Literature DB >> 19515609

Multiplex PCR tests sentinel the appearance of pandemic influenza viruses including H1N1 swine influenza.

James B Mahony1, Todd Hatchette, Davor Ojkic, Steven J Drews, Jonathan Gubbay, Donald E Low, Martin Petric, Patrick Tang, Sylvia Chong, Kathy Luinstra, Astrid Petrich, Marek Smieja.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since the turn of the century seven new respiratory viruses have infected man and two of these have resulted in worldwide epidemics. Both SARS Coronavirus which quickly spread to 29 countries in February 2003 and H1N1 swine influenza that recently spread from Mexico to 30 countries in three weeks represent major pandemic threats for mankind. Diagnostic assays are required to detect novel influenza strains with pandemic potential.
OBJECTIVE: In this report we evaluate the ability of a multiplex PCR test (xTAG RVP) to detect new, "non-seasonal" influenza viruses including the H1N1 swine influenza A/swine/California/04/2009. STUDY
DESIGN: Laboratory based study using retrospective and prospective specimens.
RESULTS: This multiplex PCR test detected the present of non-seasonal (non-H1, non-H3) influenza in 20 of 20 patients infected with H1N1 swine flu virus. In addition to detecting the current swine flu the xTAG RVP test detected the H5N1 A/Vietnam/1203/2004 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus that circulated in South East Asia in 2003 as well as 17 out of 17 influenza A viruses representing 11 HA subtypes isolated from birds, swine and horses not yet seen in the human population.
CONCLUSION: Based on these results we believe that this molecular test can perform an important role as a sentinel test to detect novel non-seasonal influenza A viruses in patients presenting with influenza-like illness (ILI) and therefore act as an early warning system for the detection of future pandemic influenza threats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19515609      PMCID: PMC5153328          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.05.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


Background

The current outbreak of swine influenza that originated in Mexico in March 2009 has spread to 39 countries in one month causing 8,480 cases globally with 66 deaths as of May 17. The 2009 swine flu virus designated H1N1 A/swine/California/04/2009 is not zoonotic swine flu and is not transmitted from pigs to humans, but rather from person to person. In humans, H1N1 swine flu presents as an influenza-like illness (ILI) with symptoms similar to those of seasonal influenza viz. namely chills, fever, sore throat, muscle pains, severe headache, coughing, weakness and general discomfort. Since these symptoms are not specific to swine flu, early in the pandemic physicians were advised to consider swine influenza in the differential diagnosis of patients with acute febrile respiratory illness who had returned from Mexico or been in contact with persons with confirmed swine flu however, this epidemiological link will require modification. This new strain of H1N1 swine influenza appears to be a result of reassortment of two swine influenza viruses, one from North America and one from Europe with the North American virus itself the product of previous reassortments, carrying an avian PB2 gene for at least 10 years and a human PB1 gene since 1993. The hemagglutinin (HA) gene is similar to that of swine flu viruses present in United States pigs since 1999, while neuraminidase (NA) and matrix (M) genes resemble viruses present in European pigs. Viruses with this genetic makeup have not previously been found in humans or pigs, although there is no formal national surveillance system to identify what viruses are circulating in pigs in North America. The genetic makeup of this virus is germaine to the design of molecular tests for diagnosis. Multiplex PCR testing for the detection of respiratory viruses has seen major advances over the past decade resulting in the development of several commercially available tests. These tests can amplify one or more genes from a number of respiratory viruses and detect amplified products using microgene arrays. One test, the xTAG™ RVP test, was developed to detect 20 different virus types and subtypes in a single test using multiplex RT-PCR and detection with a microfluidic array on the Luminex 100 instrument. The xTAG™ RVP test was developed in 2005 immediately following SARS and H5N1 influenza and was designed to detect and type the three influenza A subtypes circulating at that time viz. H1, H3 and H5. Understanding how the xTAG™ RVP test identifies influenza A is important to its detection of new “non-seasonal” influenza viruses. The test amplifies a conserved part of the matrix gene found in all influenza A viruses and specific regions of the H1 or H3 genes. The test therefore simultaneously detects influenza A and determines the H1 or H3 subtype. Since all seasonal influenza viruses in man over the past 20 years (prior to H5N1 in 2003 and swine influenza in 2009) have been either H1 or H3, the RVP test can effectively detect the presence of non-seasonal (non-H1, non-H3) virus by virtue of a positive matrix gene signal and negative H1 and H3 signals, a combination of results that flag a “new” influenza subtype and potential pandemic threat.

