Vicario; F Nottebohm
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1997-04-07       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Identification of a forebrain motor programming network for the learned song of zebra finches.

Authors:  E T Vu; M E Mazurek; Y C Kuo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A synaptic basis for auditory-vocal integration in the songbird.

Authors:  Eric E Bauer; Melissa J Coleman; Todd F Roberts; Arani Roy; Jonathan F Prather; Richard Mooney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-02-06       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Vocal experimentation in the juvenile songbird requires a basal ganglia circuit.

Authors:  Bence P Olveczky; Aaron S Andalman; Michale S Fee
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  17 in total

1.  Deafening drives cell-type-specific changes to dendritic spines in a sensorimotor nucleus important to learned vocalizations.

Authors:  Katherine A Tschida; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Short bouts of vocalization induce long-lasting fast γ oscillations in a sensorimotor nucleus.

Authors:  Brian C Lewandowski; Marc Schmidt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Motor origin of precise synaptic inputs onto forebrain neurons driving a skilled behavior.

Authors:  Daniela Vallentin; Michael A Long
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Memory circuits for vocal imitation.

Authors:  Maaya Z Ikeda; Massimo Trusel; Todd F Roberts
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 5.  Auditory signal processing in communication: perception and performance of vocal sounds.

Authors:  Jonathan F Prather
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Manipulation of a central auditory representation shapes learned vocal output.

Authors:  Huimeng Lei; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 7.  Auditory-vocal mirroring in songbirds.

Authors:  Richard Mooney
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Motor circuits help encode auditory memories of vocal models used to guide vocal learning.

Authors:  Todd F Roberts; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  At the interface of the auditory and vocal motor systems: NIf and its role in vocal processing, production and learning.

Authors:  Brian Lewandowski; Alexei Vyssotski; Richard H R Hahnloser; Marc Schmidt
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2013-04-17

10.  Motor circuits are required to encode a sensory model for imitative learning.

Authors:  Todd F Roberts; Sharon M H Gobes; Malavika Murugan; Bence P Ölveczky; Richard Mooney
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-16       Impact factor: 24.884

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.