Objective

The objective of the study was to demonstrate that the use of multiplex PCR tests such as the xTAG™ RVP test that use a combination of matrix and hemagglutinin gene targets can detect novel non-seasonal strains of influenza.

Study design

The study was a laboratory based study using specimens from newly diagnosed H1N1 swine flu human cases and avian, swine and equine isolates of influenza A.

Results

The introduction of H1N1 swine flu this year provided a real life challenge for the RVP assay. The RVP test results for 20 confirmed cases of H1N1 swine influenza in four Canadian cities in three provinces (Nova Scotia, Ontario and British Columbia) are shown in Table 1 . All 20 individuals who presented with ILI, had either recently returned from Mexico or had an epidemiologic link to travelers to Mexico, and were confirmed as positive for H1N1 A/Swine/California/04/2009 by either the National Microbiology Laboratory in Winnipeg, the Ontario Agency for Health Prevention and Promotion in Toronto, or the BCCDC in Vancouver using a combination of real time matrix gene PCR, real time PCR targeting the A/Swine/California/04/2009 HA gene or by sequencing the HA gene. Matrix gene signals for all 20 patients were positive (mean signal was 6,970 MFI) while the H1 and H3 signals were negative indicating the presence of a non-seasonal, non-H1, non-H3 influenza A virus.
Table 1

xTAG™ RVP results for matrix, H1 and H3 hemagglutinin targets for 20 confirmed cases of H1N1 swine influenzaa.

PatientaSpecimenSourceMatrixH1H3Result
1NPToronto821417350Flu A No subtype
2NPToronto55446042Flu A No subtype
3NPToronto669110534Flu A No subtype
4NPToronto776411544Flu A No subtype
5NPToronto83355420Flu A No subtype
6NPToronto5102366Flu A No subtype
7NPToronto21574939Flu A No subtype
8NPToronto84253430Flu A No subtype
9NPToronto91041182Flu A No subtype
10NPHalifax92318348Flu A No subtype
11NPHalifax89868254Flu A No subtype
12NPHalifax5527855Flu A No subtype
13NPHamilton75106055Flu A No subtype
14NPHamilton65037567Flu A No subtype
15NPHamilton60193532Flu A No subtype
16NPHamilton79758150Flu A No subtype
17NPVancouver15563324Flu A No subtype
18NPVancouver62734826Flu A No subtype
19NPVancouver3767367Flu A No subtype
20NPVancouver19192112Flu A No subtype

NP specimens were collected from patients who recently returned from Mexico or who were in contact with travelers to Mexico and presented with ILI in Toronto, Halifax, Hamilton, and Vancouver. The xTAG™ RVP was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions and the cutoff for positivity was 300 MFI.

xTAG™ RVP results for matrix, H1 and H3 hemagglutinin targets for 20 confirmed cases of H1N1 swine influenzaa. NP specimens were collected from patients who recently returned from Mexico or who were in contact with travelers to Mexico and presented with ILI in Toronto, Halifax, Hamilton, and Vancouver. The xTAG™ RVP was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions and the cutoff for positivity was 300 MFI. To further validate the ability of the RVP test to identify non-H1, non-H3 influenza viruses we tested 17 influenza A viruses representing 11 of the 16 HA subtypes and four untyped isolates. The influenza subtypes tested included both high pathogenicity and low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses isolated from four bird species (turkey, quail, mallard, chicken) in five countries (Canada, Italy, England, U.S.A., and Vietnam), four swine and two equine viruses. The results show that all 17 viruses had a positive matrix signal (mean, 7,692) and negative signals for both H1 and H3 genes (Table 2 ). For comparison, one H1 and two H3 seasonal influenza specimens gave readings of 8,716, 1,566, and 3,255 for the H1 and H3 targets, respectively. The RVP test also correctly flagged two H5N1 isolates as H5 subtypes (using unmasked software). These results indicate that the RVP test can distinguish between seasonal H1, H3 influenza and non-H1, non-H3, non-seasonal avian or animal influenza.
Table 2

xTAG™ RVP results for the matrix and hemagglutinin gene targets for 17 influenza A isolates from human, avian, equine and swinea.

SourceSubtypeStrainMatrixH1H3H5
HumanH1N1A/New Caledonia/20/998,3458,7166432
HumanH3N2A/Brisbane/10/20074,443881,56620
HumanH3N2VR47889,849723,25548
HumanFlu BB/Yamagata/16/8827423522
AvianH2N2G01-302146,982496238
AvianH4N6A/DK/Czeck/569,4905710846
AvianH5N1A/Mallard/Vietnam/133/20041,7394731787
HumanH5N1A/Vietnam/1203/20041,5443430624
AvianH6N5A//Shearwater/Aus/729,722627068
AvianH7N3A/Chicken/British Columbia/041,97237269
HorseH7N7A/Prague/5610,333714538
HorseH7N7A/Equine/Cambridge/1/633,006252816
AvianH8N4A/Turkey/Ontario/689,697985848
AvianH9N2A/Turkey/Wisconsin/662,104363324
AvianH10N8A/Quail/Italy/659,815495352
AvianH14N5A/Mallard/263/829,901546241
AvianH15N8A/Duck/Aus 341/839,948725717
SwineuntypedOVC 07-109018,577603434
SwineuntypedOVC 06-286008,148514942
SwineuntypedOVC 04-238666,6071024146
SwineuntypedOVC 06-5828510,865574341

The xTAG™ RVP was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions and the cutoff for positivity was 300 MFI. VR4788 is an H3N2 virus isolated from a patent returning from Mexico who was negative for H1N1 swine flu using two swine flu HA gene real time PCR assays. G01-30214 is an H2N2 swine isolate determined by sequencing the HA gene. The influenza B/Yamagata/16/88 virus tested negative for the influenza A matrix gene but was positive for influenza B gene in the RVP test.

xTAG™ RVP results for the matrix and hemagglutinin gene targets for 17 influenza A isolates from human, avian, equine and swinea. The xTAG™ RVP was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions and the cutoff for positivity was 300 MFI. VR4788 is an H3N2 virus isolated from a patent returning from Mexico who was negative for H1N1 swine flu using two swine flu HA gene real time PCR assays. G01-30214 is an H2N2 swine isolate determined by sequencing the HA gene. The influenza B/Yamagata/16/88 virus tested negative for the influenza A matrix gene but was positive for influenza B gene in the RVP test.

Discussion

The emergence of H1N1 swine influenza has provided a real life challenge for the RVP test to detect new pandemic strains. The xTAG™ RVP successfully flagged 20 out of 20 swine flu patients as having non-seasonal influenza while at the same time correctly identified seasonal influenza (8 H1N1 and 14 H3N2), 3 parainfluenza type 3, 6 rhino/enterovirus, 2 coronavirus 229E, and 1 metapneumovirus infections in Hamilton during the month of April. By running the test daily as a sentinel test, we have been able to provide public health authorities with a probable swine flu result with a 24 h turn around time faster than that provided by our Public Health Laboratories. While laboratories rush to build H1N1 swine flu specific assays, currently available molecular tests such as the xTAG™ RVP assay provide a solution for detecting swine flu cases in the absence of specific H1N1 swine flu tests. We believe that the RVP test if implemented in diagnostic algorithms can play an important role as a sentinel test to detect novel non-seasonal influenza A viruses in patients presenting with ILI and therefore act as an early warning system for the detection of future pandemic influenza threats.

Conflict of interest

All authors have agreed to the content of the manuscript and its submission to the journal. JBM is an inventor on a patent relating to the xTAG™ RVP test. All authors declare that the content of the manuscript is original and has not been published or submitted for publication to another journal.
  3 in total

Review 1.  Detection of respiratory viruses by molecular methods.

Authors:  James B Mahony
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Development of a respiratory virus panel test for detection of twenty human respiratory viruses by use of multiplex PCR and a fluid microbead-based assay.

Authors:  J Mahony; S Chong; F Merante; S Yaghoubian; T Sinha; C Lisle; R Janeczko
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Principles of the xTAG respiratory viral panel assay (RVP Assay).

Authors:  Frank Merante; Sevana Yaghoubian; Richard Janeczko
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.168

  3 in total
  18 in total

1.  Practical Guidance for Clinical Microbiology Laboratories: Viruses Causing Acute Respiratory Tract Infections.

Authors:  Carmen L Charlton; Esther Babady; Christine C Ginocchio; Todd F Hatchette; Robert C Jerris; Yan Li; Mike Loeffelholz; Yvette S McCarter; Melissa B Miller; Susan Novak-Weekley; Audrey N Schuetz; Yi-Wei Tang; Ray Widen; Steven J Drews
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Evaluation and clinical validation of an alcohol-based transport medium for preservation and inactivation of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  Kathy Luinstra; Astrid Petrich; Santina Castriciano; Mona Ackerman; Sylvia Chong; Susan Carruthers; Brenna Ammons; James B Mahony; Marek Smieja
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Real-time detection of influenza a, influenza B, and respiratory syncytial virus a and B in respiratory specimens by use of nanoparticle probes.

Authors:  Paul J Jannetto; Blake W Buchan; Kimberly A Vaughan; Joellen S Ledford; Dennis K Anderson; Donald C Henley; Neil B Quigley; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of novel H1N1-specific primer-probe sets using commercial RT-PCR mixtures and a premixed reaction stored in a lyophilized format.

Authors:  Timothy K W Cheung; Alex W H Chin; Kwok H Chan; Michael Schumaker; Polly W Y Mak; Horasis S Y Leung; Ada Wong; J S Malik Peiris; Olga V Petrauskene; Leo L M Poon
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 2.014

5.  Diagnostic testing for pandemic influenza in Singapore: a novel dual-gene quantitative real-time RT-PCR for the detection of influenza A/H1N1/2009.

Authors:  Hong Kai Lee; Chun Kiat Lee; Tze Ping Loh; Julian Wei-Tze Tang; Lily Chiu; Paul A Tambyah; Sunil K Sethi; Evelyn Siew-Chuan Koay
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  Detection of influenza H7N9 virus: all molecular tests are not equal.

Authors:  Todd F Hatchette; Steven J Drews; Nathalie Bastien; Yan Li; Gregory German; Nick Antonishyn; Hugues Charest; Tony Mazzulli; Kevin Fonseca; Mel Krajden; Martin Petric; Kerry Dust; Jason J LeBlanc
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Assessing secondary attack rates among household contacts at the beginning of the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic in Ontario, Canada, April-June 2009: a prospective, observational study.

Authors:  Rachel Savage; Michael Whelan; Ian Johnson; Elizabeth Rea; Marie LaFreniere; Laura C Rosella; Freda Lam; Tina Badiani; Anne-Luise Winter; Deborah J Carr; Crystal Frenette; Maureen Horn; Kathleen Dooling; Monali Varia; Anne-Marie Holt; Vidya Sunil; Catherine Grift; Eleanor Paget; Michael King; John Barbaro; Natasha S Crowcroft
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Determination of the relative economic impact of different molecular-based laboratory algorithms for respiratory viral pathogen detection, including Pandemic (H1N1), using a secure web based platform.

Authors:  Bonita E Lee; Shamir N Mukhi; Jennifer May-Hadford; Sabrina Plitt; Marie Louie; Steven J Drews
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 4.099

9.  Use of sensitive, broad-spectrum molecular assays and human airway epithelium cultures for detection of respiratory pathogens.

Authors:  Krzysztof Pyrc; Karol Stożek; Krzysztof Wojcik; Katarzyna Gawron; Slawomir Zeglen; Wojciech Karolak; Jacek Wojarski; Marek Ochman; Magdalena Hubalewska-Mazgaj; Grazyna Bochenek; Marek Sanak; Marian Zembala; Andrzej Szczeklik; Jan Potempa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Diagnosis of influenza viruses with special reference to novel H1N1 2009 influenza virus.

Authors:  Shobha Broor; Harendra Singh Chahar; Samander Kaushik
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 2.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.